PHI 1101 Study Guide - Final Guide: Modus Tollens, Modus Ponens, Cephalus

• School: University of Ottawa
• Department: Philosophy
• Course: PHI 1101
• Professor: Laura Byrne

Document Summary

Information about the final examination: phi 1101 d, e, c, and m; fall, 2013. Deductively valid argument forms covered by the final examination: disjunctive syllogism, modus ponens, modus tollens, hypothetical syllogism. Formally invalid argument forms covered by the final examination: the fallacy of affirming the consequent, the fallacy of denying the antecedent. Material and associated readings covered by the final examination. 2: only: 2. 6; 2. 7; 2. 9; 2. 10; 2. 11; 2. 12. I and ii: focus: definitions of justice: rep. bk. I 327a-332c (cephalus and polemarchus); 336b-339b (thrasymachus); 342e-345a (the shepherd and the sheep); 351c-352b (no honour among thieves); 354a-c (socrates declares that the result of the discussion is that he knows nothing); 3: omit: section 3. 2. 2 and sections 3. 6 and 3. 7. Iii 412b-414c (the ideal city and its classes) Iii and iv: focus: rep. iii 415d-417b (housing and property. Arrangements for the auxiliaries and guardians); iv 419a-421c (adeimantus"s objection) 5-6: omit: 6. 1; defer until unit 6: 6. 7. 3 and self-test 12,