Study Guides (234,173)
Canada (113,010)
Philosophy (156)
PHL 302 (29)

one of the notes that i made
one of the notes that i made

10 Pages
104 Views
Unlock Document

School
Ryerson University
Department
Philosophy
Course
PHL 302
Professor
Glen Hoffmann
Semester
Fall

Description
Argument. The ethical and legal rationale behind the concept of informed consent and its relevance to nursing practice are examined. In this paper, it is argued that the function of informed consent is to protect patient autonomy and to promote meaningful decision- making. Given the potential for nursing care procedures to infringe patient autonomy, consent is clearly a relevant concept in nursing. Furthermore, in law, any touching without consent is a potential battery. Informed consent is often associated as a rigid procedure, only relevant to surgical or research procedures. Consent should be obtained prior to nursing care procedures whenever patient autonomy is at stake. However, information-giving should be determined by the needs of the patient and approached in such a way as to facilitate meaningful decision-making. Given the individual nature of infringements to patient autonomy, it is difficult to predetermine all those care procedures that require consent; any list of procedures would fail to be comprehensive. Conclusions. The principles of informed consent should underpin our approach to nursing care procedures, which should not be mechanistic but determined by the needs of individual patients. Keywords: informed consent, patient centred approach, patient autonomy, nursing care procedures Introduction The requirement to obtain informed consent prior to nursing care procedures is stipulated in various United Kingdom (UK) nursing policy documents (United Kingdom Central Council [UKCC] 1996, 2000). The UKCC (2000) requires that all nursing care procedures are carried out 'within a framework of informed consent' (p. 15). It is important that nurses understand the ethical and legal rationale behind this requirement so that the principles of informed consent are applied appropriately and consistently prior to nursing care procedures. In this paper, the rationale behind the concept of informed consent and its relevance to nursing practice are examined and the principles of informed consent are considered from the perspective of nursing practice in the UK. However, it is likely that the ethical principles of informed consent are internationally relevant. The history of informed consent -- from nuremberg to nursing There is evidence of a requirement for a patient to give consent prior to a clinical procedure as early as the 1700s (Slater v Baker & Stapleton 1767, 95 ER860-863). However, most accounts of the history and development of the concept of consent start with attention to the significance of consent prior to medical research, in the wake of appalling experimentation on human subjects that took place during the Nazi holocaust. This is important because in these accounts attention is focused on the importance of consent prior to participation in research (Nuremberg Code 1947). In the Nuremberg Code, the absolute requirement that a patient should give consent prior to involvement in clinical research was laid down: www.notesolution.com The person involved should have the legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching...and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. (Nuremberg Code Rule 1) At Nuremberg, the requirement of consent was made with specific reference to the human subject entering medical research. However, since then the concept of consent has been applied not only prior to research but also prior to clinical procedures, including nursing care procedures [UKCC 1996, 2000, and General Medical Council (GMC) 1998]. Furthermore, from the general concept of consent, the concept of informed consent has arisen. An expectation has developed that patients should give their informed consent prior to clinical procedures in addition to those associated with research, as described by Beauchamp and Childress (1994): In recent years, virtually all medical and research codes of ethics have held that physicians must obtain informed consent of patients before undertaking significant therapeutic or research procedures. (p. 67) The components of informed consent will now be examined. Principles of informed consent The concept of informed consent is described by Faden and Beauchamp (1986), who replicate the requirements for consent as outlined in the Nuremberg Code. They define informed consent as follows: X is an informed consent by person P to intervention I if and only if: 1. P receives a thorough disclosure regarding I. 2. P comprehends the disclosure. 3. P acts voluntarily in performing X. 4. P is competent to perform X. 5. P consents to I. (Faden & Beauchamp 1986, p. 275). Faden and Beauchamp (1986,p. 274) define informed consent as the patient's autonomous authorization and emphasize that autonomous authorization is more than a simple expressed agreement or acquiescence to the proposal by the patient. They argue that mere assent to a procedure does not indicate one's consent to it and that it is possible to submit to or comply with the plan of another without any actual agreement. Instead, they describe how, in giving consent, a patient 'actively authorizes the proposal in the act of consent' (p. 278). In order to give such autonomous authorization, a patient should be informed, be able to comprehend the information and voluntarily consent to the procedure. www.notesolution.comFaden and Beauchamp (1986,p. 275) suggest that the components of informed consent are largely undisputed in the ethical and philosophical literature. However, there is debate about the terminology used to define informed consent. Culver and Gurt (1982,p. 42) suggest that the term 'informed' consent would be better replaced by the term 'valid' consent. They argue that the information component is just one component of informed consent; a patient's consent can be 'informed' but not 'voluntary', in which case it would not constitute 'informed consent' according to the definitions cited above. Furthermore, McLean and McKay (1981) argue that use of the term informed consent is a tautology and consent necessarily means that the patient has been adequately informed (p. 98). These arguments will not be considered further in this paper. Instead, the term informed consent is used to refer to the specific definitions of informed consent given by Faden and Beauchamp (1986). Purpose of informed consent Those advocating the principles of informed consent argue that its purpose is to protect patient autonomy or self-determination. Kirby (1983) states: The fundamental principle underlying consent is said to be the right to self determination: the principle or value choice of autonomy of the person. (p. 70) However, there is no agreement as to how autonomy is defined and these varying definitions are well documented in the literature (Yeide 1992, Beauchamp & Childress 1994). The implications for nursing of th
More Less

Related notes for PHL 302

Log In


OR

Don't have an account?

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.

Submit