Study Guides (258,843)
CA (125,022)
UTSC (8,106)
POLC38H3 (42)

E.D. Mansfield & Jack Snyder, “Democratization and the Danger of War,” International Security 20(1) (1995): 5-38

2 Pages
106 Views

Department
Political Science
Course Code
POLC38H3
Professor
Ingrid L.Stefanovic

This preview shows half of the first page. Sign up to view the full 2 pages of the document.
Democratization – Study Guide
Democratizing states are more likely to fight wars than are mature democracies or stable
autocracies
Anocracies: political systems in which democratic and autocratic features are mixed, o in which
very little power is concentrated in the hands of public authorities
The strength of the relationship between democratization and war varies depending on the length
of time that is analyzed
In the initial stages of expanding poltical participation, strong barriers prevent the emergence of
full-fledged democratic processes and the foreign policy outcomes associated with them. The
two main barriers are the weakness of democratic institutions (due to “transaction costs {pg20}
& collective action issues) and the resistance of social groups who would be the losers in process
of full-fledged democratization
In newly democratizing states without strong parties, independent courts, a free press, and
untainted electoral procedures, there is no reason to expect that mass politics will produce the
same impact on foreign policy as it does in mature democracies.
Praetorian society is where pressure for participation are strong but institutions for effective
participation are weak (decisions being made somewhere else rather than through the ballot box)
Many of the groups with an interest in retarding democratization are also those with a parochial
interest in was, military preparation, empire, and protectionism
The situation of social change, institutional weakness, and threatened interests tend to produce a
political impasse towards democracy; it is difficult to form coalitions with coherent policy
platforms or get enough support to stay in power. This causes short run thinking and reckless
policymaking that lead to war, occur for four reasons:
-Widening the political spectrum (different people with different views)
-Inflexible interests and short term horizons (groups threatened by social change and
democratization, (elites) are often compelled to take very inflexible views of their
own interests, especially when their assets can’t be readily adapted to changing
political and economic conditions.
-Competitive mass mobilization
-The weakening of central authority
www.notesolution.com

Loved by over 2.2 million students

Over 90% improved by at least one letter grade.

Leah — University of Toronto

OneClass has been such a huge help in my studies at UofT especially since I am a transfer student. OneClass is the study buddy I never had before and definitely gives me the extra push to get from a B to an A!

Leah — University of Toronto
Saarim — University of Michigan

Balancing social life With academics can be difficult, that is why I'm so glad that OneClass is out there where I can find the top notes for all of my classes. Now I can be the all-star student I want to be.

Saarim — University of Michigan
Jenna — University of Wisconsin

As a college student living on a college budget, I love how easy it is to earn gift cards just by submitting my notes.

Jenna — University of Wisconsin
Anne — University of California

OneClass has allowed me to catch up with my most difficult course! #lifesaver

Anne — University of California
Description
Democratization Study Guide Democratizing states are more likely to fight wars than are mature democracies or stable autocracies Anocracies: political systems in which democratic and autocratic features are mixed, o in which very little power is concentrated in the hands of public authorities The strength of the relationship between democratization and war varies depending on the length of time that is analyzed In the initial stages of expanding poltical participation, strong barriers prevent the emergence of full-fledged democratic processes and the foreign policy outcomes associated with them. The two main barriers are the weakness of democratic institutions (due to transaction costs {pg20} & collective action issues) and the resistance of social groups who would be the losers in process of full-fledged democratization In newly democratizing states without strong parties, independent courts, a free press, and untainted electoral procedures, there is no reason to expect that mass politics will produce the same impact on foreign policy as it does in mature democracies. Praetorian society is where pressure for participation are strong but institutions for ef
More Less
Unlock Document


Only half of the first page are available for preview. Some parts have been intentionally blurred.

Unlock Document
You're Reading a Preview

Unlock to view full version

Unlock Document

Log In


OR

Don't have an account?

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit