Study Guides (256,177)
CA (124,572)
UTSC (8,072)
MGS (98)
MGSC46H3 (13)

summary of articles on path goal theory

8 Pages
120 Views

Department
Management (MGS)
Course Code
MGSC46H3
Professor
Craig Weaver

This preview shows pages 1-3. Sign up to view the full 8 pages of the document.
Path-goal theory of leadership
-The contingency of the theory specify some of the circumstances in
which each of the behaviours is likely to be effective or ineffective.
-The essence of the theory is for leader to be effective engage in
behaviour that complement subordinates environment and abilities in
a manner that compensates for deficiencies and is instrumental to
subordinate satisfaction and work unit performance.
-Path goal theory concerns relationship between formally appointed
superior and subordinates. How superior affect the motivation and
satisfaction of subordinate.
-A theory of task and person oriented supervisory behaviour.
-individual will be effective if they complement the environment
(ensure subordinate can attain work goals so they will experience
intrinsic satisfaction and receive rewards)
Independent variables: leader behaviour
-2 general classes of leader behaviour: path-goal behavior and behavior
directed toward satisfying subordinates needs.
-House and Mitchell defined 4 kinds of behaviours:
1.directive path-goal clarifying leader behaviour
-behaviour directed toward providing psychological structure for
subordinates
-Reduce subordinate role ambiguity, clarify follower perception
concerning the degree to which their effort would result in successful
performance (goal attainment), and the degree to which performance
would be extrinsically rewarded with recognition by the leader through
pay, advancement, job security.
2.supportive leader behaviour
-behaviour directed toward the satisfaction of subordinates needs
-create a friendly and psychologically supportive work environment
-supportive leader is a source of self confidence, social satisfaction,
stress reduction and alleviation of frustration for subordinate
-Supportive leader behaviour was expected to increase performance
when behaviour was contingent on goal-directed effort.
3.participative leader behaviour
-Behaviour toward encouragement of subordinate influence on
decision making and work unit operation
-Participative leader was asserted to have 4 effects:
www.notesolution.com
a. concern effort and work-goal attainment; work-goal attainment and
extrinsic reward
b. increase congruence between subordinate goal and organizational goals
c. increase subordinate autonomy and ability to carry out intention
d. increase subordinate involvement and commitment and by increasing
social pressure of peers. => increase organizational performance.
4.achievement oriented behavior
-behaviour toward encouraging performance excellence
-Achievement oriented leader: cause subordinate to strive for higher
standard of performance and to have more confidence in their ability to
meet challenging goals.
Implicit assumptions and boundary conditions
-The initial path-goal assumed that role ambiguity is stressful and
unpleasant and reducing ambiguity will lead to subordinate
satisfaction and effective performance.
-Propositions concerning path-goal clarifying behavior are most likely
invalid when subordinates are under conditions of substantial stress or
uncertainty.
Empirical evidence relevant to measurement issues
-When the task demand of follower are ambiguous, nonauthoritarian
leader directive behaviour can be a source of clarification so
instrumental to both follower performance and satisfaction
-When task are unambiguous, supportive leader is predicted by path-
goal theory to have a positive effect on follower satisfaction and
motivation
-However, participative leader behavior is not necessarily useful under
such conditions
Proxies for theoretical moderator
-Followers whose jobs are satisfying, but which have unclear
performance demands, will view nonauthoritarian leader directive
behaviour as satisfying and instrumental for performance.
-The high level of ability at higher organizational levels should lessen
the instrumentality of leader defectiveness.
-Ambiguity of role and task demands and satisfaction increase and
routine decrease with increase in level in organization.
Legacy
www.notesolution.com
-Effective leader arouse motives that are relevant to particular
followers tasks.
-Motive arousal is equivalent to enhancing valence (attraction) of
particular kinds of behaviours and outcomes.
-As a result of motive arousal, intrinsic valence of behaviour and
outcome increase.
-Leader who enhance follower self-esteem and arouse follower
motives appeared to be similar to charismatic leader.
Axiom of the theory on page 335
Path goal clarifying behaviour
Leader behaviours that are capable of making subordinates needs and
preferences contingent on effective performance by clarifying:
(a)subordinate performance goals
(b) means by which subordinates can effectively carry out tasks
(c)standard by which subordinates performance will be judged.
(d)Expectation that other hold for subordinates
(e)Judicious use of reward and punishment, contingent on performance
-the acceptability and motivational effect of path-goal clarifying
behaviors depends on the tasks performed by subordinates.
-Path-goal clarifying behaviour will have most positive effect on
subordinates when subordinates role and task demands are ambiguous
and intrinsically satisfying.
-According to original path goal theory, have the following proposition:
Proposition 1:
-when the task demand of subordinates are satisfying but ambiguous,
path-goal clarifying behavior by superior will be a source of
clarification and subordinate satisfaction so will be motivational
Proposition 2:
-The higher the degree of subordinate self-perceived ability relative to
task demands, the less subordinates will view path-goal clarifying
behavior by superiors as acceptable.
Proposition 3:
-when the task demands of subordinate are ambiguous and
dissatisfying, path-goal clarifying behavior will be dissatisfying to
subordinates, will be seen as over controlling, will be resented and
therefore demotivational.
Proposition 4:
www.notesolution.com

Loved by over 2.2 million students

Over 90% improved by at least one letter grade.

Leah — University of Toronto

OneClass has been such a huge help in my studies at UofT especially since I am a transfer student. OneClass is the study buddy I never had before and definitely gives me the extra push to get from a B to an A!

Leah — University of Toronto
Saarim — University of Michigan

Balancing social life With academics can be difficult, that is why I'm so glad that OneClass is out there where I can find the top notes for all of my classes. Now I can be the all-star student I want to be.

Saarim — University of Michigan
Jenna — University of Wisconsin

As a college student living on a college budget, I love how easy it is to earn gift cards just by submitting my notes.

Jenna — University of Wisconsin
Anne — University of California

OneClass has allowed me to catch up with my most difficult course! #lifesaver

Anne — University of California
Description
Path-goal theory of leadership - The contingency of the theory specify some of the circumstances in which each of the behaviours is likely to be effective or ineffective. - The essenceof the theory is for leader to be effective engage in behaviour that complement subordinates environment and abilities in a manner that compensates for deficiencies and is instrumental to subordinate satisfaction and work unit performance. - Path goal theory concerns relationship between formally appointed superior and subordinates. How superior affect the motivation and satisfaction of subordinate. - A theory of task and person oriented supervisory behaviour. - individual will be effective if they complement the environment (ensure subordinate can attain work goals so they will experience intrinsic satisfaction and receive rewards) Independent variables: leader behaviour - 2 general classes of leader behaviour: path-goal behavior and behavior directed toward satisfying subordinates needs. - House and Mitchell defined 4 kinds of behaviours: 1. directive path-goal clarifying leader behaviour - behaviour directed toward providing psychological structure for subordinates - Reduce subordinate role ambiguity, clarify follower perception concerning the degree to which their effort would result in successful performance (goal attainment), and the degree to which performance would be extrinsically rewarded with recognition by the leader through pay, advancement, job security. 2. supportive leader behaviour - behaviour directed toward the satisfaction of subordinates needs - create a friendly and psychologically supportive work environment - supportive leader is a source of self confidence, social satisfaction, stress reduction and alleviation of frustration for subordinate - Supportive leader behaviour was expected to increase performance when behaviour was contingent on goal-directed effort. 3. participative leader behaviour - Behaviour toward encouragement of subordinate influence on decision making and work unit operation - Participative leader was asserted to have 4 effects: www.notesolution.com
More Less
Unlock Document


Only pages 1-3 are available for preview. Some parts have been intentionally blurred.

Unlock Document
You're Reading a Preview

Unlock to view full version

Unlock Document

Log In


OR

Don't have an account?

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit