3 Pages
Unlock Document

McGill University
Arts & Science
BASC 201
Rick Schultz

Summary CIVIL PROCEDURE The Role of Procedure 2: rules of procedure are intended to carry out substantive law. If it is not of public order and was remedied right away, cannot affect the proceeding. Should use these rules to facilitate advancement of cases. 4.2: parties must be sure that the proceedings the cost and time of proceedings are proportionate to the nature and purpose of the action. 9: a judge can extend a non-peremptory time limit or relieve someone of consequences of missing it. (2) Parties can agree to time limits that differ from code (if they are non-peremptory ones) *Vachon v. AG: rules of procedure should not be used to dismiss an action on its merits. Don’t use procedural rules in a way that jeopardizes the very rights they are meant to protect. (ORP) 1.04(1)(1.1):when applying the rules, court should make orders that are proportionate to importance and complexity of case 1.05: court should impose terms and directions that are just. Hamel v. Brunelle and Labonte: in an appeal, amendments to one’s claim should be allowed in order to render an objective (proper) judgment. Interest 55: if one brings an action at law, need to have sufficient interest therein (real issue in which you have a real interest in how it is resolved) 56: (1) person must have capacity to be a party to an action. (2) if he does not have capacity, must be represented/assisted. (3) irregularity resulting from failure to be assisted has no effect unless it is not remedied. Can be remedied retroactively, even in appeal. 59: (1) person cannot use another’s name to plead, except the State via authorized representatives. (2) But, when there are several people, one may represent all via a mandate. All are jointly and severally responsible. Death of mandators doesn’t effect mandate (3) tutors, curators, administrator of property, mandatary in anticipation of incapacity etc. plead in their own name. *Bou Malhab v. Diffusion: action in defamation can only succeed if a personal injury has been sustained by the plaintiff(s). also, to bring a case, one needs to have quality to sue (juridical personality) and not just be a non-cohesive group. Sun Media v. STM: need sufficient interest in an issue in order to bring it to court (i.e to contest a K between two other parties.) Public Interest Standing Thorston v. AG: Citizen should be granted public interest standing in order to contest a governmental (languages) act. Nova Scotia Board of Censors v. McNeil: Public interest standing granted to contest a censor boards decision. Widening of public interest standing door. Minister of Justice v. Borowski: private citizen granted standing to contest abortion provisions of criminal code. *Finlay v. Canada (Minister of Finance): Public interest standing should be granted if there is a non-constitution issue that is justiciable, serious and that the person has a genuine interest in it. *Canadian Council of Churches v Immigration Canada: Strict Test to determine if public interest standing should be granted: 1) Is there a serious issue? 2) Has the plaintiff demonstrated genuine interest in it? 3) Is there another reasonable and effective way to bring the issue before the court? **Canada v. Downtown Eastside Sex Workers: Flexible Test. Th
More Less

Related notes for BASC 201

Log In


Don't have an account?

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.