Study Guides (247,929)
Canada (121,167)
Philosophy (546)
PHI3170 (1)

Final 2013

2 Pages
Unlock Document

Daniel Kofman

Questions for Final Exam Daniel Kofman 1. If Locke is right, I probably need not worry that I am a brain in a vat. But is being a brain in a skull any better? True, this skull has seven orifices, “windows to the soul”, through which environmental influences enter, as they do on nerve endings at various points on my skin. So instead of a neurologist stimulating my brain, particles stimulate my sense organs which stimulate my brain. Is that any better an epistemic state? Have I any more reason to trust ideas about “the world” derived in this way than ideas implanted by a neurologist or evil demon? 2. Is there anything Achilles should have learned from the tortoise about deduction? Is there anything we should learn from the tortoise about induction? 3. Is Berkeley‟s idealism just the logical conclusion of Locke‟s and Hume‟s empiricism? 4. “A hallucination of a seaside beach can appear exactly like the visual appearance brought on by the actual presence of a seaside beach. It is reasonable then to suppose that in both cases one is directly seeing the same mental image; only the causes of each mental image differ.” COMMENT 5. What am I really seeing when I think I am seeing a chair? 6. “Hume‟s main interest in causation is to destroy the idea that we could have such knowledge [about a Straightjacket], and hence ever apprehend a Straightjacketing fact: we have no conception of it, nor any conception of what it would be to have such a conception nor any conception of how we might approach such a conception. In particular we must not think of the advance of science as targeted on finding such a thing. The lesson drawn from Newton is that just as Principia [by Newton] gives us the operation of gravitational force, but does not „tell us what it is‟, so any conceivable advance in science can only do more of the same. It can put events into wider and more interesting and exception-free patterns, and that is all. „The most perfect philosophy of the natural kind only staves off our ignorance a little longer‟ (Hume, Enquiry).” Simon Blackburn, “Hume and Thick Connexions”, pp. 244-245. Is it true that we can never have any conception of a Straightjacketing fact beyond the simple observation of the regularity of the phenomenon in question? Should we be troubled by this, and should it undermine our confidence in our inductive inferences? 7. “We… commonly ascribe to material things colours as we see colours, as they occur as elements in our experiential content, and again heat, cold, roughness, and so on as we feel the
More Less

Related notes for PHI3170

Log In


Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.