PSY100 Notes from Exam Review
Premium

6 Pages
123 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Psychology
Course
PSY201H5
Professor
Bruce Schneider
Semester
Fall

Description
Tuesday, Apr/6/2004 - Notes from Lab Exam Review Seminar ~ Semester 2 FORMAT Each Response will be graded out of 8 points: 4 Points – Content i.e. Relevance/Depth 4 Points – Literacy i.e. Expression/Organization Total of 4 Questions PASTEXAM QUESTION: 1. (2 Years Old) Describe the importance of the classical conditioning phase of training Sniffy to press a lever under continuous reinforcement conditions. What criterion did we adopt to decide if Sniffy had finished that phase? How would you decide that with a real rat? 2. Describe how practice effects and the difficulty of the distraction task were controlled for in the motor skills experiment. What were the reasons for controlling these variables? 3. Why are subjects asked to stare at a fixation point during the hemispheric specialization tasks? How is this critical to test the degree of lateralized function? 4. How did we measure the effect of distraction on eye hand co-ordination in the motor skills experiment? Describe the means by which we controlled for progressive and random error. Michael Thomas. Email: [email protected] Sample Questions Available: http://www.utm.utoronto.ca/~w3psylab/SLTQ.html Datasphere? Notes from Labs: LAB7: THEP SYCHOLOGY OR EADING GENERALABILITIRSEQUIRED FOREADIN:  Accessing info in LTM  Vocab, Word Knowledge (Matching – Meaning)  Integrating text info with that from LTM  (Process of) Understanding, Comprehension.  Inferences drawn from text (Literal Meaning/”Metaphorical”)  What can you deduce (abc)  Read between the lines  Logic, Inference  Recalling new text info in STM  Test yourself – reinforcement COGNITIVM ODEL– KINTSCH ANVAN DIJK(1978)  Most influential theoretical model of comprehension processes.  4 Cognitive Rescources necessary for reading and understanding: 1. Attention – a. Selection of important info b. Good Readers, know what to pay attention to. 2. Consciousness – Reader’s awareness of understanding (or not) 3. Decision Making (Key) – Inference and Integration for LTM (i.e context – too vs. two or red vs. green in exp.) 4. Memory – storage capacity and response production (verbal, written, etc)  Any decrease in ability leads to decrease in performance (i.e. capacity dictates performance – ability at each stage determines performance).  Familiarity in text eases comprehension. i.e. Simple Material – Grade 8 vs. University Level.  Readers with poor selection strategies have more difficulty.  Having a decided reading goal and texts with conventional structure increase readability and comprehension. LABT ASK:  Main Points of the Lab: 1. Identify component skills of reading comprehension. 2. Correlational Study a. If it isn’t a component skill, it won’t be correlated. b. Measure component skills and overall reading ability to see how they correlate. 3. Describe Tasks and what they measure  Inference –  Implied info that is not necessarily stated.  Task asks you to read 2 sentences and then asks if a certain word was present.  Was it there? 1st or 2nd word?  Was it implied?  Measure accuracy (#correct).  Did not measure key – RT when answering “no” when it was not.  Measure of Decision Making Skills  Cued Recall –  Study 40 pairs of words (3 seconds each).  Shown first word, asked to type in second as fast as you can.  Measure speed and accuracy.  Measure of Memory Skills  SAT Items  Reading Comprehension  Read 4 paragraphs, 1 @ a time.  After each paragraph, there are 3 ?s involving:  Main point (attention, integration)  Specific Detail (Memory)  Inferences drawn from text (Decision Making )  Based on real SAT test items, the 4 paragraphs reflect skills expected at university.  Measure of Reading Comprehension skills (all but metacomprehension  Metacomprehension:  Personal evaluation of one’s own reading abililty.  Measure awareness of how well you understand while reading.  22 ?s (scale answers: disagree/strongly)  7 categories  capacity – need ability  anxiety – level of stress  achievenment – importance of reading to you (lawyer vs. sketch artist)  Task – what is involved in reading  Regulation – how do you regulate reading when not understanding?  Locus – locus of control: internal/external o Locus – lay blame of credit to things that happen to you.  Strategy – awareness of how to improve reading ability.  Questionnaire widely used.  Calculate average sore in each category for reading ability.  Measure of consciousness. SCORING OTASKS:  inference – ount number correct out of 16.  Cued recall – number corret in trials 48-77 (out of 30) and trials 80-139 (out of 60)  SAT – each paragraph, write down reading time and number correct…..????  Metacomprehension – add up total scores for each of the 7 categories. PERCENTILRANK:  Statistical concept  Perce
More Less

Related notes for PSY201H5

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit