POLI 222 Final: Conference 2 Notes: Native Sovereingty
4 Aug 2016
School
Department
Course
Professor
Document Summary
No(flanagan): too complicated and not realistic because of the way they are geographically located, too scattered. Many of them live in cities, so how would aboriginals take ownership of them. Different philosophies too complicated to create a third order of government. 2)significance of the text-how does it tye to the text. Basis it on the argument involving the impracticality or not feasible. Only pertains to state that make up the classification of sovereignty. Sovereign nations are part of the un, it is on an international level, the aboriginals have never had that in history. - no historical basis for sovereignty. Dispersed throughout the country so consolidating them into one branch of government is not feasible- impracticle because ultimately, they are dispersed no defined territory to give them autonomy. Need to increase improved property rights and local autonomy, but he goes against a larger role in the federal government.
