POL111 2 Study Questions.doc

3 Pages

Political Science
Course Code
Fiona Miller

This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full 3 pages of the document.
Questions on PS Chapters entitled “Theoretical Approaches” and “Comparative Methods” A. “Theoretical Approaches” 1. Describe three of the five theoretical approaches described in this chapter. (I’d like you to be able to recognize all the approaches, if you were given examples, but describing three will be enough.) What does each approach focus on? Make sure to explain terms that need to be explained (e.g. do not write that the institutional approach focuses on institutions without also making clear what institutions are). Try to take your points from the discussion in the text rather that the definition in boxes. To understand, you need to draw from the more detailed discussion. 2. Give an example of what a study following each of the approaches would be like. Either mention one of the examples given by Hague and Harrop or invent one of your own. 3. Discuss the limits or problems associated with each approach. For example: The Institutional Approach 1. The institutional approach to studying politics is a research method that focuses on political institutions. Political institutions are political organizations whose rules have been established in writing (often in constitutions) or through long practice. When political scientists talk about institutions they usually mean “the major organizations of national government, particularly those specifi1d in the constitution such as the legislature, the judiciary, and the executive.” The Canadian Houses of Commons and Senate (the legislative branch of government), the Canadian Supreme Court (the top tier of the judicial branch of government), and the Prime Minister and his Cabinet (the executive branch) are all institutions. Organizations that have grown through political practice, without being outlined in a written constitution, like the federal bureaucracy or political parties, can also be called institutions. One of the key assumptions made in the institutional approach is that “positions within organizations matter more than the people who occupy them.” What this means is that the institutional approach has us look at the roles or positions people fill rather than at the particular people with their particular quirks and ambitions; for e.g. if we follow an institutional approach we might study the office of the Prime Minister but we would not say anything about Stephen Harper as a person. We might learn the powers claimed by the office, and the limits faced by any PM trying to pursue his or her agenda, 1Rod Hague and Martin Harrop, Political Science: A Comparative Introduction, 7th Edition (New York : Palgrave Macmillan, 2013) 77. 2 Ibid., 78. but we would not look to discover particular personal traits of the person in office. Institutionalists argue that it is appropriate to focus on institutions rather than people because institutions matter, or make a difference. Institutions matter because they shape the behaviour of people within them, because they offer them a particular set of benefits and opportunities and create norms and rules that push p
More Less
Unlock Document

Only page 1 are available for preview. Some parts have been intentionally blurred.

Unlock Document
You're Reading a Preview

Unlock to view full version

Unlock Document

Log In


Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.