HLTC15 Study Guide - Midterm Guide: Convenience Sampling, Nuremberg Code, Quantitative Research
Document Summary
Interpretive: social science but not always history, political science, sociology, qualitative: inductive case study, ethnographic, document review. Refocussed social sci look at ways that meanings are constructured. Soft constructivist position- there are subjective and purely physical. Interpretivist: seeks understanding with a focus on subjective aspects to disease and treatment processes meanings and interpretation misleading-makes it independent of social relations subject but no generalizable. Complexity more focus on the depth of analysis not inference. Polical: by valuing neutrality concept it makes the research. Validity- high trustworthy and credible because it draws on research: observatory studies (participatory or non part, semi and structured interviews, focus groups, secondary analysis flexible and descriptive. Allows real accounts of nature and knowledge, conflict, subjectivity and ongoing struggle nuanced data represents rich, subjective experience, show differences and keep. No consensus of methods and data collection or analysis. See page 7 convenience sampling informants accounts are created by the researcher.
