Study Guides (234,339)
Canada (113,118)
Psychology (714)
PSYC 2400 (82)

11 Mental illness in court.docx
11 Mental illness in court.docx
Premium

9 Pages
115 Views
Unlock Document

School
Carleton University
Department
Psychology
Course
PSYC 2400
Professor
Jenelle Power
Semester
Fall

Description
Mental illness in court Presumptions in Canada’s Legal System - Elements that must be present for criminal guilt: • Actus reus: Awrongful deed (the act) • Mens rea: Criminal intent (the intent to perform the act) - Must be found beyond a reasonable doubt for a guilty verdict to be reached Fitness to Stand Trial - Unfit to stand trial: An inability to conduct a defence at any stage of the proceedings on account of a mental disorder - How mental illness affects if a crime was committed and if there was intent - Whether the person can help prepare their defence – understand what’s going on • Must be coherent Fitness Standard - Unfit to stand trial if (due to mental disorder) unable to: • Understand nature or object of proceedings • Understand possible consequences of the proceedings  Must understand that they could be given a sentence • Communicate with counsel - Time limit on evaluation • 5 day limit to determine if fit to stand trial  Can be extensions, but not over 60 days - My be raised at various stages of the proceedings • Can be fit to begin with but found unfit throughout the trial process How does Canada determine who is unfit? - Only medical practitioners • Psychologists can help with assessment - Use screening tools • Then full examinations - Number of standardized tools available • Issue of ground truth  Ground truth – no reliability within the tools  What you’re measuring against  Don’t know who is unfit objectively - No parameters on the types of medical physician – even though some have more experience Fitness Instruments - Assess (example) understanding of legal proceedings, cognitive functioning, etc. - Fitness Interview Test Revised (FIT-R) - Competency Screening Test (CST) - Competency to Stand TrialAssessment Instrument (CAI) - Interdisciplinary Fitness Interview (IFI) - MacArthur CompetenceAssessment Tool-CriminalAdjudication (MacCAT-CA) Fit vs. Unfit Defendants - Unfit defendants more likely to: • Never married • Unemployed and living alone • Older females belonging to a minority group with fewer marital resources • 4X more likely to meet criteria for a psychotic disorder  Highly likely to have a severe mental disorder • Less likely to have substance abuse problems  Less substance abuse- opposite of other offenders What happens if someone is unfit? - Proceedings halted until fit • Reassessed within 45 days - Try to get the person fit- medication/treatment (ex: therapy) • Most commonly medication • Debate around right for person to refuse medication  People with serious mental disorders don’t understand their need for medication – medicine usually has lots of side-effects • Treatment orders can be imposed (forced injection) - If unlikely to become fit, court can stay proceedings according (Bill C-10) What if person doesn’t become fit? - If continues to be unfit after 90 days, get referred to review board • Assessed every two years • Once a year for youth - Prima facie case • Every 2 years or on request - Continually determine if still unfit, if fit can go to trial • But cases deter overtime so if not enough evidence after time, even if fit, case is thrown out Mental State at Time of Offence - Insanity: impairment of mental or emotional functioning that affects perceptions, beliefs, & motivations at time of offence - Legally, insanity removes the responsibility of performing an act because of uncontrollable impulses or delusions (not responsible) Brief History - Daniel M’Naughten– 1843 • Tried to shoot Sir Robert Peel, the PM of Great Britain • 1894: NGRI defence adopted in Canada  Not guilty by reason of insanity  Now use NCRMD • 1992: Bill C-30 - First time insanity was used Canadian Legislation (Bill C-30) - Insanity term changed to “not criminally responsible on account of mental disorder” (NCRMD) - “…rendered the person incapable of appreciating the nature and quality of the act or omission or of knowing that it was wrong” - Review boards were created - If found NCRMD, review boards decide absolute discharge, in community but with conditions, or in psychiatric hospital Not Criminally Responsible on Account of Mental Disorder (NCRMD) - No person is criminally responsible for an act or omission committed while suffering from a mental disorder that rendered that person incapable of: • Appreciating the nature and quality of the act or omission • Knowing that it was wrong - Mental disorder that affected them at the time of the crime • Relevant to the crime
More Less

Related notes for PSYC 2400

Log In


OR

Don't have an account?

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.

Submit