EQ 2 Mitigation and Summary

3 Pages
61 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Geological Sciences
Course
GEOL 2390
Professor
William M.Last
Semester
Fall

Description
Earthquakes Continued... MITIGATION • lateral spread/flow failure: avoidance, zoning, excavation (if small) • général liquéfaction/bearing strength loss: engineering designs: ◦ drainage, grouting, artificial compaction, deep foundation ■ expensive!! ■ small area only Summary EQ Hazards Mitigation 1. community preparation/education 2. land use management 3. EG engineering/design -- retrofitting, reinforced concrete, etc. 4. EQ prediction/EQ control 1. Community Preparation • Mexico City 1985 : perception of EQ hazard very low: no preparation 2. Land use management • simplest, most direct way of reducing losses - simply don't live, build in eq prone ar- eas • options if aware of risk: ◦ refusal of rebuilding/renovation permits construction of critical structures ■ classic example: Bodega Bay Nuclear Plant 3. EQ Engineering/design • most deaths caused by collapse of man-made structure • technologically possible construct building to withstand operate-strong (6-7) eq but 50% more expensive ◦ result - most EQ prone areas under coded ◦ San Fernando 1971: 90% of buildings collapsed exceeded building code ◦ Caracas 1967: much new construction in previous 10 yr (i.e. modern build- ings) ■ most rigid code ater Calif ■ total collapse 5 high rise ■ major structural damage 500 other 30 story buildings ◦ biggest upgrading problem ■ 30% of population lives/works in high risk zone ■ $$$ • general: ◦ sufficient spacing ◦ no ornamentation ◦ rectangular vs. complex ◦ steel reinforced concrete 4. EQ Prediction/Control • only within past decade • last 5 years major advances but still elusive appraoaches 1. long-term analysis seismicity/recurrence rates • ID seismicity gaps ◦ plot historical seismic activity on spatial basis ◦ much used before 60s but with advent of plate tectonics ◦ two possibilities ◦ slow release of strain (creep) ◦ strain accumulating (release in major quake) • ◦ i.e. gap may be the most hazardous • • gaps: nothing about how large, how often statistical analysis of historical records: develop
More Less

Related notes for GEOL 2390

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit