Study Guides (251,482)
CA (122,868)
McMaster (7,475)
KINESIOL (394)
Midterm

KINESIOL 2C03 Midterm: Midterm 2

11 Pages
79 Views

Department
Kinesiology
Course Code
KINESIOL 2C03
Professor
Audrey Hicks

This preview shows pages 1-2 and half of page 3. Sign up to view the full 11 pages of the document.
Description
Effect of Velocity of SSC Potentiation  A high velocity compared to a low velocity generates more ECC force  Isolated CON force decreases  ECC has more to ‘give’  CON has more to ‘gain’  Velocity of ECC affects SSC potentiation even if CON velocity doesn’t change  As velocity increases, force decreases o Using the SSC increases overall CON after ECC  > Relative (%) potentiation at higher velocities  Explains why SSC is most important in running, jumping, throwing, kicking (fast movements)  At a given velocity, ECC contractions can be submaximal or maximal Examples of Effect of ECC Force  Max ECC followed by max CON is done on isokinetic dynamometers (lab 2)  Sub max ECC followed by max CON done in throwing and jumping  Sub max ECC followed by submax CON done in weight training (several reps) When is SSC Inappropriate?  When time is needed for ECC phase and can’t be spared (backstroke push off)  When a rule forbids its use  When overuse can lead to injury o High impact aerobic and high velocity plyometrics (step classes)  Can create too much SSC (jump from too high) o Inhibition and can’t absorb shock Effect of Training of SSC  Increased ECC force (strength o Increased muscle size o Increased neural activity  Increased storage of elastic energy o Connective tissue/tendon (stiffer) o Cytoskeleton (stiffer)  Increased reflex potentiation o Increased neural activation  Ex, gymnasts and volleyball players were not inhibited by jumping higher o Training improved “shock absorption” o Able to use SSC more efficiently SSC and Efficiency  Efficiency = energy out/energy in x 100  Expressed as %  Rate of using 02 (metabolic rate and mechanical power)  More energy efficient when using the SSC o Increased ECC force from stretched CBs  No ATP cost, decreased overall elastic energy o Storage and release of elastic energy  No ATP cost, decreased overall elastic energy o Prevention of ‘wasted’ CB action taking up the SEC  More efficient use of ATP  Running vs. walking o Running uses more energy than regular walking (efficient) o Running uses same energy despite speed and time o Race walkers use the most energy (inefficient) o Running uses the SSC with bouncing Force-Length Relation (FLR)  Variation in muscle force (tension) at different muscle lengths  See graph on page 90  Passive force increases with length  Active force increases to optimal length and then decreases  Passive force: resistance of relaxed muscle to stretch (no active CBs)  Active force: produced by active CBs during contraction  Total force: active + passive force  Optimal length: length at which greatest active force occurs  Resting length: length at which passive force begins to develop  Relationship between optimal length and resting length varies in different muscles o Gastroc: resting length occurs then optimal length o Sartorius: Resting length at same time as optimal length o Semitendinosus: Optimal length then resting length  Working range of Force Length Relation (lab 3) – limits depend on muscle  Extensibility limit (muscle rupture) (flexibility) Mechanism for Variation in Passive Force  Exponential increase in resistance of relaxed muscle to stretch  Force collected in connective tissue, tendons and cytoskeleton Mechanism for Variation in Active Force  Plateau due to bare zone with no CBs  At optimal length o Optimal overlap of actin and myosin o All CBs can bind to actin o Maximal possible force  Greater than optimal length o Incomplete overlap of actin and myosin o Not all CBs can bind to actin o Decreased force  Less than optimal length o Actin filaments overlap with each other o ‘Disruption’ of CB bind to actin o Decreased force o Z-disks compress myosin filament o “Resistance” to sarcomere shortening o Decreased force Inter-Species Differences  Myosin Filament length – little variation  Actin Filament length – significant variation o Humans have greatest length o Frogs have shortest length o See different species lengths in page 99 Strength Curves  % maximum strength depends on joint angle  Peak or summit (pg 102) depends on action and joint  Variation in strength through range of motion  Depends on: o Force-Length Relation  Different muscles operate on different parts on the FLR  Pg 104 o Muscle Moment Arm  Perpendicular distance between the line of pull of the muscle and the joint centre  Torque = F x ma (Nm)  Changes throughout ROM  Smaller MA needs more force  Effect on torque depends on differences in force Interaction of MA and Force Length Relation  May not always contribute equally  Depends on muscle  Depends on weight on MA to force length relation Why are MAs so small?  Think of like fulcrum – weight needs to be closer to axis of rotation  Force and MA have to be equal to hold a weight statically  Pg. 109 Cost of Small Moment Arms  Result in decreased torque (strength) and increased injury o Avulsion: tendon and muscle detach from bone o Due to large muscle force needed for ‘modest’ torque  If MA increases, and ROM decreases, speed of joint motion decreases*** Advantage of Small Moment Arms  For the same amount of muscle shortening, increased range of motion and speed  Ex, muscles A and B have same cross sectional area and fibre length o B has twice the moment arm and twice the torque o B has to shorten twice as much as A for a given change in joint angle o B has half the angle of motion Other Influences on the Shapes of Strength Curves  Training o Neural Adaptations: recruiting, firing, first 6 weeks o Muscle Adaptations  Fatigue o Effect is much greater as muscle shortening increases  Injury o Nervous system doesn’t activate in fear of further damage (partial as well)  Maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) around 120 degree joint angle o Differs between men and women o Men have stronger elbow flexors (bodybuilders as well)  When bent and at max contraction pull is not as efficient o Bulge of muscle causes less efficient sarcomere shortening Strength Curves and Strength Measurements  Isometric Strength Measurement  Greater error in measurement to peak (ISO)  Peak strength is measure at same joint angle usually on summit  May not always have peak/’flat’ section  May have the same range but shorter contraction o More error, big difference in strength  Range of Movement (ex, hamstrings increase in strength as angle increases)  Most strength at close to full extension for hamstrings  Force increases with concentric and decreases with isometric? Strength Curves and Training Equipment  Ideal weight is close to matching strength  Cable lateral raises matches strength curve better than lateral dumbbells  Variable resistance pulley increases force required  Full extension of an elbow curl has a shorter radius  Full contraction of an elbow curl has a bigger radius  Strongest at 120 degrees, not when short for elbow curl  An isokinetic device automatically matches resistance to strength curve Neural Control and Motor Units  Anterior spinal cord is motor, posterior is sensory  Cord is made up of gray matter  Spinal cord diameter = 15 mm  NMJ diameter = 7 um  Muscle fibre diameter = 100 um  Motor unit = motoneuron + innervated muscle fibres  Motoneuron = cell body (soma) + axon (15 um diameter) o Diameter decreases with increased branching o Axons include many branches, one per muscle fibre  Motoneuron or motor neuron  Increased complexity decreases muscle fibres/ MU (MU size)  # of MUs depends on complexity of movement and muscle size  # of MUs/muscle determined by both the size of the muscle and the size of the MUs  Fibres of different motor units intermingle with each other  Overlapping of MU territories prodce the ‘mosaic’ look of a muscle cross section  All fibres of a motor unit are the same fibre type Motor Neuron Territory  750 MUs = 1/750 (.13%) of total number  If total area = 1000m2, each MU would occupy 1.3 mm2  Studies actually show territory to be 5 mm diameter, so area for each MU is 20 mm2  So each motor unit occupies 2% of muscle area instead of predicted .13 o ~15 x greater Purpose of large MU territories and intermingling of fibres of different units?  MU force is distributed over a large area  smoother contraction  May help delay fatigue: inactive and active fibres, or different fibre types share metabolites and capillaries Motor Unit Types  Slow twitch (ST) = Slow Oxidative (SO) = Type 1  Fast twitch (FT) = Type II = 2 subtypes o Fast Oxidative Glycolytic (FOG) = IIA o Fast glycolytic (FG) = IIB (IIX in humans)  Depends on training
More Less
Unlock Document
Subscribers Only

Only pages 1-2 and half of page 3 are available for preview. Some parts have been intentionally blurred.

Unlock Document
Subscribers Only
You're Reading a Preview

Unlock to view full version

Unlock Document
Subscribers Only

Log In


OR

Don't have an account?

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit