Study Guides (248,578)
Canada (121,621)
Criminology (164)
CRM 100 (33)
Midterm

CRM100 MID TERM REVIEW.docx
Premium

9 Pages
410 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Criminology
Course
CRM 100
Professor
Anne- Marie Singh
Semester
Fall

Description
MONDAY OCTOBER 21ST CRM 100: MIDTERM EXAM REVIEW FORMAT: All of the material up to Policing Part 2 SEPTEMBER 30TH 2013 A: 30 MULTIPLE CHOICE B: 3 OUT OF 4 ESSAYS WORTH 10 MARKS EACH READINGS (TEXTBOOKS (1,2,4,5,6,7) AND SACCO READING ESSAY: Repeat the question back in the intro (in this essay I will) In the conclusion just one sentence to wrap it up Multiple parts to each question, answer the full part with examples, and definitions _____________________________________________________________________________________ Essay Questions: Q. 1. Official crime statistics have been described in the following ways: (a) they give an adequate measure of crime; (b) they reflect a social response to a wide variety of events and activities in the community; and (c) they tell us nothing about crime. Discuss each view, pointing out the strengths and limitations of relying on official statistics to measure ‘crime’. A: The main method of measuring crime is relying on official statistics such as the UCR (uniform crime reporting system). These statistics do a good job on measuring crime rates for us but they also have many limitations. People have described these statistics of having an adequate measure of crime which is true in a sense, but also false in another. Although the statistics do give us a good general measure of crime, it is not 100% accurate because a huge percentage of crimes go un reported and therefore are not part of these statistics. We cannot assume that these statistics are giving us an adequate measure of crime because the reality is, a huge chunk of crime is not included in these statistics. These statistics will reflect a social response causing a wide variety of events and activities in the community because they will cause reactions in society. For example events made to stop drunk driving through lobby groups such as MADD, are all social responses to these statistics. If a certain crime has risen greatly in the statistics, there will often be a social response but not always. Sometimes there will be events raising awareness of certain crimes, but sometimes there will be no response. The final viewpoint on official statistics is that they tell us nothing about crime. This is true in the sense that statistics are only numbers and they do not tell us anything about the nature of crime, but it is false in the sense that these statistics give us a general idea of what crimes are being committed most, and the changes throughout the years. Q. 2.Discuss alternative ways of measuring crime which have been developed to address some of the limitations of ‘official’ statistics generated by the police. In your answer, you should discuss the ways in which these methods improve on official statistics, as well as the limitations that remain if we really want to understand the ‘true’ nature of criminal activity. In the final analysis, which method do you think is best, and why? A: When measuring crime, there are two main methods of doing so; the first being official statistics which are collected by the police, courts and corrections, and second, research based stats such as self reports and victimization surveys. - The Uniform Crime Reporting system is designed to generate crime statistics to be used in all aspects of law enforcement. - we cannot rely on the UCR alone to measure crime rates for us because there are disadvantages like underestimating the impact of police discretion, legal changes, but mainly the fact that a large amount of crime is not reported to the police, so it doesnt make it to the UCR. ^ This problem can be solved through the use of victimization surveys - Victimization surveys are social surveys asking representatives if they have been a victim, if the crime was reported, and their fear of crime. Victimization surveys help estimate the unrecorded crime rate, explain why crimes are unreported, provide info. on the impact of crime, and identify populations at risk. -^Limitations: Underreporting in victimization is also a problem; crimes are often forgotten. The rate of underreporting is also uneven, and it is not possible to ask about every single offense, which causes a survey bias. - Self - Report Surveys are similar to victimization surveys but different in the sense that people are asked directly about any criminal activities they may have been involved with. -Limitations: most of these surveys focus on youths and drug offenders, under reporting and honesty is also an issue. - I think although many crimes go unreported, the UCR method of measuring crime rates is the most efficient. I believe so because the other two research based methods have very big limitations, including underreporting. Both of the research based methods depend on the honesty of the people being interviewed, and whatever their bias is. I believe that the validity/ reliability of those being interviewed is a very large limitation to be put aside, there is no way to tell if the truth is being told in this surveys, while the reports given by the UCR are proven in court. Q. 3. Discuss the view that uniformed, public police in Canada are primarily crime fighters. In your answer, you should discuss the data that gives us an indication of how the police spend their time, and the various ways in which police organizations are evaluated. Use specific examples to support your points. A: Many people believe that the main and only function of the police is crime control and prevention. The fact of the matter is that crime control is not the only function of the police, and is not the main function of the police either. The police have many roles and duties other than crime control such as order maintenance, and social servicing. Majority of calls to the police are actually not even about crimes, but instead for traffic issues, internal police business, and public service calls. About 75% of calls to the police don't even reach a patrol officer. Data shows us that majority of the percentage of calls to the police are not about crime control and actually have to do with police officers other roles and duties. 25% of the calls to the police deal with internal police business, about another 25% deal with accidents and traffic problems. When looking at these numbers, it is pretty clear that the public police in Canada are not primarily crime fighters. This data gives us an indication that the police actually spend a lot of their time dealing with other affairs, and that crime control cannot be their primary duty. Q.4. Community policing has been described, in part, as “both a philosophy and organizational strategy that allows the police and community residents to work closely together in new ways to solve the problems of crime and fear of crime”. Discuss the ways in which the implementation of community policing reflects this view and how it differs from the ‘professional model’ of policing. What are some of the limitations to the complete implementation of community policing? Use specific examples to support your arguments. A: The community policing model which started around the 1980's reflects this view of residents working together in new ways to solve problems of crime because it allows the citizens to become experts and active participants in policing. This model is based around prevention of crime through community cooperation and consultation. Citizen input is required through identifying the problems within the community and prioritizing these problems as well. Citizens are also expected to give an input on how they should solve the problems in their community. The model of community policing differs from the professional model of policing because it revolves around "the 3 P's" being prevention, problem solving, and partnership with the community instead of "the 3 R's" (random patrol, rapid response, and reactive investigation).Community policing also has a more decentralized decision making procedure while the professional model of policing has a centralized decision making procedure. The community policing model is more focused on practicing methods such as restorative justic, zero tolerance and disorder based policing. This model of policing has benefits for the police through improving credibility issues, and benefits for the community through bringing residents together. This ultimately improves the police-community relationship which was quite fragile in the professional model. Although there are many benefits, there are also limitations to the community policing model such as resistance from the police and a lack of resources. Crime displacement also often occurs as criminals will relocate as a result of police- community efforts. There are also limitations when it comes to community participation and program stability. These limitations make a complete implementation of community policing difficult, but still possible. Q.5. It has been argued that policing as an activity must be distinguished from the police as a state institution. Provide a detailed analysis of the range of actors/agencies that are currently engaged in policing, as well as the concerns that are raised by their involvement in policing activities. A: Policing as an activity refers to the act of maintaining and reproducing social order. Policing is an organized activity with the aim of promoting a safe and secure environment in which people can live, work, and recreate free from un wanted interferences. Policing as an activity must be distinguished from the police as a state institution, because it is an activity that is done by not only the police. The police are individuals of an institution that are authorized by the state to use forces. They are one of the primary institutions given the right to use force by the state against its own citizens. The police of course do engage in policing, but so do other individuals and organizations. Another institution that engages widely in policing and police activities is private security. Private security can be contracted for certain individuals, organizations and facilities, and they can also be in house security. Private security operate under a sort of junior partner image, engaging themselves as risk management and prevention of crime. Although security engage in similar work, they are no substitute for the police. Concerns about this matter are raised as some private security call themselves equal partners and are in direct competition with the police, calling themselves private police. Many concerns are raised from the involvement of private security in policing. A big concern raised is the two tiered system of justice and security which is the idea that people who can afford private security will get a superior type of justice geared to them. Another issue raised is the impact on public space which means that since private security is being purchased very often now, public spaces are not being used as much and not being policed very effectively. There are huge accountability concerns with private security because these companies are not regulated and governed through the charter like the police are. Concerns have also been about the exchange of information between the two policing sectors and about private security sub cultures. To conclude, the act of policing must be distinguished from the police themselves because the state are not the only providers of security in our community. Q.6. Outline how the characteristics of police officers or of the police as a group may influence their exercise of discretion. How might these characteristics lead to poor police- community relations? What are the implications for the restructuring of police departments? A: There are many factors that influence police discretion. A big factor that will influence the exercise of discretion is the culture of the police. Members of the police all share common values which include the idea that the police are the only true crime fighters, and that nobody else understand the true nature of police work. Another big part of police culture is that the loyalty to their colleagues is above everything else. The police also believe that it is impossible to win the war against crime without bending the rules, and that members of the public are not only unsupportive, but also unreasonably demanding as well. This subculture of the police is a major reason why some police will resist the idea of community policing. The police do not like to be held accountable and will often support the misuse of police authority. An emotional barrier is often put up between police and the community. Through this police sub culture, the police have developed a set of personality traits that may lead to more arrests and use of force, influencing their exercise of discretion. These traits include cynicism, and hostility. Police cynicism is when officers lose respect of the law and replace it with other rules that are essentially defined by police subculture. This police cynicism leads to mistrust and fear of the police, causing poor police- community relations. Q.7. While there is a tendency to treat police discretion as inherently problematic, it has been argued that the “day-to-day operation of law enforc
More Less

Related notes for CRM 100

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit