TestNotes.pdf

14 Pages
293 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Management (MGS)
Course
MGSC14H3
Professor
Peter P Constantinou
Semester
Summer

Description
Contractarianism - makes a distinction between the state of nature and the state of society, with the state of nature being conceived of as pre-political. - Traditionally associated with libertarianism, democracy, and republicanism. Definition: Each person participating in a practice, or affected by it, has an equal right to the most extensive liberty compatible with a like liberty for all; and second, inequalities are arbitrary unless it is reasonable to expect that they will work out for everyones advantage, and provide the positions and offices to which they attach, or from which they may be gained, or open to all. Rawls believes that strength of his principles rests in the fundamental assumption of fairness as having primacy in any notion of justice. CRITICISMS: rational self-interest is the foundation for the contract. reasoning autonomous agency is what counts in the original position, as well as the capacity for abstract consideration of the principles of equality of liberty and difference. This excludes many classes of persons as well non-human sentient beings. 1 Loyal Agents Argument - Gulf had no reason to believe or suspect that the motive of the employee or officer involved in such use of corporate funds was anything other than a desire to act solely on what he considered to be the best interests of gulf and its shareholders. - What they did was admittedly illegal, but they meant well. Had good intentions, namely, to further the best interests of Gulf and its shareholders. - They would and do perform immoral and illegal actions with altruistic motives, i.e., there are people who would and do perform such actions with reasons they regard as good. - They are stupidly altruistic by hypothesis. Loyal Agents Argument 1. As a loyal agent of some principal, I ought to serve his interests as he would serve them himself if he had my expertise. 2. He would serve his own interests in a thoroughly egoistic way. 3. Therefore, as a loyal agent of this principal, I ought to operate in a thoroughly egoistic way in his behalf. AN AGENT = a person who is authorized to act for a principal and has agreed so to act, and who has power to affect the legal relations of his principal with a third party. - they are not distinguished from regular employees RELATIONSHIP : principal agent third party WHISTLEBLOWING Definition: 1. going public with information about the safety of a product 2. sounding an alarm from within the very organization in which [an employee] works, aiming to spotlight neglect or abuses that threaten the public interest 3. When the employee, without support or authority from his superiors independently makes known concerns to individuals outside the organization. 2 4. A whistleblower is an employee or officer of any institution, profit or non-profit, private or public, who believes either that he/she has been ordered to perform some act or he/she has obtained knowledge that the institution is engaged in activities which (a) are believed to cause unnecessary harm to third parties, (b) are in violation of human rights or (c) run counter to the defined purpose of the institution and who informs the public of this fact. - it is seen as a series of actions, not just one act - it is characterized as a mode of communication - Part being communicated is Safety of a product - Corruption, bribery, mismanagement, inefficiency - Activities believed to be causing unnecessary harm to third parties. - An action is harmful if it violates human rights. - Conflicting goals of institutions, their members and the public that generates the dilemma Involves accusation Loyalty of superior vs. the company which goals and objectives should you follow? WHY GO PUBLIC ON WHISTLEBLOWING? Individual not only seeks greater power, but seeks protection that public scrutiny brings. Anonymity is neutral, lying in the middle ground between secrecy and privacy: it entails that the public does not know or have access to the identity of an individual, but does not locate the burden of proof in withholding information. - Bad: Its seen as snitching behind someones back. 3
More Less

Related notes for MGSC14H3

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit