MTH 141 Study Guide - Final Guide: Jagdgeschwader 2, Coefficient Matrix, Diagonalizable Matrix

196 views14 pages

fuchsiatermite554

1 Jan 2016

School

Department

Course

Professor

For unlimited access to Study Guides, a Grade+ subscription is required.

Document Summary

Multiply the matrix by a standard basis and rref, the matrix on the right is the inverse matrix. Linear mapping is proved by doing a similar method like with subspaces (closed under addition and scalar multiplication) if it is a linear mapping, it is linear. When asked whether matrix is in the range of l, you make it equal to each other and solve. In this case, d is the free variable. If the system is inconsistent, then the given matrix is not in the range of l. Isolate for a and c as (b and d) are free variables. When asked determine a basis for the range and nullspace of the linear. Mapping, solve for the leading variables (not free variables) after subbing zero as the solution to the matrix. Range is the polynomials of the leading variables 1, x^2 if it is linearly independent. The dimension of the range of the linear mapping is the rank.

Related Questions

Please help with all questions. Will rate ASAP.

This question addresses inverse transformations from a conceptual standpoint, a. Suppose that a linear transformation T: x rightarrow Ax from A to A takes some nonzero vector x to 0. Can this transformation be reversed? Does A exist? Suppose that a linear transformation T: x rightarrow Ax from is not one-to-one. What does that tell you about the set of vectors b that can be produced by applying the transformation T to all vectors x in A? How do you know, in that case, that the transformation T is not reversible (i.e. that there does not exist an inverse transformation with the standard matrix A-1 that can be applied to the result of Ax to restore the vector x to its original value)? Suppose that a linear transformation T: x rightarrow Ax from A to A is not onto. What does that tell you about the set of vectors b that can be produced by applying the transformation T to all vectors x in A? Is it possible for a linear transformation x rightarrow Ax from A to A to be one-to-one but not onto, or onto but not one-to-one? If so, please give examples of each case. If not, explain why not. Is it possible for an arbitrary linear transformation x rightarrow Ax from A to B to be one-to-one but not onto, or onto but not one-to-one? If so. please give examples of each case. If not, explain why not. For what values of {a. b. c, d. e.f. a. h. i.j } will the matrix A = invertible? what is the least amount of partitioning that needs to be applied to M; to make M1 and M2 conformable for block multiplication? What is the product M = M1, M2 that you obtain using block multiplication with these partitions? What is the product M = M1 M2. that you obtain by multiplying the two matrices without partitioning? For which three values of a is the matrix B = not invertible, and why If M1 and M2 arc partitioned matrices such that M1 For each matrix product shown below, draw in the partitions that would need to be added to make the multiplication possible: Describe in general how the sizes of each of the partitions(#rows, #columns) in a matrix product C = AB are defined by the sizes of the partitions in each of the matrices A and B when partitioned matrices are multiplied.

MTH 141 Study Guide - Final Guide: Jagdgeschwader 2, Coefficient Matrix, Diagonalizable Matrix

Document Summary

Get access

Related Documents

MTH 141 Chapter Notes - Chapter 3: L(R), Row And Column Spaces, Augmented Matrix

MTH 141 Midterm: MTH141 – F2014 Midterm2 (Solution)

MTH 141 Midterm: MTH141 – F2013 Midterm2 (Solution)

Related Questions