Study Guides (238,628)
Canada (115,262)
Psychology (602)
PSYCH 354 (6)
Online. (1)

PSYCH354R - Exam Study Notes (3).docx

51 Pages
Unlock Document


CHAPTER 1: What do We Want to Know about Intimate Relationships? Interdependence as the Cornerstone for Relationships • Interdependence: the mutual influence that two people have over one another. (Defining feature of any relationship) • Interdependence has to be bidirectional (operates in both directions) • Interdependence must extend over time, with later interactions between partners gaining meaning from the earlier interactions • Interdependence between two people does not constitute an intimate relationship • People in intimate relationships treat each other as unique individuals Impersonal and Personal Relationships • Treat each other as unique individuals • Impersonal relationships: formal and task oriented • Personal relationships: informal and engage us at a deeper emotional level. (an interdependent relationship in which the partners consider each other special and unique) Close Relationships • The close relationship is one of strong, frequent, and diverse interdependence that lasts over a considerable period of time. Intimate Relationships • Characterized by strong, sustained, mutual influence across a wide range of interactions, featuring at least the potential for sexual interaction Why are intimate relationships important? • The human capacity for intimacy contributes to our ability to regulate our emotions and adapt to the world. • How we feel and think about our relationship can contribute to how long we live following a serious health related event • Hand Holding study: o 16 married women, lay in a MRI scanner o If shown a X have a 20% chance of receiving a small shock o If shown a O, 0% chance of receiving a shock o Conditions: holding partners hand, holding strangers hand (same sex as partner), holding no hand o Results:  Registered less threat when holding partners hand  The happier they were in their relationships, the less activation occurred in the threat related brain structures. • Heart Failure study: o 188 couples dealing with one partners heart failure (over 50yrs old) o Visited the couples homes and interviewed and gave questionnaires in separate rooms o At the end, videotaped for 10 minutes talking about a topic of disagreement in their relationship o Counted the number of times they said positive and negative things to one another. o Patients in happier relationships were less likely to die in the next four years. Intimate Relationships Determine the Survival of our Species • Fitness is affected directly or indirectly by the ways human mates attract and select one another, their willingness and tendency to procreate, the attachments they form, and their provision of support for one another and their offspring • MRI scans taken while gazing in a partners eyes show brain activation in regions that are known to be stimulated when we receive a reward. • Sexual desire and romantic love are biologically distinct systems, joined in part by a neuropeptide called oxytocin and is released during intimate physical contact. • Oxytocin may be a key ingredient in the neurobiological system that promotes feelings of calmness, sociability and trust partly by reducing activity in fear related brain structures such as the amygdala and hypothalamus Intimate relationships are a Universal Human Experience • People everywhere experience intimate relationships • Pair bonding: often motivated by love and mutual attraction. (Most common reason people have sex) • Different factors (ex. cultural) can modify how we experience these relationships • China: associate love with sorrow, unrequited feelings, and infatuation • North America: associate love with passion and personal happiness o Western cultures prioritize personal goals over duties to the larger group and its opposite in Eastern Cultures. • Individualistic and collectivist societies experience love differently o Ex. individualistic: the family is a support system for the individual, who leaves home and starts their own family. o Individuals are the support system for families in collectivist societies • Love marriages are happier than arranged marriages. How Marriage has changed over time • Shifting from being an institution in which social obligations are most important to a form of intimate companionship in which the emotional bonds are most essential. • The responsibilities of marriage were once institutionalized by religious and legal codes and closely regulated by social norms and sanctions. • This shift is due to: o Industrialization and the growth of cities decreased the degree to which families depended on children to sustain the family unit o Increased geographic mobility reduced the degree to which parents and families could monitor and influence their children o Growing power and increasing opportunities for women gave them greater economic independence and more control over their personal decisions • Large increase in cohabitating couples. Intimate Relationships Expand our Range of Emotional Experiences • Love is not a defining characteristic of an intimate relationship • Passionate love: marked more by infatuation, intense preoccupation with the partner, strong sexual longing, throes of ecstasy, and feelings of exhilaration that come from being reunited with the partner • Companionate love: potent feelings diminish but are enriched by warm feelings of attachment, an authentic and enduring bond, a sense of mutual commitment, the profound knowledge that you are caring for another person who is in turn caring for you, feeling proud of a mate’s accomplishments, and the satisfaction that comes from sharing goals and perspectives Seven Essential Attributes of Love 1. Desire: Wanting to be united with the partner, physically and emotionally. 2. Idealization: Believing the partner is unique and special. 3. Joy: Experiencing very strong, positive emotions. 4. Preoccupation: Thinking a lot about the partner and having little control over when these thoughts occur. 5. Proximity: Taking steps to maintain or restore physical closeness or emotional contact with the partner. 6. Prioritizing: Reordering priorities and goals, so that maintaining the relationship is given more importance than other interests and responsibilities. 7. Caring: Experiencing and expressing feelings of empathy and compassion for the partner. Intimate Relationships Affect our Mental and Physical Health • Subjective well-being: reports about how happy we are generally in In life—is linked with various aspects of our intimate relationships • Relationship status relates to subjective well-being. • Relationship transitions: movement into and out of partnerships • Relationship difficulties increase substance abuse, depression, and suicide • Selection effect: people with specific characteristics may be more likely to enter into certain types of relationships or undergo particular transitions raising the possibility that these characteristics, rather than the relationships themselves, cause their well-being. • Protection effects: Something about the experience itself produces protective benefits or advantages. How do relationships affect your subjective well being? • Affects financial well being: o Long time married couples have more money than other couples o Divorce is expensive • Married and cohabiting couples have more sex. • Affect physical health o People experiencing unresolved conflicts in their intimate relationships are more vulnerable to catching a common cold after being exposed to an experimentally administered virus o Cardiovascular, endocrine, and immune functioning all are affected by observed levels of conflict and hostility in intimate relationships Intimate Relationships Affect the Well Being of Children • Parents’relationship status is more influential than their race and their education in determining whether their children will experience severe Poverty. • Children are upset, by high levels of conflict between the parents that decrease the children’s feelings of emotional security and increase such behavior problems as acting out and displaying aggression with their peers • Relationship conflicts can lead parents to withdraw emotionally from one another and from their parental duties o Conflict can: reduce quality of children’s sleep, speedup the onset of puberty, and compromise their physical health. • Transitions in relationships: more transitions = more behavioral problems o Child’s well being improves following divorce if the parents marriage before had high levels of tension and conflict. • Intergenerational transmission effects: the family circumstances children encounter will influence the way they manage their own intimate relationships decades later. • Genes do not play a factor Intimate Relationships are the Fabric of Society • Social control theory: social relationships organize and regulate how individuals behave, such that fewer, weaker, or poorer relationships increase the occurrence of deviant behavior. • This regulatory effect occurs because relationships encourage individuals to internalize and abide by societal norms, in part because people incur personal costs and sanctions when these norms are violated. • Intimate relationships in adulthood also affect whether people follow or break laws or social conventions CHAPTER 2 - We need a system for evaluating claims about how relationships work and determining which claims are true for most people and which are not - Relationship science is the tool for answering these questions - The primary tool is scientific method: a set of procedures for making predictions, gathering data, and comparing the validity of competing claims about the world (The Scientific Method) - scientific method is not foolproof, it demands we remain skeptical of all claims to the truth - must reject claims that no longer match our observations and advance new claims - continuous process of conducting research THREE KINDS OF QUESTIONS - these three questions motivate most research on intimate relationships 1. First question focuses on description – asks what happens? (Initial questions researchers ask). Example: who is more likely to initiate a breakup, a man or a woman? 2. Second, focuses on prediction – asks when does it happen? (asks whether knowing something about a relationship at one point in time can help us predict what the relationship will be like at some future time) 3. Third focuses on explanation – asks why does it happen? (can point out ways that relationships reach those outcomes and methods of changing or improving them) THEORIES AND HYPOTHESES Theory: general explanation of a phenomenon - Variables: the elements of a theory - to measure a good theory, is it falsifiable: testable predictions that can be confirmed or disconfirmed through systematic observation Hypotheses: is a concrete prediction arising from the theory – about how different variables are likely to be associated - The scientific method values replication: research that examines the same questions multiple times CHOOSING A MEASUREMENT STRATEGY - social scientists tend to theorize about variables that are intangible - Psychological constructs: product of human thoughts, i.e., love; poses challenges – how can we measure abstract ideas? - Researchers must link abstract ideas to something concrete that can be observed or measured  operationalization: the translation of an abstract construct into concrete terms in order to test predictions about that construct - Example: “love scale” – those who give higher scores more likely to end up staying married 15 yrs later. - With psychological constructs such as love, the construct itself is not actually measured; research can only measure operationalizations of constructs SELF-REPORTED MEASURES - self-reports: own descriptions and evaluations of one’s experiences * most commonly used source of data in research on intimate relationships - simplest self-report is a direct question with a yes or no answer - Sociosexuality: willingness to contemplate sex outside the context of a committed intimate relationship - Fixed-response scales: researcher determines all of the specific questions and possible answers i.e., sociosexual orientation inventory & marital locus of control scale - Open-ended Question: researcher asks questions and respondent gives any answer that comes to mind - Qualitative Research: an approach that relies primarily on open-ended questions and other loosely structured information PROSAND CONS (OF SELF-REPORT) Pros - require few equipment - high construct validity - convenient Cons - difficulty in phrasing the questions (can affect how people respond) - people forget things and cannot recall with detail example, how many time you spoke on phone last week… - cannot provide meaningful answers if question is misinterpreted - reluctance to answer a question truly when it makes participant look bad - Social desirability effect: refers to the possibility that research participants are giving answers they think will make them look good to the researchers, rather than describing what they actually know OMNIBUSAND GLOBAL MEASURES - Omnibus Measure: taps a wide range of context, example: The Marital Adjustment Test (15 questions that range in variety of content) - Item-overlap problem: occurs whenever questionnaires that are nominally measuring different constructs contain questions about similar topics  To solve this problem use global measures: measures that ask partners only about their evaluations (feelings) of their relationship as a whole OBSERVATIONAL MEASURES - observational measures: gather data about relationships without having to ask the people who are experiencing the events - Example: The Spouse Observation Checklist (8 page measure that asked spouses to indicate which of the hundreds of specific behaviours i.e., took the garbage out… their partner engaged in) - How good are spouses at reporting on each other’s behaviours? - Jacobson & Moore (1981) found that partners agreed about which behaviours had occurred less than 50% of the time = spouses not very accurate observers of each other - sentiment override: reports of partner behaviour reflects general feelings rather than behaviours themselves - Physiological responses: the body’s involuntary reactions, to experiences in intimate relationships - in study by Art Aron and colleagues (2005) found area of brain associated with reward and motivation lit up more brightly when partner gazed at their loved one vs. looking at photo of stranger - Biggest challenge in designing observational measures is establishing reliability - Reliability: the extent to which different observers agree that a specified behaviour has or has not occurred PROSAND CONS (OF OBSERVATIONAL MEASURES) Cons - extremely time consuming and labour intensive (must train observers and compensate them) - require expensive recording equipment - possibility of reactivity: sometimes the act of observing someone changes the behaviour being observed (couples behaviours tend to change a little when being observed) Pros - high construct validity - offers objective record of what happens in relationships - less opportunity to rely on faulty or limited memory (reports given during or immediately after observations) WHICH MEASUREMENT STRATEGY IS THE BEST? - if a researcher wants to understand how partners in an intimate relationship feel or think = use self-reports (ask them) - if researcher wants to understand how partners act or communicate = use observational methods (watch and listen) - the best research adopts a multiple-method approach: operationalizing the constructs of interest in different ways, so that the limitations of each measurement strategy may eventually cancel each other out and the effects the researcher is really looking for can emerge clearly DESIGNING THE STUDY Correlational Research: study the naturally occurring associations among variables - aimed at answering descriptive questions “are more intelligent ppl more satisfied with their intimate relationships?” - when two variable are shown to be associated in some way = correlated - positive correlation: indicates that when one level of variable is high, the level of the other variable tends to be high as well *same if low - negative correlation: high levels of one variable tend to be associated with low levels of another - correlation of zero = knowing one variable tells you nothing at all about the other variable PROSAND CONS (OF CORRELATIONAL RESEARCH) Pros - valuable for studying variables that cannot be manipulated or studied in other ways Cons - supports only certain kinds of conclusions - Correlational data cannot be used to support statements about causation: idea that one event is the direct result of another **correlation does not imply causation! > Cross-sectional data: the data describes a cross section or a snapshot of a single instant (particular moment/time) > Longitudinal data: measurements of the same individuals at two or more occasions LONGITUDINAL RESEARCH - can address questions of description and of predictions - measures ppl and then measures them again later to see what happened - in research, to describe how relationships change, the interval between measurements need to be long enough so that some change can occur - Daily diary approach: asks ppl to fill out a questionnaire everyday at about the same time - Experience sampling: gather data from ppl throughout the day, literally “sampling” from the totality of their daily experiences PROSAND CONS (OF LONGITUDINAL STUDIES) Pros - longitudinal studies can describe change over time and predict outcomes - offers a unique window through which to observe how relationship processes unfold Cons - expensive and time consuming - loss of participants due to moving away, break-up, boredom… - Attrition bias: when the final sample in a longitudinal study differs from the initial sample because certain kinds of couples have dropped out EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH - Experimental research: researchers take more active role through manipulating one element of a phenomenon to determine its effectiveness on the rest of the phenomenon - Conducting a true experiment requires 4 things: dependent variable, independent variable, control, and random assignment - dependent variable: the effect or outcome the researcher wants to understand - independent variable: the aspect of the experimental situation that the researcher manipulates - control: hold constant across conditions – all aspects of the experimental situation that they are not manipulating - random assignment: ensuring that every research participant has an equal chance of being assigned to any condition of an experiment PROSAND CONS (OF EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH) Pros - allows researchers to move beyond descriptive and predictions to address explanatory questions - can support causal statements Cons - Cannot generalize outside the experimental condition - What works in the experimental setting does not always work in the real world - external validity: whether the results of an experiment apply in other situations ARCHIVAL RESEARCH - Archival research: researcher examines existing data that has already been gathered, for an unrelated purpose, by someone else - Archival resources – yearbooks (looking at faces determines marriage satisfaction later), personal advertisements - Content analysis: code material in such a way that researchers can quantify differences between units PROSAND CONS (OF ARCHIVAL RESEARCH) Pros - economical and effective - just as accurate as conducting an entirely new study Cons - cannot control quality of the data - researcher can only examine the questions asked in the original study CHOOSING WHO GETS STUDIED - Sample: the people who provide data - Representative Samples: samples consisting of people who are demonstrably similar to the population to which the researchers would like to generalize - Convenience Sample: samples recruited solely because they are easy to find i.e., university students on campus THE IMPORTANCE OF DISCONFIRMATION - Scientific research is focused on disconfirming the null hypothesis: the hypothesis that there is no effect between two variables (the correlation is zero) - Statistical Analysis: to determine the probability of obtaining a particular result, given a particular set of conditions - Statistically significant effects: effects large enough to occur less than 5% of the time – if the null hypothesis were true - Meta-analysis: a set of statistical techniques specifically designed to combine results across studies and reveal the overall effects observed by a body of scientific research ETHICAL ISSUES - Ethical behaviour entails: 1. respect people who provide data 2. protect participants from possible harm - Confidentiality: ensuring info is not shared or discussed with anyone not directly associated with research - Anonymity: identifying participants with identification numbers rather than their names 3. Researchers not allowed to ask potentially offensive questions or place participant in situation they may feel uncomfortable - To avoid, use informed consent: participants told of all research procedures, know what to expect, and have signed consent form CONCLUSION - the scientific method is simply a set of tools for evaluating competing claims about the truth CHAPTER 4: Men and Women, Gay and Straight Sex and Gender • Sex: whether an individual is male or female, biologically speaking. Categorically fixed. (Doesn’t change) • Gender: people’s non-biological and non-physiological attributes, characteristics, and behaviors that are viewed as masculine or feminine. More fluid. (Can change) • Primary sex characteristics: different chromosomes, sex hormones, internal and external genitalia thatare needed to accomplish sexual reproduction. • Secondary sex characteristics: breasts, finer skin, and more subcutaneous fat for females; facial hair, deep voice, and greater musculature for males develop later, and these serve to further distinguish the two sexes anatomically and to facilitate courtship and mate selection. • Tertiary sex characteristics: primary and secondary characteristics are themselves embedded and experienced within particular historical and cultural circumstances, which then combine to produce the social behaviors that men and women typically learn and the situations in which they are permitted to display them Sex Differences, Sex Similarities • D statistic. When d = 0, this means men and women do not differ on the characteristic • When d deviates from zero, we can conclude that men and women do differ. • The further d deviates from zero, the more confident we are that these differences are robust and meaningful. • Negative d values indicate that females score higher than males on the specified dimension; positive values indicate the opposite. • Regardless of the domain, differences between males and females are not large. The Nature explanation • Evolutionary theory • Intrasexual competition: compete with other members of their own sex to gain some advantage in the mating market o Men and aggression: attain resources, protect their resources and family, impress women o Women: enhancing their looks, putting down other women The Nurture Explanation • Social structural theory: male-female differences in the division of labor are profoundly important for two reasons • One reason focuses on how differences in the division of labor affect expectations for the roles in society that men and women should fill, and the second focuses on the steps men and workmen then take to meet these expectations. • Women: roles where they are caretaking, selfless, and friendly • Men: action and task oriented roles or authority figures • When people go outside these prescribed roles, they may encounter friction. • In our society, and in virtually all societies in which males and females have a hierarchical relationship with one another, males adopt the dominant role and females adopt the subordinate role • Power: an individual’s capacity to alter the behavior and experiences of others, while also resisting the influence of others • Men engage in behaviors that establish and reinforce their superior position in the social hierarchy; in contrast, women engage in behaviors that promote cooperation, nurturing of others, and adaptation to the inferior role to which they are assigned. • Males and females are distributed differently across various tasks and occupations because their physical attributes push them toward certain tasks and occupations and away from others. • The division of labor and how we make sense of gender are also affected by the demands of the local economy as well as the social structure of a given society. • The roles adopted by males and females can vary and change, depending on such factors as how many males and females are available to take on particular tasks at a given time and how males and females are treated in a particular culture. • In cultures where women experience higher levels of empowerment, differences between how much men and women emphasize a mate’s earning prospects and domestic abilities are reduced. • Power may derive not from gender, but from the roles that males and females inhabit. • Women tend to be more engaged and demanding because their typical roles provide them with less power, whereas men tend to withdraw because they inhabit roles distinguished by more power. (Men and women will switch to opposite behaviors if their power role is changed) Study • When doing an experimental study where people are asked to infer others emotions, women outperform men if the instructions make it clear that the task is about emotion and empathy. (Empathy is part of the stereotype of being a woman) • When participants are paid for accurately perceiving others’thoughts and feelings and when men are instructed that empathic accuracy increases their romantic appeal to women men and women no longer differ. • A nurture-based view of parenting holds that men and women are equally capable of providing care to their children if they are socialized with that role. Joining Nature and Nurture • Some sort of integration between these two explanations is needed to fully articulate the wide range of factors contributing to sex differences and the development of gender. • Gender roles are influenced by: o Biological factors such as hormones and body parts o Societies expected roles for men and women o Each individuals psychological thoughts and beliefs about how males and females should act factoring in gender stereotypes o Emotions and attitudes towards the same sex and opposite sex. o Individual initiates intimate relationships with members of one sex or the other • Links between basic biology and emotion: levels of testosterone and other hormones affect emotions (depending on family relationships) • Girls with more positive family relationships go on to have a later onset of puberty • Girls with a disorder that leaves them with unusually high levels of androgens, beginning in the womb, show a much greater preference for boys’toys Sex Role Identity: Finding individuals in the Categories • Sex role identity: the way people view themselves in terms of masculine and feminine traits • Androgynous: Individuals who are high in both masculine and feminine traits o Higher levels of self-esteem, lower levels of anxiety, and higher levels of emotional intelligence o Display and express their emotions more readily o More likely to adjust their behavior according to the demands of the situation o Experience higher levels of attachment security in relationships • Unmitigated agency: Extreme masculinity • Unmitigated communion: extreme femininity o Experience distress because they rely heavily on others to bolster their self-esteem, o Become over-involved with others in order to maintain a positive sense of who they are o Fail to learn how to manage their own emotions • Masculinity and femininity can change • Sex and sex role identities also serve as schemas—cognitive categories that organize ideas and beliefs about certain concepts, in this case sex and gender. • These schemas alter our perceptions of others and how we relate to them Sex, Gender, and Intimacy • Men are more group oriented and care more about the welfare of a larger group • Women care more about the welfare of a select few close others. Relationship Awareness • Women tend to have more relationship awareness than men do. • Women develop more differentiated and complex cognitive representations of relationship events, allowing them to recall prior experiences with the partner with greater ease and more emotional richness • Because they are capable of accessing a greater store of relationship knowledge women might be inclined to see connections among relationship events that are not as obvious to men. Quality of Interaction • Men’s interactions with men are less meaningful (or more superficial) than those with women, whereas women’s interactions are equally meaningful regardless of the partner’s gender. • When spouses reported on how much stress they experienced and how much partner support they received each day over the course of a week, husbands’stressful days were met by increases in support whereas wives’stressful days were met by increases in support and increases in criticism. • Women who are partners of cancer patients experience far more distress then men in the same situation. Meanings of Intimacy • Men and women seem to enter relationships with similar standards in mind but, perhaps by virtue of women’s greater sensitivity to the emotional tenor of dyadic relationships, men end up being closer to having their standards met. Study • Male and female undergraduates were asked to describe an intimate experience, and researchers then analyzed those responses without knowing the respondent’s sex. • This study found clear similarities in how men and women understood intimacy. • Women understood intimacy to mean feeling and expressing appreciation and enjoyment (100 percent of them listed this), feeling and expressing love (38 percent), feeling mutual interest and attraction (31 percent), and receiving support (28 percent). • Men were similar in that they listed feelings of love and enjoyment (at least 92 percent of them did), mutual interest and appreciation (54 percent), and mutual support (28 percent). • Men and women were also quite similar in their mention of physical contact (44 percent and 46 percent, respectively) • Men were seven times more likely than women to mention sex Sex and Physical Intimacy • Early in heterosexual relationships, men and women are similar in how much sex and closeness they desire. • Men’s desire for sex does not decline much as time passes, but their desire for closeness does (women are the opposite) • Men are more likely to initiate sexual contact in their intimate relationships, and women are more likely to refuse this contact • Men’s sexual dissatisfaction in their marriage increases the chances that they will engage in extramarital affairs Relationship Dissolution and Its Aftermath • Eventual marital disruption is better predicted by data collected from women than from men though this disparity tends to weaken as spouses describe their relationship as less traditional and more egalitarian • Women are more likely to want a divorce • In dating relationships as well, women tend to be the “last in and first out,” whereas men tend to be the “first in and last out” • The period of greatest stress for women occurs before the relationship dissolves; for men, their stress peaks after the relationship has ended • Financial costs for women are offset by gains in well-being. This is why women fair better after a breakup/divorce. • Men enter new partnerships more quickly, and in higher numbers, than do women • The death of a spouse takes a greater toll on men than women, and this effect is stronger at older ages Gay and Lesbian Relationships • Some people don’t label themselves as gay, straight or bisexual. Similarities and Differences among gay, lesbian, and Heterosexual relationships • These relationships are more similar than different. • Because they value equality more and have fewer built-in power differences associated with their sex, homosexual couples divide household tasks more equally than heterosexual couples do and they display more effective problem-solving Context • Contextual influences—that is, the forces existing beyond the partners and their interactions—shape and guide our intimate relationships • Have the challenge of discovering and establishing—for themselves and the people around them—that they are homosexual and that their experiences in developing an intimate identity will take place outside the heterosexual mainstream. • Once two homosexual partners are in a partnership, they may differ in the extent to which they have informed others about their sexual orientation (Adds tension to the relationship) • Homosexual people must come to terms with having a sexual orientation that can be the subject of scorn and ostracism. • Gay and lesbian couples are often deprived of even the simplest and most routine ways of expressing intimacy in public, such as holding hands or kissing good-bye. • Do not receive the same level of societal and familial support • 1 in 3, report that their family or a member of their family has refused to accept them because of their sexual orientation • When gays and lesbians dissolve their relationships, they are more likely than heterosexuals to remain connected to their ex-partner, to see them socially, and to maintain a friendship with them Sexuality and Monogamy • Regardless of sexual orientation, relationship happiness is higher when partners are more sexually active, and sexual activity typically declines the longer a relationship continues • Sexual activity is highest in relationships involving two gay men • Gay men are more accepting of open or non-monogamous relationships and are more likely to participate in them. • Sex is less frequent in relationships involving two women Relationship Dissolution • Same-sex relationships are more likely to dissolve than opposite-sex relationships, and lesbian relationships are more likely to end than gay relationships • Although a transformed legal status may well provide homosexual partners with new rights, “this group’s lower exposure to normative pressure to maintain lifelong unions” may explain their higher dissolution rate • If women actually are more attuned to the quality of emotional connections in their relationships and more likely to take steps to end the relationship when problems arise, then we could predict that relationships involving two women are more likely to end • Approach relationships with high standards because of the equality between partners, hard to meet those standards CHAPTER 5 Attraction: Why We Like Some People but Not Others - Attracted to people who poses positive traits- dislike those with negative - More attracted to good people than fun - Pratfall effect: people were perceived as more attractive when they did a great job and were a bit clumsy- endearing flaws Similarity: Liking People Who Are Like Us (pg. 205) - How their qualities resemble our own qualities - Phantom other technique: - in study when they have more things in common with that person they find them more attractive - Similarity with beliefs and values, there isn’t much research done based on personality - When it comes to personality; complementarity that matters not similarity - Why? Smiliar people are validating, reinforce our beliefs and interests - If they are similar to us, they are easy to get along with – less disagreements - We expect them to be like us Familiarity: Liking What We Know (pg. 208) - Prefer stimuli we’ve been exposed to before - Mere exposure effect: being exposed to something can make it instrincally enforcing Reciprocity: (pg. 209) - People report more likely for partners in studies if they have heard that person likes them too - Not all liking is equally rewarded though; attraction is developed over time by actions - Most liked when persons opinions started out negative but gradually won over - The people who like us without knowing us are usually easy to please PhysicalAppearance (Pg. 211) - Dance study: college students randomly chosen to participate- after dance the only thing that predicted if they would go out again: if they were perceived as attractive - Doesn’t matter what they had in common/ values/beliefs - Matching phenomenon: tendency for people to pair up with partners similar to them in appearance - More matching for people who assumed they’d be rejected - Even least attractive people (indicated by themselves) wanted to date the most attractive people - When looking for a real date some wouldn’t approach those that seemed out of their league - When it comes to appearance there are countervailing forces; like rejection, desire for relationships that create this matching phenomenon Why Does it Matter? - We tend to assume if they are attractive other aspects of their personality is as well - In a number of ways beautiful people have it made easy; - May lead attractive people to become more sociable - People are more likely to lie about themselves when talking to attractive people - No correlation between attractiveness and health Long-Term vs. Short Term Relationships (pg. 219) - Preferred: short term more based on appearance - Strategic pluralism: idea that humans developed the capacity for short/long term relationships based on their circumstances - Sexual strategies theory: predict what sort of qualities men and women are likely looking for in long/short term - Men and women can benefit from both types of relationships - Men in short term relationships: low standards (less attractive, less intelligent) – traits that would seem undesirable for a long term relationship - Women in short term: looking for attractive, able to spend money on them, - For long term relationships women are willingly to have a less attractive male, in exchange for dependable - Men have high standards for long term relationships Romantic Attraction and Situations (pg. 222) - Shaky Bridge- when walking across males were approached by an attractive female who showed a picture, and then gave her number inviting the men to call her later if they had any questions- same was done on a regular road - Males on the bridge: sexual theme stories, images, more likely to call woman back - Misattribution of arousal: the fact that we make error in our judgement of what’s arousing us- men took being scared by the bridge as attraction to the female - Similar when closing time at the bar; individuals becoming gradually more attractive as the night goes on- changes in themselves perceieved as more attractive - Men: higher standards at church vs. The bar Unrequited Love (pg. 225) - When we are romantically attracted to someone who is not attracted in return - Rewarding for the lover in 3 areas; - They believed the object was exceptionally desirable – capacity to reward is high - They believed their feelings would eventually be returned - Simply being in love was rewarding - If they love faithfully enough- they will win the affection of the other person - Stalking; college females being victims Mate Selection (pg. 229) - No relationship between what people say they want in a partner and what they actually go out and get - In identitical twin study; others were not attracted to siblings spouse - Partners must select each other ( not like clothing) Proximity (pg. 232) - On a campus study; the closer you lived, the more likely you were to form a friendship - Likelyness of being friends rose from the distance of how far away your door was - Simply have more opportunities to have interactions with each other - Best known predictor for marriage: geography – tend to marry people who live close to home First Moves: Signalling Availability and Interest (pg. 234) - One person behaved indicating attraction - “ I am here... looking for potential partner” – males act dominant (punching) or competence (games) – females use sexual characteristics (makeup, hair, dressing) - Women are more likely to participate in non-verbal behaviours - Procepitivity; anticipatory behaviours - And how women and men engage when in conversation - Behavioural synchrony: people who are attracted to each other tend to mimic each other’s movements subconsciously - Use of nonverbal indications: relationships can be scary and dangerous, you don’t want to be rejected - Nonverbal communication can send mixed signals Self- Disclosure: Knowing and Being Known (pg. 237) - Social penetration theory: the development of a relationship is associated with the kind of personal information they share - Breadth: variety of materials discussed and depth: personal significance - More likely to share personal info once someone else does - Disclosure reciprocity: people share equally revealing things to each other - The exchange of mutual disclosures appears to balance when sharing new information with a partner – they both get to know each other better - People who expose their information to early on in a relationship are seen more negatively OR if they expose this information to everyone they meet Courtship: Developing Commitment (Pg. 241) - Staircase model: describe relationship forming in 5 steps. The first four; initating, experimenting, intensifying, integrating = use of disclosure and the last step is family and friends who view the two partners having formed a committed relationship and finally marriage - Problem with the step system is relationships rarely work in stages, most have events that either increase or decrease level of commitment (ie. Moving in together) CHAPTER 6: Abbreviation …IR= Intimate Relationship IRs are defined in part by how partners treat one another, and many speculate that these behavioural interdependencies emerge from personality characteristics that partners possess. And when two people join together in a relationship their characteristics and individual histories BOTH combine to affect the path their relationship will follow. Personality- distinctive qualities that characterize an individual, that are relatively stable over time and across situations, that have some coherence or internal organization to them, and that influence how the individual behaves in and adapts to the world around them. Lewis Terman - first to study the causes of relationship success and failure through the partner’s personalities and temperaments in the late 1930s. Believed that the lacking qualities for compatibility in one or both partners was the reason for unhappiness in a marriage. His results were flawed however in the sense that personality and relationship data were taken at the same time- therefore making them unclear of whether they were a consequence of the relationship quality or the reason for it. Trait approach is used by researchers to study relationships (or anything else) to identify a core set of personality traits by conducting extensive statistical analysis of adjectives people use to describe themselves or others. Big Five Model of Personality- (consensus that 5 traits are needed to capture personality differences in people) Neuroticism- inclination to experience unpleasant and disturbing emotions Extraversion- preference for social interaction and lively activity Openness- receptiveness to new ideas, approaches and experiences Agreeableness- selfless concerns for others; generous sentiments, trusting Conscientiousness- degree of discipline and organization Effects on Personality Traits on IRs There are various ways that traits might affect IRs. Many findings linking personality to interpersonal functioning concern traits that govern how emotions are experienced, regulated and expressed. Even measures of personality taken in childhood contain information about our relationships later in life. Examples Children who display relatively frequent and severe temper tantrums before age 10 are twice as likely to divorce compared to their counterparts with more even tempers. Women also with more tantrums in childhood are more likely to marry men with lower occupational status. Kids judged to be more aggressive at age 8 are also more likely to divorce. Those who are relatively anxious, passive and prone to mood swings go on to have marriage with lower satisfaction  Even kids as young as 3 if judged to be “undercontrolled” (aka restless, impulsive, easily frustrated and moody) are more likely to experience more turbulence in their relationships with others and more interpersonal conflict at age 21. As well as more problems in general and social difficulties. Personality traits are relatively stable forces that operate continuously in the background in our relationships. Personality traits seem to set the boundaries within which a relationship unfolds while also affecting the ways that the two partners perceive and talk to one another. Individuals high in neuroticism or negative affectivity (those who dwell on their own negative qualities as well as those of others and the world in general) appear to be particularly vulnerable to poor relationships. It was found in a study by Kelly and Conley that neuroticism in partners who were engaged to be married was greater in those who went on to be unhappy in their marriage and in those who later divorced. It was also found that unhappy spouses are more likely to proceed to divorce (rather than remain unhappily married) when the husband was more outgoing and impulsive… When the husband’s have personality traits that make them prone to engage in behaviours that undermine the relationship – such as drinking, infidelity, and financial irresponsibility. They concluded that “Neuroticism acts to bring about distress, and the other traits of the husband help to determine whether the distress is brought to divorce or suffered passively (in a stable but unsatisfactory marriage). Partners who are rated more agreeable or more conscientious tend to be happier in their relationships. Personality factors appear to operate by determining the general range of functioning experienced in a relationship. IE- couples with low levels of agreeableness and high levels of neuroticism tend to have lower levels of satisfaction across time compared to couples with the reverse. Then, within this broad range of functioning, how well the partners communicate with each other appears to determine whether their relationship deteriorates. People low in agreeableness often complain about being treated with condescension and a lack or consideration. Peps high in neuroticism are more likely to city self-centeredness, jealousy, and dependency as difficulties in their relationship. Also they tend to interpret the partner’s negative behaviors in a more critical light than people low in neuroticism. Individuals tend not to pair up with someone who has similar personality traits. More similar in terms of religion, intelligence and political stand point than personality traits. However, it is found that the MORE SIMILAR the partners’personalities are, the HAPPIER the relationships are generally- particularly when they are similar in agreeableness and openness. But although there are associations between specific personality traits and relationship satisfaction, there is no extra disadvantage to 2 neurotic partners compared to one neurotic partner; or nor does an extra advantage come with two agreeable partners. How does NegativeAffectivity Affect Relationships? Murray’s Dependency Regulation Model demonstrates that individuals with low self esteem underestimate how favorable their partner views them. Definition-- a model addressing how individuals in IRs balance their desires for closeness to those of their partners, with the recognition that intimacy also leaves them vulnerable to being hurt or betrayed. Applied to explain how individuals with low self esteem may sabotage their relationships by underestimating how favorably their partners view them. 4 PHASES- 1. Low Self- Esteem- chronic low self esteem creates difficulties for a relationship. ex. constantly having to reassure low self esteem partner, low self esteem partner not taking compliments or believing the person that’s saying them. 2. Underestimating the Partner’s Regard for Self- they assume that their partners do not regard them highly and think that others hold the same pessimistic views. As a result they become overly cautious in their approach to relationships- often to reduce risk of rejection- thus creating a distance that makes them even less likely to feel secure with their partner. 3. Perceiving the Partner in an Unfavorable Light and Expressing Discontent – the mistaken belief that the partner does not truly love them leads individuals with low esteem to look for evidence that their belief is true. At the same time, tend to see rejection even where it does not exist and start to devalue their partner as a protective strategy. They are more sensitive to threats in the relationship and express more anger and sadness after disagreements. These usually escalate into arguments then. 4. Perceiving Relationship in Unfavorable Light – Murray found over a 12 month study of couples that partners of people who were especially sensitive to rejection became less happy with the relationship as time passed… How Early Experiences in the Family Affect Our Intimate Relationships- Intimate bonds are fundamentally important to the welfare of individuals and to any children they might be raising. The weakening and disruption of these bonds affects the development of children and their subsequent relationships. Social scientists call the family you were raised in the family of origin. Intergenerational transmission effects refer to the effects our family of origin has on who we are as individuals as well as on who we are as relationship partners later in life. Conflict and Divorce Affects in the Family The experience of divorce differs for different individuals and families. There are 5 conclusions that has emerged from research into the ways parental marriage and divorce affect individuals as they develop through childhood to adolescence and into adulthood. 1. The adverse effect of divorce on children are evident in a range of domains, including- self- esteem, academic achievement, conduct and behaviour, psychological adjustment and social relationships. 2. The magnitude of these effects can be interpreted in different ways. On one hand, studies show that parental divorce approximately doubles the risk of adverse consequences among their offspring. But this doesn’t mean that divorce = unhappiness in kids. Although 20-30 % of kids from divorced familes experience adverse outcomes, about 10-15 % of children from INTACT marriages also do… very similar. 3. Children are affected by divorce because the dissolution of marriage threatens the family’s economic circumstances and parental mental health, reduces the amount and quality of contact the child has with one parent (typically father or both), and makes the family vulnerable to new kinds of stresses. Despite the best intentions, the quality of parenting often suffers following a divorce, and family instability increases the chances that a child will not receive the monitoring, emotional support, and discipline that he/she needs. 4. Important to recognize that children can have difficulties in the absence of divorce and that high levels of conflict between parents are often correlated with these effects. Studies have shown that children exposed to higher levels of parental conflict in adolescence were lower in self- esteem, happiness, and life satisfaction in early adulthood than those who experienced low parental conflict. 5. The well-being of adult offspring depends on a complex combo of whether the parents divorced and what the marriage was like before that divorce. Kids are better off when a highly conflicted marriage is terminated, but surprisingly, there are harmful consequences of dissolving marriages low in discord. One explanation for this is “out of the blue” divorces that strike kids particularly hard in the short term and undercut their willingness and capacity to develop trusting relationships in the long term. Children of Divorce and Their IRs The understanding of intimate relationships begins not when two individuals meet, but when their parents meet and create a new family. Children of divorce show more caution toward marriage and more acceptance of divorce. There are many differences between individuals about the after affects of divorce. Because offspring from divorced family backgrounds are more likely to drop out of high school and are less likely to attend college, they enter adulthood with fewer economic resources. Kids exposed to divorce and martial distress also tend to have less fulfilling and supportive relationships with their parents, even later in life- father-child relationships are particularly fragile. Children of divorce experience more relationship distress and dissolution. Kids whose parents were unhappy in marriage are likely to follow the same pattern. This tendency appears to be true regardless of parents’education, income, religion, and whether they subsequently divorced. The most compelling explanation holds that children learn about relationships from seeing how family members relate to one another, so the interpersonal styles they learn while growing up carry forth into adulthood to affect later intimate relationships. By observing and interacting with their parents and family members, children acquire emotional and behavioural models that then generalize to relationships outside of the family. It is suggested that individuals with risky family backgrounds seem particularly likely to benefit from early educational programs designed to strengthen their communication for this reason. How Early Experiences with caregivers Affect Our Intimate Relationships. Attachment theory- an influential theory of IRs proposing that the relationships we form in our adult lives are shaped largely by the nature of the bonds that we form with our primary caregivers in infancy and early childhood. Attachment behavioural system- an innate, biologically based system that monitors and regulates the distance between individuals and their attachment figures, motivating efforts to restore connection with attachment figures when the relationship is threatened or temporarily disrupted. th In the first half of the 20 century, raising children with love and affection wasn’t viewed as important and beneficial to a child’s development. Instead it was believed that they should be raised to keep their emotions controlled and their behaviour shaped through rewards and punishments. The combined work of Harlow, Bowlby and Ainsworth proved the profound importance of care-giver child attachments and to the enduring effects of these bonds on how individuals viewed themselves and others over the course of their lives. Universal Attachment Children of any primate species are highly dependent on their caretakers for survival, and human infants take an especially long time to develop from their state of high dependence to on of relative independence. The attachment behavioural system operates to help ensure the developing child’s survival through this period by keeping the kid close to the parent, according to the attachment theory. The caregivers’presence and protection promotes experience of felt security and allows the child to explore and learn. At this point the attachment behavioural system prompts the child to evaluate whether it is possible to restore closeness, with the caregiver. If it is possible, the system is said to be hyperactivated, leaving the child highly vigilant for signs of threat and abandonment, highly active in mobilizing behaviours to signal and attain proximity to caregiver and insistent that the attachment figure remains available. If the child does not have the option of restoring proximity with the caregiver, then the attachment behavioural system instigates deactivating strategies that turn off or inhibit the drive to restore closeness with the caregiver. Inhibits emotional expression, and aims to distance him/her self from others. Individual attachment Different caregivers and different children interact in different ways, and these interactions lead children to form different impressions of themselves and others. Bowlby claimed infants who are exposed to responsive caregivers (warm, and sensitive -esp when the infant needs comforting) come to believe that they are worthy of love and attention of others and that others are generally caring and dependable. Infants exposed to inconsistent or harsh caregivers who are controlling, unpredictable, or overly intrusive in times of need- will come to believe the opposite. Attachment theory states that, whether the positive or negative, these experiences are stored in working models (internal psychological structures representing the conscious and unconscious beliefs, expectations, and feelings people have about themselves, others and relationships). These influence how new experiences in our relationships are selected, interpreted, and integrated into our sense of who we are. These can change based on the experiences we face. These experiences may result in generalized expectations regarding the availability and support that others are likely to provide. Adults differ along two main dimensions. One being the tendency to experience anxiety in the face of perceived threats to the attachment relationship (this corresponds to the negative model of self) and the other being the tendency for avoidance in the face of attachment- related anxiety. 1. Secure- positive view of themselves and others. Comfortable with closeness and intimacy. Value relationships but they can maintain their sense of independence as well. 2. Preoccupied- positive view of others so they value closeness, but they have a low sense of worth, which leads them to be chronically in anxiety. Come across as needy- depend on others to reassure them and fear rejection immensely. Rejection would confirm their doubts about themselves. 3. Dismissing- have positive views of self, but negative of others. Do not dwell on rejection or experience attachment- related anxiety. They tend to avoid closeness and minimize its importance. 4. Fearful- negative views of themselves and others- prone to avoiding intimacy and closeness. They want intimacy and to feel appreciated by others and cast out their doubts because they believe they are unworthy, yet at the same time, they struggle with the internalized sense that others are unlikely to provide the affirmation they need. It is proven that people do in fact seek closeness with and benefit from attachment figures when they are threatened in some way. Also individuals experience greater feelings of security in relationships when the partner is viewed as more supportive and responsive. Research also supports the idea that attachment representations can change when disruptions occur in the caregiver’s availability and behaviour. How do Individual Differences in Attachment affect Intimate Relationships. Many ways to interpret the same even, and these various interpretations can take our conversations down different emotional pathways. Interpretations made by individuals with secure attachment styles will tend to minimize the impact of negative events… and interpretations made by insecure individuals will magnify the impact of these same events. ex. Fearful people- typically offer the most pessimistic interpretations for relationship events. People who typically keep tighter control over their emotions as a means of denying the importance of intimacy ( high in avoidance) experience less emotion in response to relationship events. Etc People with a secure attachment in infancy have more secure friendships at age 16, and experience more positive emotion in their intimate relationships and display less negative emotion when communicating with their partners by mid 20s. People with a fearful attachment show opposite pattern- closing off contact and perhaps jumping to conclusions about the relationships demise. Study shows that secure partners are more likely than insecure partners to signal their needs clearly, to expect that the partner will help address these needs and to make good use of the partner’s efforts to help. They are also more willing to help, show interest and display sensitivity to their partner’s distress. Attachment theory predicts that when the relationship with the partner is threatened that individuals will naturally signal needs for comfort and strive to maintain or restore felt security with the attachment figure… this is the case with secure attachments, but not insecure sometimes. Individuals prone to avoidance will adopt a defensive position, denying the need for support and using distancing strategies to cope with their distress for example. To test this Simpson assessed the attachment orientations of both partners in a study then told the female member that they were going to be exposed to an anxiety and distressful situation. She was then escorted to a waiting room where her partner was seated and their interaction was recorded while they ‘waited’. It was found that a secure woman became more fearful of the experience, they were more likely to turn to their partners for comfort and reassurance. Avoidant women were less likely to turn to their partner for comfort and their anxiety and fear increased, and in fact was less likely than the secure women to mention the impending stressful event to their partner at all. It was also found that secure men have more support and reassurance to the partner the more her anxiety increased, while support and reassurance diminished more and more from the avoidant men as the partner became more distressed. Conclusion Addressing the role of personality traits in relationships allow us to focus on how characteristics, like agreeableness, negative affectivity and self- esteem, can change the ways partners respond to one another. Individuals cannot be understood without referring to the interpersonal relationships they have experienced in the past or are experiencing in the present (relationship between the caregiver and child, family origin, and conflict between the parents – divorce or not). Chapter 7 Communicating Closeness: How Intimate Relationships Are Maintained Soldiers letter to wife • Glimpse of intimate bond coupes have formed and forces that maintain them • Relationships that man aspire to – full of: love, dedication, humour, trust, commitment, concern, kindness, compassion How Communication Promotes Intimacy • Newfound love can be exhilarating – partners deepen their bond through shared activities, become recognized as a couple by family and friends and ponder a possible future together – now it need to be maintained • Relationship maintenance refers to the routine behaviours and strategies partners undertake to help ensure that their relationships will continue o Involves taking steps that will keep a good relationship strong, avert declines or repair a struggling one • How do couples maintain their relationship? o Start with making revelations to one another – personal expressions and disclosures – and once relationships has matured focus is on more expressions and discourse of daily life and future plans o The key resides not simple in what one person reveals but in how the partner responds (see examples p. 287 – Box 7.1) How Expressions and Disclosure Maintain Relationships: The Intimacy Process Model • The intimacy process model (proposed by Harry Reis and Philip Shaver) provides a framework for thinking about intimacy in relationships – not in the sense that a relationship is wither intimate or not, but in the sense that the everyday exchanges taking place between partners can be understood as wither maintaining or thwarting the degree of intimacy in the relationship they have created o Main components:  Expressions and disclosures  How partner perceives and responds to them  Judgments that disclosing individual then makes about him/herself and the relationship o Intimacy is seen as a process – individual becomes to believe:  The partner understands core aspects of his/her inner-self, including important needs, emotions and beliefs  The partner validates, respects, or otherwise ascribes value to these core aspects of one’s self  The partner cares for and displays concern for his/her welfare  (See p. 288 figure 7.2 for outline) (also shown in lecture) o However, premature disclosures can be off-putting  Ex. Dishonest disclosures mislead others and fail to reveal who we truly are, and factual disclosures reveal less than emotional disclosures about our inner self and hence afford fewer opportunities for relationships to develop o Inviting someone into our “zone of privacy” does not guarantee that they will accept or respond in way we want  Our partners interpretive filter affects how he/she chooses to respond to our disclosures  Responsive disclosures can be understood through the words our partner says, how they are said, and when they are said  For an individual’s behaviour to be viewed as responsive he/she needs to: • Listen to the initial disclosure • Understand superficial meaning conveyed in disclosure and the more subtle meanings that might be hidden within it • Enact a sensitive response that reflects this understanding, perhaps including questions that allow discloser to elaborate on his/her feelings and experiences • Know whether, when and how to make the transition to another topic  The sensitivity and empathy our partner displays when responding to our disclosures hinges on the interpretive filter guiding his/her responsiveness • Filter itself is influenced by partners motives, needs, goals and fears • Without responsiveness the chain breaks o However, in the same way that an interpretive filer intercedes between the initial disclosure and the partner’s response, so too does an interpretive filter come between the partner’s response and the disclosing individual’s tendency to experience that response of validating, understanding and caring – may be most important filter in the intimacy process – because our empathic behaviours will not lead our partner to feel validated, understood, or cared for unless our partner encodes or experiences them as such  There is not always a simple correspondence between what we say and whether our partner then comes to feel understood, validated and cared for • This is because our partner views our behaviour through an interpretive filter, and this filter itself is affected by his/her motivations, needs goals and feelings o Interpretive filters are crucial in the intimacy process and to relationships generally Research Findings of the Process of Intimacy • Evidence supports intimacy process model o Ex. Withdrawal and disengagement appear to be particularly detrimental to relationships, particularly when one partner is expression feeling of vulnerability o Ex. Increases in self-disclosure predicted increases in perceived partner responsiveness, which in turn predicted increases in feelings of closeness o Ex. Growing evidence suggests that motives, needs, goals and fears figure prominently in intimacy process model and that they affect partners’disclosures and they ways they interpret one another’s actions o Disclosure is not a uniformly beneficial experience, it seems o It turns out that empathy is sometimes typical of relationships that are functioning well and sometimes typical of relationships that are functioning poorly  Ex. Researchers showed that accurate (i.e. empathic) perceptions of one’s partner’s thoughts and feelings can be costly if those thoughts and feelings might threaten or destabilize the relationship somehow o Being able to accurately detect the partner’s potentially damaging thoughts and feelings can elect behavioural responses that draw more attention to them, whereas glossing over them might circumvent negative exchanges in the relationship Summary of above on p. 293-294 Maintaining Intimacy – 5 Ways 1. Shared Activities • As we become more familiar with our partner and more accustomed to our relationship we settle into our own routines and the special glow we once experienced can diminish – “typical honeymoon- then-years-of-badness pattern” o Self-expansion model: 2 assumptions: people naturally seek to increase their capacity and efficacy as individuals to achieve their goals (“expand the self”) and intimate relationship are a common way that individuals attempt to accomplish self-expansion  Relationships are marked by a merging of two individuals possessions, resources, and identities o A key idea is that early on in developing relationships, partners typically disclose a lot of personal information, feel an intense sense of connection, and wonder with excitement about their future together – this cannot be sustained, however, an important transition occurs: opportunities for further self-expansion tend to diminish and emotional highs (and lows) that marked the initial phases of the relationships typically become more moderate (taking about average couples, not all) o Many couples need to find new ways to improve excitement and energy in relationship.  Short and long terms experiments where couples share novel, challenging and exciting activities  Conclusion:All partners made judgements of relationships satisfaction only those couples who participated together in the novel and exciting task experienced an increase in relationship satisfaction. Additional studies showed that activities like these also improve observed communication and that novelty of these shared activity is the most important aspect in procuring these effects  Another study found that exciting activities can produce reliable increases in relationship satisfaction, even outside of laboratory settings and that these effect is not due to the fact that couples may have found the exciting activities to be pleasant as well 2. Social Support • Intimacy process model • Social integration – social ties and connections • Social support is conceptualized most generally as responsiveness to another’s needs and, more specifically, as acts that communicate caring; that validate the others’worth, feelings or actions; or that facilitate adaptive coping with problems through the provision of information, assistance or tangible resources • Supportive behaviours are indeed characteristic of more fulfilling relationships and are likely to be a reliable way for partners to maintain their relationship • Generally, a larger literature shoes that the support people perceive to be available to them tends to be beneficial as they context with various stressors, whereas the support people actually receive is sometimes beneficial and sometimes detrimental o Visible support: support the recipient knows he or she has received (can be quite costly to the recipients self-esteem o Invisible support: support the recipient does not notice (more beneficial to recipient’s emotional state) 3. Capitalization • “Broaden and build” theory – maintains that the experiences and expression of positive emotions serve to (a) expand how we attend to, think about and respond to the countless events we encounter in our daily lives; and (b) build or amass the resources – including physical health, intellectual and creative capacities, spiritual connections, and social relationships – we need to maintain our well- being • Capitalization – the sharing of positive events in one’s life, builds personal and interpersonal resources because it allows us to relive the events, to see that others are pleased for us, to connect a given event with prior events in a relationship, and to experience ourselves being viewed favourable by others. o Hypothesized to yield important benefits • Active-constructive response • Passive-constructive response • Active-destructive response • Passive-destructive response o Suggests that when positive emotions are met with active, constructive responses, then the intimate bond between partners might be enhanced – at least in the shorter term, and perhaps in the longer term. o The failure to response to our partner’s everyday moments of satisfaction and triumph may represent lost opportunities to strengthen these memories and maintain our relationships, and responding passively or distractively may erode some of the goodwill we have established 4. Forgiveness • The person who has been wronged or let down must contend with the feelings stirred up by the act of betrayal, with thoughts about the foundation and future of the relationship, and with choices about whether to forgive the partner for the transgression (ex infidelity) • For complete forgiveness to occur, motivations have to shift on the intrapersonal level (silent forgiveness) and on the interpersonal level (hollow forgiveness) o See “spotlight” p. 304 • Forgiveness is a challenge in intimate relationships because partners adopt biased perspectives about the transgression • Forgiveness depends on 4 factors o Relatively minor acts are more likely to be forgiven than more sever acts o Victims who are generally more empathetic, agreeable, ad emotionally stable are more inclined to be forgiving as well o Apologies and expressions of remorse by the offender are likely to promote forgiveness, apparently because they encourage the victim to empathize with the offender o Forgiveness is more likely to the extent that levels of commitment and satisfaction are high between the offender and the victim (a lot invested in relationship) • Partners reporting higher levels of forgiveness also report more effective problem-solving skills, even after adjusting for their overall level of satisfaction with the relationship • Recent studies suggest that forgiveness for intimate betrayals progresses across 3 phases o Impact stage – partner learns of the transgression and begin to recognize the effect it has on them and their relationships  Great confusion and disorientations – filled with anger, recrimination and withdrawal o Meaning stage – victim tries to make some sense of why the transgression happened o Moving stage – the victim finds a way to adjust to and move beyond the incident 5. Sex and Physical Intimacy • Summary and Conclusion of chapter: p. 311-313 CHAPTER 9 Terminologies – • Belief – an idea or theory about what the world is actually like (“couples who fight a lot are probably unhappy”) • Value – an idea about what a person wants or what the wo
More Less

Related notes for PSYCH 354

Log In


Don't have an account?

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.