Study Guides (248,356)
Canada (121,501)
Final

Political Science 2F03 Exam Review.docx

18 Pages
571 Views
Likes
Unlock Document

Department
Political Science
Course
POLSCI 2F03
Professor
Peter Graefe
Semester
Winter

Description
Political Science 2F03 Exam Review Exam format: 2 hours; 2 sections st 1 section shorter answers 3 of 5 based on the readings/ tutorial questions 45%; one each wndk as a tool as to what are the arguments 2 section 55% essay 3 questions you answer one of them; useful to make the arguments made by the readings, the exam focuses on the 2 half of the course a bit more; but all encompassing. Possible Questions for Section 1: 1. How satisfied should we be with elections and party competition as the primary means of ensuring democratic decision- making, and confronting collective challenges? 2. Can social movements and community organizations interact with the state without being co-opted? Is being co-opted a bad thing? 3. How democratic is interest group involvement in decision-making? Does it enable greater citizen participation or input, or does it supplant the democratic process by allowing unelected groups to make policy rather than representatives elected on specific mandates? 4. Why does Smith argue, ―engagement with law is a problematic and ambiguous project for disadvantaged groups‖? (p. 146). 5. What kind of relationships can be struck between aboriginal peoples and the Canadian state that meet the standards of justice and legitimacy? 6. Why do Canadians outside Quebec, who claim to embrace cultural diversity, have such a strong antipathy to recognizing national diversity? Is the discourse of diversity really a smokescreen for a pan-Canadian nationalism seeking a ―normal‖ nation-state? 7. Can we say that the media provides enough information about important issues to allow a democratic citizenry to make informed choices? If not, why not? Section 2 Essay questions: 1. What‘s the difference between Multiculturalism and Multinationalism? Which one of these frames could accommodate better Aboriginal peoples in Canada? In what ways the situation of Aboriginal peoples is similar to the situation in Quebec? In what ways are they different?  Multiculturalism: the doctrine that several different cultures (rather than one national culture) can coexist peacefully and equitably in a single country.  Multinationalism: people differ in how they describe themselves, not tied to territory; does not provide other citizens rights 2. Discuss the possibilities and limitations of political parties (cadre, mass, and brokerage model), Social movements and interest groups to represent citizenry and foster democracy, (include examples of Canadian context)  Brokerage parties- even though they might differentiate, but they adopt a popular support. Collects different people from different groups; it‘s a flexible group  Mass parties- joined around a certain ideology; clear defined program that joins people  Are Interest groups are alternative to parties? Social movements influences policies coalitions between parties and groups; recourses and expertise to bulge for change could be problematic; social movements might have a top down effect.  The problem with parties is that they do not adequate preach for the needs of the citizens, there are not many options, overlapping of ideas (they are similar to an extent)  Policies and ideologies are behind them to push for things like health care and policies that everyone likes. More economically feasible for that policy (economic issues). More and more neo-liberal ideologies of the economy and free trade (make them to converge in brokerage model)  Difference between social movements and interest groups is that SOCIAL MOVEMENT aims to social structure, referred to grass root and make you couscous about issues, main objective to work with people. Interest groups- lobbying and are doing things to directly influence policy 3. What are the problems with parties to represent people? What kind of policies and ideologies are behind them to push for? Difference between social movements and interest groups? 4. Define: voting, Parliament, courts, citizenship, and how effective they are? (the question is something along these lines)  Parliament- representation; democratic process, and is time consuming  Voting  Courts establish over arching evidence for future laws; not representative of the population; but is not representative of the whole population  Citizen consultation: how effective would it be? Depends on the size and whether they are motivated; (NAC- evidence based policy making). Consensus; are not effective because everyone has different opinions and does not give concise answers. Themes and Topics that will be on the Exam: · Understanding of national and cultural differences · Poverty · Inequality · Environment instability · Gender equality · Different ways of political power · Political parties · Brokerage parties · Impact of losing political parties o is there a way to go around them or rebuild them o challenging the power of capital · Role of parties and the influence of social movements and interest groups · Social movements; cycle of movement; mobilization resulted in institutionalization o changed our country and how it is different in the world o activism in the corporate community o implications; cost and demobilization § Trying to change what the state is and what it does · Interest groups o inclusion and exclusion o those who are outside and inside o explained figure of power o legitimacy o experience o ideas o structural power o de-legitimatization o citizen consultation; what is lost and gained o collective interest changing policy o how groups mobilize through legal channels · Citizenship o relationship of the state and people o interest groups and social movements were pushing for their own rights o about shaping rights o who is included and excluded · Broader connection/consensus of the political community o what Canada is multinational or multiculturalism · What policies need to be adopted about multiculturalism · Structural power of capital o distorts democracy · How can we re-engage people to solve collective problems? Readings and Lecture notes: Parties and Elections: Notes: Smith, A Civil Society? ch. 4 Arenas of Influence: Parliament, Parties, and Elections  transition from the Keynesian to the neoliberal era had reinforced the obstacles created by the Canadian Westminster system of governance to the influence of groups and social movements on legislatures and the party system  Canadian party system is dominated by the ―brokerage‖ model with respect to party organization and electoral strategies  volatility of the voters, the brokerage nature of the major parties, the first-past- the-post rulers of the electoral system, and the rules of party and election financing create a legislative system dominated by the governing party  Major barriers to group influence through the individual member of parliament or the opposition parties under most circumstances  The nature of dominant parties is reinforced and exacerbated by the increasingly important role of the media in election campaigns  Transition to neoliberal has entailed a dumbing down of politics and political debate  Neoliberalism politics of privatization, deregulation, welfare state roll-backs, and the attacks on social solidarity and collectivism. William Cross and Lisa Young, ―Are Canadian Parties Empty Vessels? Membership, Engagement and Policy Capacity,‖ Summary/Abstract: Volunteers have traditionally played a significant role in Canadian political parties, as campaign workers, supporters of candidates for party leadership or nomination, and local organizers. In the contemporary era of professionalized, media- oriented politics, however, the already circumscribed role of the Canadian party member has been limited even further. In this paper, the authors analyze the data of a 2000 survey of members of what were then Canada‘s five major political parties and find that party members are not satisfied with their ability to shape party policy and are particularly resentful of the extent to which political professionals have usurped the role of the party member. Because party membership in Canada is a form of public service and thus contributes to the vibrancy of political life in the country, the authors argue that we should be concerned that rates of party membership appear to be dropping, the average party member is nearing retirement and is not being replaced, and rates of activism within parties are relatively low. All of these tendencies are products of complex social change, reinforced by institutional constraints that have historically limited the role of Canadian party members. As such, they defy easy solutions. Cross and Young argue, however, that one approach that might encourage party membership and help political parties to fulfill their roles in public life would be to encourage parties to give a more meaningful, ongoing role in the development of their public policy positions to their rank-and-file members. They suggest that if parties are to attract more Canadians as members and, more important, as ongoing participants in their affairs, they need to offer voters greater opportunities to influence party stances on questions of public policy. It is their view that in the long term, the establishment of vigorous party-policy foundations would not only help to address the concerns of voters about the lack of a meaningful role for them in party politics but would also strengthen our parties and our democracy more broadly. At present, our parties have little capacity for generating new policy alternatives. The parliamentary parties are necessarily concerned with the immediate issues of the day and the extra-parliamentary parties have few resources for anything other than election preparation. The result is that our elected officials are largely dependent on other organizations for policy innovation. Formal policy foundations, organized and maintained by the political parties, would both provide opportunity for grassroots members to influence a party‘s policy direction and act as an ongoing policy resource for the parliamentary party. Knowing that policy interest motivates party membership in Canada, and that stalwart party members are not content with their circumscribed role in policy development within their party, the authors see clear potential for parties to involve their members in policy discussions. In an era when Canada‘s federal political parties are largely funded by the public treasury, it is all the more important that they find ways to engage meaningfully with segments of Canadian society. Moreover, public funding can be structured in a manner that creates incentives for parties to speak directly with citizens on matters of public policy. Main Points: Grant Amyot, ―The Waning of Political Parties‖ Summary/Abstract: Main Points: William K. Carroll and R.S. Ratner, ―The NDP Regime in British Columbia, 1991- 2001: A Post-Mortem,‖ Summary/Abstract: Main Points: Social movement-State interactions Smith, A Civil Society?, ch. 3. Carol-Anne Hudson and Peter Graefe, ―The Toronto Origins of Ontario’s 2008 Poverty Reduction Strategy: Mobilizing Multiple Channels of Influence for Progressive Social Policy Change,‖ Summary/Abstract: This article, while largely descriptive in cast, seeks to make two contributions. The first is a crucial empirical one of describing key moments in the early development of the Ontario Poverty Reduction Strategy, thereby laying bare key events, personalities and networks that to our knowledge have not yet been studied. This can usefully inform future analyses by other scholars, be they interprovincial comparisons or arguments about why Ontario adopted the poverty strategy that it did rather than another one. The second contribution is to deepen our understanding of the ―geography‖ of social policy development in Ontario, and the difficult relationships that emerge between the central agenda-setting role of Toronto organizations and the demands for representation from other regions. Put otherwise, this analysis supports Mahon‘s understanding of how Toronto-based organizations often stand in as provincial associations in engaging the provincial state, and are assisted by the Toronto municipal state that is seeking certain policies for its own ends. It however renders that story more complex based on observations in the antipoverty sector. The article notes the tensions that arise from having that Toronto state/advocacy sector complex stand in for truly Ontario wide organizations, and secondarily those related to disputes on how to fashion a united appeal to t he state. Given our interest in the sources of the Ontario strategy, our analysis is focused on the period leading up to the announcement of the Ontario Poverty Reduction Strategy in December 2008, although we do briefly look beyond that date to highlight the persistence of those tensions and their impact on poverty policy advocacy in Ontario. Main Points: Rachel Laforest and Michael Orsini, ―Evidence-based Engagement in the Voluntary Sector: Lessons from Canada,‖ Summary/Abstract: The shift towards governance and greater reliance on third parties in the design, implementation and evaluation of policy has created new pressures to ensure that policies are designed and delivered in a consistent and effective manner. In the interest of improving transparency, accountability, effectiveness and efficiency, governments in Canada and in the UK, as in many industrialized countries, have begun to emphasize the need for evidence-based policy-making. As a result, knowledge and research have become key assets in the production of policy. Yet, with their current capacity and knowledge base wanting, governments have increasingly relied on the knowledge and information of external actors and have afforded greater authority to them on this basis. This has created a situation in which evidence-based inputs are given greater weight. This shift has particular implications for voluntary sector organizations whose basis for intervention has lain historically with the interests that they represent. Already, in the Canadian case many national organizations have seen their focus shift to research activities under the impetus of new funding initiatives explicitly encouraging activities grounded in knowledge and policy analysis. Moreover, policy guidelines have been elaborated in order to enhance the sector's capacity to contribute to the development of policy in a depoliticized manner. Using a series of interviews conducted with representatives from national voluntary organizations in Canada, this article explores the implications of such a shift for the voluntary sector in Canada, and asks whether the Canadian case holds some lessons for voluntary sector–state relations in other jurisdictions. Main Points: Interest groups, Policy communities Smith, A Civil Society?, ch. 5. Francesca Scala, Éric Montpetit and Isabelle Fortier, ―The NAC’s Organizational Practices and the Politics of Assisted Reproductive Technologies in Canada,” Summary/Abstract: As the formal ―carriers‖ of the goals and agendas of social movements, social movement organizations (SMOs) are committed to both institutional and identity politics. Given this dual engagement, SMOs must attempt to reconcile their intraorganizational strategies for representation and mobilization with their intergroup strategies for instrumental action in the policy process. In this article, these tensions are explored in a case study of the National Action Committee on the Status of Women (NAC) and its involvement in the policy debate on reproductive technologies over 15 years. The article reveals how the NAC's capacity to influence and participate in the formulation of policy on reproductive technologies was challenged by its inability to resolve competing demands: those of institutional politics, which called for professional advocacy; and the internal demands emanating from its grassroots member groups, for deliberation and participation. The article also attributes the NAC's diminished effectiveness in the policy process to broader changes in the relations between the Canadian state and social movement organizations. Main Points: Jonathan Greene, ―’Whatever It Takes’: Poor People’s Organizing, OCAP, and Social Struggle,‖ Summary/Abstract: On 16 November 1999, six busloads of people from Toronto, Tyendinaga, Kingston, and Montreal descended on Parliament Hill and mounted a spirited protest. This demonstration would have been no different than any other march on "The Hill" except for two things: this was a demonstration by homeless people and anti-poverty activists, and it erupted in violence with protesters attempting to tear down the barricades and the police responding with pepper spray.' This was the first time in Canadian history that pepper spray had been used on the Hill to quell a protest. The demonstration was organized and led by the Ontario Coalition Against Poverty (OCAP)--a decisively class-based, poor people's social movement organization. Main Points: George Hoberg and Jeffrey Phillips, ―Playing Defence: Early Responses to Conflict Expansion in the Oil Sands Policy Subsystem,‖ Summary/Abstract: This article examines how powerful policy actors defend themselves against opponents' strategies of conflict expansion through a case study on the oil sands of Alberta. In response to an escalation of criticism of its performance on environmental regulation and related issues, the government of Alberta has pursued a strategy of engaging in several multi-stakeholder consultations. We argue that in examining subsystem change, it is essential to go beyond an examination of formal institutional mechanisms to examine policy impacts. Thus far, despite a significant pluralisation of consultative mechanisms on the oil sands, there is little or no evidence of a shift in power away from pro-oil sands interests. This strategy of selective opening is designed to bolster the legitimacy of the policy process while maintaining control over decision rules and venues. Main Points: Citizen Consultation Rachel Laforest and Susan Phillips, ―Citizen Engagement: Rewiring the Policy Process,‖ Summary/Abstract: Main Points: Genevieve Fuji Johnson, ―Deliberative Democratic Practices in Canada: An Analysis of Institutional Empowerment in Three Cases,‖ Summary/Abstract: Analyzing three timely Canadian cases, this article develops an important relationship between the theory and practice of deliberative democracy. The Canadian Nuclear Waste Management Organization (NWMO), Nova Scotia Power Incorporated (NSP), and Toronto Community Housing Corporation (TCHC) recently held consultative initiatives appearing to seek the democratic empowerment of citizens. In each case, we see institutional features of deliberative democracy. But only the TCHC's participatory budgeting process begins to fulfill the promise of deliberative empowerment, that is, inclusive, informed, and equal public deliberation focused on a common good at the policy formulation, implementation, and evaluation stages. Why is the case of the TCHC characterized by greater deliberative empowerment than the cases of NSP and the NWMO? I explore possible explanations, all of which focus on the political context in which deliberation takes place. My overarching finding is that the motivation of policy elites within these organizations is key in the deliberative empowerment of citizens at the institutional level. I conclude by identifying factors that might account for the presence or absence of this motivation. Main Points: Courts Smith, A Civil Society?, Smith, ch. 6 Lisa Vanhala, ―Disability Rights Activists in the Supreme Court of Canada: Legal Mobilization Theory and Accommodating Social Movements,‖ Summary/Abstract: Disability rights organizations have been active participants before the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) since the mid-1980s but they have been completely neglected in the literature on social movement legal mobilization. This paper seeks to remedy this lacuna by providing an overview of the litigation activity of the main disability rights organizations. It builds on an emerging complementary theoretical perspective for understanding the participation by movement actors in the Court. Through an analysis of shared and contested collective meaning frames within and across social movement organizations we can complement existing theoretical explanations for the overall development of legal mobilization by social movement actors. Main Points: Aboriginal Peoples and the Canadian Political Order Kiera L. Ladner, ―Aysaka’paykinit: Contesting the Rope Around the Nations’ Neck,‖ Summary/Abstract: Main Points: Fiona MacDonald, ―Indigenous Peoples and Neoliberal ‘Privatization’ in Canada: Opportunities, Cautions and Constraints,‖ Summary/Abstract: This article addresses the impact of the current neoliberal political context for Indigenous governance in Canada. While some observers have argued correctly that the neoliberal context provides new opportunities or points of entry in the political opportunity structure for ―self-government‖ initiatives (Helvin, 2006; Scott, 2006; Slowey, 2008), I examine to what extent recent decentralizing initiatives, generally viewed as ―concessions‖ made by the state to meet the demands of Indigenous peoples, must be evaluated as part of a broader governmental strategy of neoliberalism. This strategy is not simply about meeting the demands of Indigenous peoples but also about meeting the requirements
More Less

Related notes for POLSCI 2F03

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit