LAW 00507 Study Guide - Final Guide: Byron White, Young Offenders Act, Regulatory Offence

84 views25 pages
31 Jul 2018
School
Department
Course
Professor
CriminalProcedureExamNotes
ProcedureandCriminalLaw
Whyisprocedureimportant?
● Procedureprovidesaframeworkthatfacilitatessubstantivelaw
● Itisintegraltoensuringfairness:TomTylerarguesthat“whenthirdpartydecisionsare
fairlymadepeoplearemorewillingtoacceptthemvoluntarily.”p119inSocialJustice:
OutcomeandProcedure
● IdealsystempostulatedbyTomTyler:
○ VoiceRighttobeheard
○ Neutrality
○ Impartiality
○ Objectivity
○ Legitimacy
● Procedureservesaprotectivefunctioni.e.toprotectusfromtheimproperexerciseof
power:"Thehistoryoflibertyhaslargelybeenthehistoryoftheobservanceofprocedural
standards"JusticeFelixFrankfurter,McNabbvUS1943
CivilvCriminal
● Statetakesonactionnotindividual:Acivilmodelputsthevictimincharge,acriminal
modelputsthecommunity(thestate)incharge(MarshallandDuff,Criminalisationand
sharingwrongs)
● Stateactsonbehalfofwidercommunity
● Statecanimposepunishment,duetoinequalityofpower,theremustbelimitonstate
powerse.g.limitsonpolicepower
CriminalisationWhatisacrime?
● Theideathatawrongdonetoanindividualisawrongtothecommunity(Marshalland
Duff,Criminalisationandsharingwrongs)
● Thequestionofwhatisawrongagainst“us”istoask“whichvaluesare(whichshould
be)socentraltoacommunity’sidentityandselfunderstanding,toitsconceptionofits
members’good,thatactionsthatattackorfloutthosevaluesarenotmerelyindividual
mattersthattheindividualvictimshouldpursueforherselfbutattacksonthecommunity.”
p19
HarmPrinciple
● Boundaryoflibertyisharm.Peopleshouldbeallowedtoactatlibertybutnottotheextent
thatitharmspeople.Thisphilosophicalpositionisaproductof19thcenturyliberalism
reflectingaviewthatthesocialworldisfoundeduponindividualselfinterestandrights.
● Thisisthemostenduringprincipleonthecriminaljusticesystem
Unlock document

This preview shows pages 1-3 of the document.
Unlock all 25 pages and 3 million more documents.

Already have an account? Log in
● Buthowtodeterminewhatisharmtoothers?Thisconceptis“notoriouslyunstableand
difficulttoapply”(SimonandMcSherry,Thephilosophicalfoundationsofthecriminal
law).Centralquestionsmayinclude:(1)mustharmbedirectorcanitbeindirect?(2)
Whattypeofharmshouldbeincludede.g.physical,psychological,economic,
environmental?(3)Towhatextentifatalldoestheprincipleaccommodateconduct
involvingpotentialharm?
● Theboundariesareamorphis.
CommunityWelfare
● Thisprinciplearisesfromdissatisfactionwithasocialindividualism(liberalismandthe
harmprinciple)orpaternalism(legalmoralism)
● Basicprincipleisthatwhatisorshouldbeconsideredacrimedependsuponan
evaluationofwhatis“best”forthesocietyasawhole
● Itisoftenviewedasaimposingabalanceorcheckontheprincipleofautonomye.g.the
mandatorywearingofseatbeltsorbanningofdruguseislegitimatedonthegroundsthat
resultinginjuriesmayimposeburdensonthecommunitythroughtheprovisionof
healthcareandsocialservices
● Legaldebateisoftentrappedintheeither/orscenarioofeitherliberalismorcommunity
welfare
Morality
● Moralitycanbereligiousorsecular
● Moralscanchangeovertime.However,therecanbeasharedsenseofmoralitythat
bindspeopletogetherLordDevlin’sargument.Incontext,Devlinwasarguingagainst
theliberalisationoftraditionaloffencessuchashomosexualityandprostitution
● CriticisedonthebasisthatalotofthemoralargumentsareJudeoChristianbasedwhich
marginalisesotherreligiousgroups.Itmaynotbepossibletofindcommonmorality
betweenthesegroups.
PublicInterest
● Whileappearingtobeneutralandobjective,thepublicinterestishighlymalleablepolitical
concept
● Judicialfallbackonpublicinterestcanleadtouncertainty
● Studiesonattitudestowardterrorismhasshownthatblameworthinessdifferedbetween
identicalterroristactsdependingonthetypeofmotivepossessedbythesuspect.Ifthe
suspectwasmotivatedbyreligion,itwasidentifiedasbeingmoreblameworthywhich
raisestheriskofattitudinalbiasamongbothjuriesandjudges.
● Publicinterestisneitherneutralnorautonomous,itishighlydependantonhistorical,
politicalandsocialcontexts
Unlock document

This preview shows pages 1-3 of the document.
Unlock all 25 pages and 3 million more documents.

Already have an account? Log in
Criminalisationofdrugsascasestudy
(Source:BronittandMcSherryPrinciplesofCriminalLaw)
● Between19851997,principlephilosophyhasbeen“harmminimisation”thisisthe
balancingbetweentheharmofdruguseagainstharmcausedbyprohibition.
● TheModelCriminalCodeOfficersCommittee(MCCOC)distinguishedtheuseofdrugs
as“healthandregulatory”offencesandthedealingofdrugsas“traffickingoffences”
● Thisdistinctionhascomeundercriticismbecauseusersoftendealtosustainhabit
● Differentdrugsposedifferentdangersyettheyarecriminalisedinthesameway
● Prohibitioncausesillicitmarket,corruption
● Criminologicalresearchhasshownthatprohibitionofdrugshasbeenineffectiveand
evencounterproductive.Overcriminalisationhascaused:
○ Pricesdrivenupwhichinturnpressuresuserstodealtosustainhabit
○ Highpriceencouragescriminalgroupstodealforprofit
○ Marginalisationinducesuserstoengagewithotherundesirablebehaviours,
especiallyyouth(drugcrimenexus)
○ Covertdruguseposeshealthrisks
○ Othermedicalrisksassociatedwithunadulterateddruguse(overdose,morbidity
andmortality)
○ Significantstrainonlawenforcementandthecriminaljusticesystem
● Harmminimisationhasleadtotheintroductionofneedleandsyringeexchangeprograms
andsafeinjectingroomsNationalCentreinHIVEpidemiologyandClinicalResearch
hasshownthatbetween20002009,anestimated32,050HIVinfectionsand96,667Hep
Cvirusinfectionshavebeenavoidedprovidinganetfinancialcostsavingof$1.03billion
dollars
● Outlawingdrugssocialwelfareargument
● AllowingindividualdrugtakingbutoutlawingtraffickingLiberalistargument
Note:approachincriminallawinthatlawreflectspublicinterestbutthelawcanalsoshape
publicopinion.InAustralia,opiateswereinitiallybannedtotargetuseinmigrantChinese
communities.ItsuseanddistributiontoAboriginalAustralianswasprohibited,andonlylater
extendedtotherestofthecommunity.Inthe1970s,moralpaniceruptedoverthecorruptive
qualitiesofdrugsandespeciallyonyoungpeople.
● O’MalleyandMugfordhavearguedinTheDemandforIntoxicatingCommodities
Implicationsforthe“WaronDrugs”thatprohibitionandlegalisationaretwoendsoftheU
curve.Neitherisideal.Somewhereinthemiddleiswhereregulationofintoxicating
commoditiesshouldsit.Likethecurrenttreatmentoftobacco,itshouldnotbedriven
undergroundbutitshouldberegulated,advertisingremoved,driveuppricesbutnot
enoughtoencourageblackmarket,advocacy.
● Withregardstodruguse,thereshouldbeamoveto(1)normalisetheusernottheuse
and(2)buildupontheresourcesof“civilsociety”i.e.bymakingsaferdrugsmore
Unlock document

This preview shows pages 1-3 of the document.
Unlock all 25 pages and 3 million more documents.

Already have an account? Log in

Get access

Grade+20% off
$8 USD/m$10 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Grade+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
40 Verified Answers