Study Guides (248,605)
Canada (121,634)
Psychology (970)
PSYCH 1X03 (192)
T A (5)

16. Forming Impressions.docx

5 Pages

Course Code

This preview shows pages 1 and half of page 2. Sign up to view the full 5 pages of the document.
Forming Impressions Introduction  Difficult to accurately attribute intentions to observed actions because for every observed behavior, there are many possible motivating factors Attribution Theories Intro  How you interpret a behavior may lead you to form an impression that may or may not accurately reflect the circumstances o It can be due to a personality trait that is fixed or the present situation the person is currently faced with  You make automatic judgments about people which will influence how you think, feel and behave toward the person Correspondent Inference Theory  Jones & Davis correspondent inference theory o You actively analyze a person’s behavior to make inferences based on:  Degree of choice  Helps to know if the individual chose to act in the observed in question (ex. someone choses to be on a certain side of the debate  believes it)  May have difficulty appreciating the role of degree of choice in a chosen behavior  may develop strong emotional feelings for/against a movie actor who you assume is really that romantic or whatever characteristics in real life  Expectation  How expected a particular behavior is  Uncommon behavior gives us a lot more info than common behavior  if someone behaves in a way typical to what you would expect from them, you do not have any reason to infer an underlying cause to their behaviour  Intended consequences of behavior  Intention of the behaviour Ex. commercials promoting something, sending a certain message  Probably not develop the same suspicion if you heard your mom advocating the same position Covariation Theory  Kelley’s theory predicts how you determine id a given behavior is due to an individuals personal dispositions OR the situation and circumstances o If a behaviors is dispositional or situational:  Consistency  Does the individual usually behave this way in this situation?  Yes  seek explanation for this behavior; is Chris usually unable to get his computer to work?  Distinctiveness  does the individual behave differently in different situations?  Yes  situational  No  dispositional  Consensus  Do others behave similarly in this situation?  Yes  situational (everyone’s behavior is similarly influences by the situation)  No  dispositional (each individuals disposition) The Fundamental Attribution Error (FAE)  When interpreting the underlying cause of behavior in others, often overestimate the role of dispositional factors & underestimate the role of situational factors  Definition: tendency to over-value dispositional factors for the observed behaviours of others while under-valuing situational factors  coined by Ross  Jones found Ross’s term “overly provocative & somewhat misleading; furthermore, I’m angry that I didn’t think of it first” The Actor/Observer Effect  FAE  assume behavior of others primarily due to dispositional factors  Actor Observer Effect  consider the situational factors for your own behavior  Actor-observer effect: how you perceive your behaviors and that of others o You as an actor are better aware of the many situational factors contributing to your own behavior o When you observe others, you only have the current situation on hand  assume the behavior is representative of what you would typically observe  Harre: young drivers asked to explain the reason for their own & their friends risky driving behavior  Teens attribute their own driving behavior to situational factors (hurry, pressure); they were more likely to attribute their friends driving on personal factors (fun, showing off) Cultural Differences  FAE influenced by culture  Miller: examined how likely American & Indian children and adults were to attribute negative behavior to dispositional or situational factors o American 8 & 11 yr olds made a similar # of attributions as a result of personal & situational causes o Indian 11 years olds have a tendency to make more situational than personal attributions o more differences when comparing the two older groups o Americans make more attributions to personal/dispositional factors o Indians make more attributions to situational factors  suggests that there are cultural differences in the FAE  Morris & Peng: compared attributions made by Chinese & American graduates and newspapers o Compared to the Chinese, the American students & newspapers were more likely to make the FAE o FAE is diminished in collectivist societies where there is less focus on individual behaviors and more focus on relationships & roles within society o American Olympic winners increase probability of making FAE o Chinese Olympic winners decrease proba
More Less
Unlock Document

Only pages 1 and half of page 2 are available for preview. Some parts have been intentionally blurred.

Unlock Document
You're Reading a Preview

Unlock to view full version

Unlock Document

Log In


Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.