Study Guides (256,360)
CA (124,630)
UTSC (8,092)
Philosophy (145)
PHLA10H3 (31)

Glossary of Terms

4 Pages
200 Views

Department
Philosophy
Course Code
PHLA10H3
Professor
William Seager

This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full 4 pages of the document.
PHLA10 Glossary
Abduction - A form of nondeductive inference, also known as inference to the best explanation. The Surprise
Principle and the Only Game in Town Fallacy are relevant to deciding how strong an abductive inference is.
Analogy argument a nondeductive inference in which one infers that a target object T has some characteristic
on the ground that T is similar to some other object A the analog), and A is known to possess that characteristic.
(e.g. Other galaxies probably contain life, since they are quite similar to our own galaxy and our own galaxy
contains life.) The strength of analogy arguments is an issue relevant to the Argument of Design and to the
problem of other minds.
Analytic An analytic sentence is one whose truth or falsehood is deductively entailed by definitions. Many
philosophers have held that mathematical statements are analytic. If a sentence isn’t analytic it is synthetic.
A posteriori a proposition that can be known or justified only be sense experience. An a posteriori argument is
an argument in which at least one premises is an a posteriori proposition.
A priori a proposition that can be known or justified independent of sense experience. An a priori proposition
can be known or justified by reason alone (once you grasp the constituent concepts). Truths of mathematics and
definitions are often thought to be a priori. An a priori argument is an argument in which all the premises are a
priori propositions. The Ontological Argument for the existence of God was supposed to be an a priori argument.
Argument from Design an a posteriori argument that God exists, advanced by Aquinas and Palely, criticized
by Hume. The argument claims that some feature of the world (like the simplicity of its laws or the fact that
organisms are intricate and well-adapted) should be explained by postulating the existence of an intelligent
designer, namely God.
Argument from Evil an argument that claims that the existence of evil shows either that there is no God, or
that God can’t be all-powerful, all knowing, and all good.
Axiomin mathematics, a starting assumption from which conclusions (theorems) are deduced.
Begging the question/Circularity an argument begs the question when you wouldnt accept the premises
unless you already believed the conclusion.
Birthday Fallacy the error in reasoning that one would make in thinking that “everyone has a birthday”
deductively implies that there is a single day on which everyone was born.
Causal argument for the existence of God an argument that Descartes gives in the Meditations for the claim
that God exists and s no deceiver: Since (1) I have an idea of a perfect being, and (2) there is at least as much
perfection in the cause as there is in the effect, it is said to follow that the cause of that idea must be a perfect
being, namely God.
Clarity/Distinctness Criterion Descartes maintained that if a belief is clear and distinct, then it cant fail to be
true. The reason clear and distinct ideas must be true is that God exists and is no deceiver.
Compatibilism the thesis that free will and determinism are compatible. Soft determinism is a version of
compatibilism. Hard determinism and libertarianism are incompatibilist theories.
Compatibility two propositions are compatible if the truth of one wouldn’t rule out the truth of the other. (e.g.
(1) this shirt is blue; (2) this shirt is torn. (1) and (2) are compatible. This doesnt mean that either is true.
Conditional an if/then statement. The if-clause is called the antecedent; the then clause us caked the
consequent.
Conservation law a law in physics that says that some quantity (like matter or mass/energy) can neither
increase or decrease in a closed system.
Contingent a being is contingent if it exists in some but not all possible worlds; a proposition is contingent if it
is true in some but not all possible worlds. You are an example of a contingent thing; though you exist in the
actual world, you could have failed to exist.
Counterexample a counterexample to a generalization is an object that refutes the generalization. A rotten
apple in the barrel is a counterexample to the claim “all apples in this barrel are unspoiled”.
Deductive validity an argument is deductively valid because of the logical form it has. A deductively valid
argument is one in which the conclusion must be true if the premises are true.
Determinism the thesis that a complete description of the causal facts at one time uniquely determines what
must happen next. There is only one possible future, given a complete description of the present. Newtonian
physics says that the behavior of physical objects is deterministic.
www.notesolution.com

Loved by over 2.2 million students

Over 90% improved by at least one letter grade.

Leah — University of Toronto

OneClass has been such a huge help in my studies at UofT especially since I am a transfer student. OneClass is the study buddy I never had before and definitely gives me the extra push to get from a B to an A!

Leah — University of Toronto
Saarim — University of Michigan

Balancing social life With academics can be difficult, that is why I'm so glad that OneClass is out there where I can find the top notes for all of my classes. Now I can be the all-star student I want to be.

Saarim — University of Michigan
Jenna — University of Wisconsin

As a college student living on a college budget, I love how easy it is to earn gift cards just by submitting my notes.

Jenna — University of Wisconsin
Anne — University of California

OneClass has allowed me to catch up with my most difficult course! #lifesaver

Anne — University of California
Description
PHLA10 Glossary Abduction - A form of nondeductive inference, also known as inference to the best explanation. The Surprise Principle and the Only Game in Town Fallacy are relevant to deciding how strong an abductive inference is. Analogy argument a nondeductive inference in which one infers that a target object T has some characteristic on the ground that T is similar to some other object A the analog), and A is known to possess that characteristic. (e.g. Other galaxies probably contain life, since they are quite similar to our own galaxy and our own galaxy contains life.) The strength of analogy arguments is an issue relevant to the Argument of Design and to the problem of other minds. Analytic An analytic sentence is one whose truth or falsehood is deductively entailed by definitions. Many philosophers have held that mathematical statements are analytic. If a sentence isnt analytic it is synthetic. A posteriori a proposition that can be known or justified only be sense experience. An a posteriori argument is an argument in which at least one premises is an a posteriori proposition. A priori a proposition that can be known or justified independent of sense experience. An a priori proposition can be known or justified by reason alone (once you grasp the constituent concepts). Truths of mathematics and definitions are often thought to be a priori. An a priori argument is an argument in which all the premises are a priori propositions. The Ontological Argument for the existence of God was supposed to be an a priori argument. Argument from Design an a posteriori argument that God exists, advanced by Aquinas and Palely, criticized by Hume. The argument claims that some feature of the world (like the simplicity of its laws or the fact that organisms are intricate and well-adapted) should be explained by postulating the existence of an intelligent designer, namely God. Argument from Evil an argument that claims that the existence of evil shows either that there is no God, or that God cant be all-powerful, all knowing, and all good. Axiom in mathematics, a starting assumption from which conclusions (theorems) are deduced. Begging the questionCircularity an argument begs the question when you wouldnt accept the premises unless you already believed the conclusion. Birthday Fallacy the error in reasoning that one would make in thinking that everyone has a birthday deductively implies that there is a single day on which everyone was born. Causal argument for the existence of God an argument that Descartes gives in the Meditations for the claim that God exists and s no deceiver: Since (1) I have an idea of a perfect being, and (2) there is at least as much perfection in the cause as there is in the effect, it is said to follow that the cause of that idea must be a perfect being, namely God. ClarityDistinctness Criterion Descartes maintained that if a belief is clear and distinct, then it cant fail to be true. The reason clear and distinct ideas must be true is that God exists and is no deceiver. Compatibilism the thesis that free will and determinism are compatible. Soft determinism is a version of compatibilism. Hard determinism and libertarianism are incompatibilist theories. Compatibility two propositions are compatible if the truth of one wouldnt rule out the truth of the other. (e.g. (1) this shirt is blue; (2) this shirt is torn. (1) and (2) are compatible. This doesnt mean that either is true. Conditional an ifthen statement. The if-clause is called the antecedent; the then clause us caked the consequent. Conservation law a law in physics that says that some quantity (like matter or massenergy) can neither increase or decrease in a closed system. Contingent a being is contingent if it exists in some but not all possible worlds; a proposition is contingent if it is true in some but not all possible worlds. You are an example of a contingent thing; though you exist in the actual world, you could have failed to exist. Counterexample a counterexample to a generalization is an object that refutes the generalization. A rotten apple in the barrel is a counterexample to the claim all apples in this barrel are unspoiled. Deductive validity an argument is deductively valid because of the logical form it has. A deductively valid argument is one in which the conclusion must be true if the premises are true. Determinism the thesis that a complete description of the causal facts at one time uniquely determines what must happen next. There is only one possible future, given a complete description of the present. Newtonian physics says that the behavior of physical objects is deterministic. www.notesolution.com
More Less
Unlock Document


Only page 1 are available for preview. Some parts have been intentionally blurred.

Unlock Document
You're Reading a Preview

Unlock to view full version

Unlock Document

Log In


OR

Don't have an account?

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit