POLI 100 Final Exam Notes.docx

11 Pages
Unlock Document

Political Science
POLI 100
Christopher Erickson

POLI 100 Final Exam Notes Chapter 14: Sovereignty, the State and International Order State- a formally constituted, sovereign political structure made up of people, territory and institution (PTI). -Early “states”: political communities recognized as “states” formed around land and the Neolithic revolution, necessary to organize people/resources and protect them. State/International Systems- constantly in flux, never permanent. Civilizations and Empires- Comes in various forms. Large scale political systems made up of smaller political groups under a central power. Characterized by explicit relations of dominance and subordination. Earlies empires found in regions around Tigris, Euphrates, and Nile rivers, indicating significant role agriculture played in early civilization. • Ancient Greece: Organized in a system of city-states (polis), withAthens, the capital, as the model of a democratic city.Aristotle says “man is by nature a political man,” Thucydides often seen as a key figure of realism. • Roman Empire: Central to development of republicanism, gives origin to main legal systems and predominance of Christianity, in Europe. • Chinese Empire (18 BC- early 20AD): Interrupted by period of warring states, a time which allows for development of Confucianism- concerned with proper political/social arrangements for good order. -Modern empires: France, Spain, Portugal, Holland, Denmark, Belgium, Italy, Russia and Germany. However British Empire is by far the most influential empire. The reach of the British empire spreads British culture, political norms (ex. English’s predominance as international language). However post-WWII power shifted from the British to theAmericans. -Cultural transmission goes both ways and imperialism can be seen as allowing for the rise of globalization, in turn allowing for the rise MNCs, which are arguably becoming empires themselves. International relations- emerges post-WWI, with an initial focus on causes of war and conditions of peace (preventing another “Great War”), as well as relations between sovereign states (Westphalian model?). “World politics” is now replacing “international relations”, narrowing the concept. -Has since broadened to include political, social and economical factors. Also, non-state actors (NGOs, MNCs, organized crime/terrorist groups). Global- typically refers to whole world, tends to erase boundaries between states, instead emphasizing interconnectedness (ex. Climate change is a global concern, which must be dealt with by all countries). -This allows for a larger sense of community hinting at cosmopolitanism. -The movement towards globalization can be seen as a rise in the importance of the global political thought. Nation- a collective identity that is grounded in a shared history and culture and may or may not lay claim to some kind of political recognition as well as a specific territory. Empire (redefined): a nation-state that dominates other nation-states and exhibits one or more of the following characteristics: 1. Exploits resources from the lands it dominates 2. Consumes disproportionate amounts of resources relative to its population. 3. Maintains a large military that enforces its policies when subtle measures fail. 4. Spreads various aspects of culture (language, art, literature, etc) through its sphere of influence. 5. Taxes not just its own citizens, but also people of other countries. 6. Imposes its own currency on the land under its control. Modernity- basically moving from the Medieval time of retarded Church=Science thinking, into a more realistic, intelligible time. Emerges in Europe around 1500, in correlation with a rise in science and technology, in turn allowing for industrialization, increased military power and other social change. -Europe was lagging behind other civilizations, such as the Chinese and Islamic civilizations. However this allowed Europe to import readily available information, speeding the Modernity movement forward. -Europe was also highly fragmented except for the Roman Catholic Church, which was then fragmented by the Protestant Reformation (1519), leading to 100+ years of conflict. Treaty of Westphalia (1648): more or less concludes religious wars since 1519. -Establishes key characteristics of state and modern state system and includes the principle of religious co-existence, the state’s claim to sole authority (sovereignty) in matters such as the declaration of war and the negotiation of peace, diplomatic representation, and the authority to make treaties with foreign powers. Sovereignty- supposed to guarantee the state against external intervention in domestic affairs, which is nice in principle but unrealistic. The EU is an example of a necessary move away from sovereignty. -The right to humanitarian intervention trumps sovereignty -Systems of sovereign states tend to generate conditions of anarchy, since the mere existence of a ruler violates the notion of sovereignty. -The three characteristics of the modern state: sovereignty, territoriality, nationality. Concert of Europe-established post-Napoleonic wars, established in 1815, agreeing that European powers should meet regularly to discuss diplomatic issues. New states emerge, ex. Greece, Germany, Serbia, etc. Globalization of sovereign state system- as the colonial system collapsed at the end of WWII, decolonized populations began using their colonial borders to attempt to build nations. They participated in the international state system and adopted the European model. These events yielded a variety of weak, quasi, and failing/failed states: 1. Weak states- lack capacity to organize, regulate and deliver political and economic goods to their citizens 2. Quasi states- (R. Jackson 1990) are developing states dependant on foreign aid, harming their sovereignty. 3. Failed states- weak states that have reached a point of breakdown- social unrest and violence. Chapter 15: Traditional Theories of IR Liberalism and rise of IR: WWI introduces the idea of “total war”- the militarization of a state’s resources to their fullest capacities, all with the intention of annihilating the enemy. Total wars create demand for total peace. Woodrow Wilson (1913-’21 president) uses a liberal ideology to create post-war order. -Hugo Grotius (1583-1645): humans are naturally peaceful, the international sphere is sociable. -Samuel Pufendorf (1632-1694): natural law theorist, emphasized universal jurisprudence. -Immanuel Kant (1795ish): Perpetual Peace proposes a set of principles for a law of nations. Founds federation of free states, called “League for Nations”. He argues that it is too costly to a republic’s trade relations to go to war. -Thus, liberalism in IR operates on an optimistic view of human nature that sees humans as rational, and self-regarding, who progress over time towards a better state of existence through the actions of individuals. Treaty of Versailles (1919)- Establishes League of Nations, which is a disaster because of conflicting ideologies. Also expects Germany to pay an unreasonable amount in reparations, which they only finished repaying in 2010. Self-determination: 1. Right of states to freely determine their own policies and practices 2. Right of states to determine their own government 3. The quest of a nationalist group to secure political autonomy. -These originally applied only to Europe, then to S.America, then globally after 1945. Realism came to challenge the liberalism dominated field of IR after WWII Realism and IR: WWII sets liberalist IR back quite far, as the ideology is supposed to prevent total war, as it is against human nature. Realism instead emphasizes the way things are, not the way things ought to be.Also emphasizes the struggle for power in anarchic conditions. Formally emerged in 1930, but earlier roots can be seen: -Thucydides- weak consent what they must, powerful extract what they want. Therefore, the international arena is amoral, not immoral. -Niccolo Machiavelli (1467-1527): all actions are to be judged against the stability of the state -Thomas Hobbes (1588-1679): states exist in a state of nature, which is a “war of all against all” with regard to each other. -E.H. Carr (1892-1982): Considered to be the founder of “classical realism”, argued for primacy of power over ethics, “might=right” Carr’s Central Dyad of International Relations Utopianism Realism Free will Determinism Theory “ought” Practice “is” Intellectual Bureaucratic Left (progressive) Right (conservative) Ethics Politics -Carr says both must be considered, as utopianism on its own is useless but realism on its own results only in a struggle for power. -Hans Morgenthau, Politics Among Nations(1944), is pessimistic about human nature and believes politics trumps morality most of the time. -The international sphere does not have its own sovereignty to take advantage of, it does have other tools, such as the balance of power, deterrence and sociability- anti- social behaviours by one nation-state can harm its personal interests (ex. North Korea). Behaviorialism vs Normative analysis: Behavioralism arises in regard to IR post WWII, especially in the US. It rejects legal, historical and comparative studies in favour of quantifiable data, relying on the scientific method to produce objective knowledge (similar to positivism, which presupposes a neutral, eternally true knowledge of politics and IR. Normative analysis is concerned with norms, values and ethics. It does not claim to be scientific, challenging positivism and its claim of objectivity, noting the role a scientist’s bias can play. Some normative analysts claim that all knowledge is a matter of interpretation (postmodernism?). English School and the International Society Idea: English scholars who argued that IR theory was underdeveloped, and IR was itself a “society of states” . Rejects scientific approaches (ex. US) in favour of historical/normative ones. -Hedley Bull, the Anarchical Society (1977)- a society of states can be formed through their co-operation and pursuit of common interests and values. Bull went on to adopt a pluralist stance -However within the school there was debates regarding how feasible it was to develop a core set of norms. Could Eurocentric norms be exported? Some, like Bull, adopted a pluralist stance, while others adopted a more solidarist approach, which implies a broader commitment to the solidarity of human beings (similar to cosmopolitanism) -Revitalized post-9/11, as its concern with international order and justice involves state sovereignty, global human rights culture, and humanitarian intervention. Neorealism: (structural realism) emphasizes the structure of the international system instead of domestic politics. -Kenneth Waltz Theory of International Politics (’79), aimed for a more scientific theory of IR to generate testable hypotheses, emphasizing the international system as determining state behaviour. -Offensive realism- state constantly maximizes relative power (Mearshimer argues for this), defensive realism- the gathering of too much power by a state generates the security dilemma (Waltz argues for this). Neoliberalism: argues for free market economy, sees various non-state actors as having a significant role in international society. Security must be expanded to include not only military, but economic factors as well. The international system can be seen as characterized by complex interdependence. The Security dilemma: Mearshimer- great powers are trapped in an iron cage where they must compete for power to survive.An action taken by the state to secure itself provokes other states, thereby leaving the first state feeling less secure (think arms races) Relative vs absolute gains: J. Grieco (’88): liberals generally satisfied with absolute gains (comparing gains to prior capacity) whereas realists seek both absolute and relative gains (where gains are measured against the capacity of others). Chapter 16:AlternativeApproaches to International Relations Marxism- neither Marx or Engels wrote on IR, but were very influential on others. “False consciousness” similar to hegemony is spread globally by imperialism, misleading the working class and allowing for the exploitation of labour which is at the heart of the global economy. -Western Marxism vs authoritarianism Marxism: Lenin/Stalin/Mao develop Marxist ideas into “scientific socialism” which was exported to developing countries from USSR/China. -Vladimir Lenin (1870-1924): imperialism is the highest and final stage of capitalism, can be seen in the widening wealth gap between nations, by wars over land and resources. Universal class structure sets the stage for global class war. -Marx predicts fall of the capitalist system once cheap, exploitable labour depletes. We can see the proletariat taking their own initiative before this happens in the Occupy Movements. Dependency Theory: (Andrew G. Frank) explains underdevelopment in poor countries as a result of Western exploitation rather than local cultural factors. Independence is impeded because of the exploitative relations created by colonialism, ex. core-periphery relationships. World Systems Theory: (Immanuel Wallerstein) broadens dependency theory, questioning the assumption that the international system should be based on a nation-state model. Critiques social science’s narrow views of “development” Critical Theory: criticizes traditional approaches (liberalism, realism, conservatism), founded from Marxist thought. Often addresses the effects of capitalism on social life, emphasizing emancipation from social/material conditions that are oppressive. Antonio Gramsci (1891-1937): ruling classes maintain power by making inequalities seem natural (hegemony), so that the masses come to agree to their own oppression. Robert Cox: argues that realism is an ideology of the status quo which supports the existing order, and that there is no natural order immune to change. CT offers alternatives, ex Linklater and Habermas, and directly challenges the assumptions of neorealism through emphasis on constructed nature of social reality. Constructivism: argues that social order (beliefs, norms, values, etc) is an ongoing human production. That order is a product of human activity which happens through institutions, by habitualization through social practices. -Alexander Wendt: Anarchy is What States Make of It- challenges neoliberalism and neorealist assumptions about the state system and anarchy as given. The way we think about the world alters the way we act in the world. -Humans shape the world, which in turn shapes them- institutions (markets, governments, states, etc) have no existence or meaning except in the minds of those who believe in them. -Rationalist theories: human behaviour has an underlying rationality that leads human behaviour towards particular ends. Knowledge then is obtained through empirical investigation. -Reflectivist theories: (aka post-positivist/interpretive) rejects this. That’s it. Feminism and Gender Theory: Emerges in 60’s/70’s, comes to focus in late 80’s. contains many ideologies within itself, ex liberal, socialist, critical, etc.Addresses issues of patriarchy and the role of women in IR, noting tendency of traditional approaches to exclude women. -Considers war to be an exclusively male phenomenon, questions whether or not women are “secured” by the state in peace and war.Also questions how gender roles are constructed, and how they can be used to proliferate war (ex. Real men fight in the war!) -Feminist Typology I 1. Empirical feminism - focuses on correcting the misrepresentation of women as active agents in the international sphere based on mistaken assumptions 2. Analytical feminism – highlights the asymmetrical and socially constructed concepts of masculinity and femininity evident in traditional theoretical frameworks in IR that favour masculine interpretative practices 3. Normative feminism - incorporates reflection on IR theorizing and feminist concerns within a broader, explicitly normative agenda for global change -Feminist Typology II 1. Liberal feminism highlights the subordination of women in world politics but does not challenge the premises of traditional IR 2. Critical feminism builds on Critical Theory, examining relations of domination and subordination, the play of power in world politics, and the relationship between material and ideational factors through a gender-sensitive lens 3. Feminist constructivism often focuses attention on ideational forces and the essentially social nature of the international sphere 4. Feminist poststructuralism critiques the way dichotomies such as strong/weak, rational/emotional, and pub
More Less

Related notes for POLI 100

Log In


Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.