Study Guides (248,610)
Canada (121,635)
Psychology (776)
PSYC 2301 (28)
Midterm

Midterm 1_Review Notes.docx

6 Pages
162 Views

Department
Psychology
Course Code
PSYC 2301
Professor
Patrick Hill

This preview shows pages 1 and half of page 2. Sign up to view the full 6 pages of the document.
Description
INTRODUCTION TO HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY MIDTERM #1 REVIEW: February 11 Key Terms: Mediator: third variable that may explain relationships between dependant/independent variables; the mechanism(s) underlying effect eg. Social Support-> Depression social decision making confidence optimism Moderator: third variable which the effect is conditioned; determinant of effect size eg. for which group will low social support lead to more depression. Age, sex, sexual orientation -older adults benefit more from structured/existing social structure -younger, more from larger SS EXAMPLE: attending class=better grades IV: class attendance, DV: better grades Mediator: rehersal of knowledge Moderator: attentiveness Optimism Bias: most people think odds are good that you can avoid risks that may befall others. Studies show that adults and teens have similar risk taking thoughts. Primary Prevention: avoiding an ailment or injury (eg wearing seatbelts) Secondary Prevention: Identifying and addressing an issue early in the process (eg mammograms) Tertiary Prevention: Trying to contain or if possible combat the issue (eg pain medications) General Methodology Type of Study Positives Negatives Correlational -quick/easy -cannot determine causality -gives general idea of answer -dependant of accuracy of responding Longitudal: eg recording eating -better idea of causality -time consuming/costly habits over a period of time -helps rule out other -attrition rates can be high explanations Experimental -Random assignment -Don't know long term effects -Clear idea of how groups differ -Finding might not generalize outside the lab Intervention: 2 weeks, provide -Understand possible -time consuming/costly one group benefits (cost) of mechanism -can it be generalized at a larger eating pizza compared to control -learn which ind. may be more or scale? less susceptible to influence Quantitative: asking participants -insights to how people to describe life formulate their narratives -proves valuable to allow people to choose responses v leading qs -allows us to know what 'laypeople' think about specific constructs Factors Affecting a Healthy Lifestyle 1. Socioeconomic Status - lacking resources ∙ healthy foods tend to be more costly ∙ adequate options for physical activity ∙ access to health information 2. Neighbourhood - access to outdoor activities - community support for physical support (also norms/expectations) - local weather - frequency and availability of drugs 3. Ethnicity and Race - apprehensions about healthcare system - often highly correlated with SES - cultural expectations 4. Gender - women tend to engage in more health behaviour than men, seek healthcare more often - men engage in more physical activity (previous gender roles, labour jobs) - health care, promoting health behaviours, food regulations 5. Public Health - trade off between personal liberties and promoting public health - should drinking water be fluorinated? Intervention Studies - long term manipulation of independent variable where the intent is to make long lasting effects on dependant variable. ∙ One must consider: ◦ cost and ability of large scale implementation phases of study ◦ choosing right sample ◦ appropriate time frame ◦ maintaining quality control and equal doses between participants ◦ precise measurement of outcomes ◦ understanding mechanisms that account for effects at hand - Case Examples ∙ Drug Abuse Resistance Program led by police force (focuses on influencing drug attitudes, self esteem, etc) ∙ Behavioural Activation programs (planning skills, self control, etc) ◦ Question of Intervention Efficacy?  DARElittle to no utility (a) not influencing mediators or final outcome (b) negatively affects self-esteem (c) some studies suggest participants were more likely to use drugs later in life (d) US gov't withheld funding in 2007  BA (a) consistently reduces binge drinking and smoking cigarettes (b) seems to be much more promising than DARE  Why didn't DARE work? (a) issues maintaining quality control (i) volunteer bias for police> varying levels of presentation skills (b) in areas not prominent in drug use, may make students bel
More Less
Unlock Document

Only pages 1 and half of page 2 are available for preview. Some parts have been intentionally blurred.

Unlock Document
You're Reading a Preview

Unlock to view full version

Unlock Document

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit