Poli 322 Presentation.docx

2 Pages
56 Views

Department
Political Science
Course Code
POLI 322
Professor
Narendra Subramanian

This preview shows 80% of the first page. Sign up to view the full 2 pages of the document.
Description
Poli 322 Presentation India and Pakistan: interpreting the divergence of two political trajectories (By Christophe Jafferlot) Presented by: Sheikh Huzaifa Uzair . Main argument of the essay: By analyzing the impact of historical legacies on the formation of institutions in India and Pakistan, we can explain the puzzling difference in the political trajectories of the two countries. Author proposes five hypothesis to analyze the above mentioned divergence: 1. India and Pakistan, despite sharing a colonial past, did not inherit the same political experience following independence. 2. Priority given to security was different in the two countries leading to different political trajectories followed. 3. Existence of ethnic groups played out differently in the two countries. 4. The number and the nature of political parties were different in India and Pakistan. 5. Differences in social structures led to different political trajectories in the two countries. Arguments in favor of Hypothesis no. 1 and 2: Colonial legacy and its impact on the political trajectory: - Different regions of the subcontinent were administered in a different fashion by the British Raj. Overall, the main story is of a gradual devolution of power to the Indians. However, the provinces of Punjab, NWFP and Baluchistan (all three of which later became part of Pakistan) were administered differently than the rest of India. All three suffered from a lack of democratic practices, high militarism (observed more in Punjab and NWFP than Baluchistan) and a political culture based on the lines of paternalism and patronage. - Punjabis and Pashtuns = martial races of the empire  implications for post-independence Pakistan. Post-Independence Institutional structures: - Constitutional structure: India’s one constitution vs. Pakistan’s three constitutions. - State Machinery: State machinery in India remained functional after independence (including bureaucracy, army and treasury). Across the border however, Pakistan had to build everything from scratch. - Problems of nation building: Pakistan’s issues over national language vs. India’s 15 official languages provision. - Security related issues: Security obsession of Pakistan vs. India’s self-confidence on security questions. Differences in military expenditures. - Role of the leadership: appointment of governor generals. Arguments in favor of Hypothesis 3: Pakistan’s anti majority syndrome: Clash between the political elites of east and the west wing of Pakistan over the issues of: - Constitution proposal’s prescribed mechanics of the legislative assemblies (conflict over the law of numbers) and, - the national language India’s Political Pluralism based on ethno linguistic diversity: Linguistic pluralism leading to political pluralism and democracy by: - Recognition of 15 official languages, 1 By passing successive acts: 1882 self-government act followed by refo
More Less
Unlock Document

Only 80% of the first page are available for preview. Some parts have been intentionally blurred.

Unlock Document
You're Reading a Preview

Unlock to view full version

Unlock Document

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit