Dr. Kostelecky - Philosophy 249 - 16

2 Pages
82 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Philosophy
Course
PHIL249
Professor
Matthew Kostelecky
Semester
Fall

Description
PHILOSOPHY 249 ST. THOMAS AQUINAS SummaTheologia▯: Treatise on God Question 2: Does God Exist? Article 1: Is the existence of God self-evident? Article 2: Is the existence of God demonstrable? Article 3: Does God exist? ———————————————————————————— for a moment, going back to last class on Being and Essence... Glossary: Potency: essence, first actuality Actuality: being, second actuality Aristotle's analogy for understanding the soul. If the eye were a body, what would be the soul of this body? Sight. Sight is its first actuality. The second actuality is seeing. When the eye is closed, or I am sleeping, I have the first actuality of sight. When I awake and look I am actualizing that, second actuality: seeing. IN GOD,THERE IS NO DISTINCTION BETWEEN FIRSTAND SECONDACTUALITY - in God, there is no distinction between potency and actuality—no composition between what he could do and what he is actually doing. Quidity: the nature. quiditative knowledge - predications on a similitude. i.e. Human is rational animal. ———————————————————————————— because of time constraints, we deleted a reading: question 1 of this treatise. question 1 is about the relation between philosophy (including all sciences and mathematics) and theology. Do we need theology? Aquinas says yes we need theology. BUT, Aquinas project becomes turning Theology into a Natural Science. THIS IS ABOUT METHOD. Question 1: a) philosophy is good. b) that being said, it is not alone sufficient. c) I am going to turn theology into a science. this goes the way of any basic aristotelian science (so this is the context, Aquinas is trying to establish Theology as a science): Q1: Method Q2: Is God? Q3: What God is (not). Question 2: 1. Is God Self-Evident (per se nota - is it known through itself / in itself)? No. 2. Is God Demonstrable? Yes. 3. Does God Exist? Yes. he doesn't think God is self evident, but that doesn't mean he is indemonstrable. For something to need to be demonstrated it must not be self-evident. There is some pessimism and some optimism mingling here. Science in an Aristotelian form is all about demonstration. Demonstration for Aristotle is syllogistic: Socrates is a man, men are mortal, therefore Socrates is mortal. For Aristotle, the paradigm of science is the demonstratio▯. Syllogism: [major premise, proposition] [minor premise, proposition] [conclusion, proposition]
More Less

Related notes for PHIL249

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit