Study Guides (256,442)
CA (124,651)
UTSC (8,077)
Psychology (1,886)
PSYB30H3 (145)

complete transcription

2 Pages
63 Views

Department
Psychology
Course Code
PSYB30H3
Professor
Marc A Fournier

This preview shows half of the first page. Sign up to view the full 2 pages of the document.
Feb 14th, LEC 10, Week 6
Continuity speaks to the issue of P development to what extent does P develop and elaborate itself
over the lifespan? To what extent do the attributes we experience early in life remain the same as we
age from childhood to adulthood and then to later life?
All aspects of P develop over a life course not simply traits, but goals, our life narratives and so on,
are all in the process of developing.
Continuity means several diff things potentially, depending on the context. We will talk today about
continuity of individual differences. Also called differential continuity or rank order continuity
(which is simply to acknowledge at any given point in time you can rank order people on an attribute,
we can rank order people in terms of how extraverted they are, and its interesting to ask whether
that rank order stays the same over time?). We will distinguish continuity from coherence.
Coherence is a related idea but it is distinguishable. By coherence we are acknowledging that what
a trait looks like can change as we age what it means to be E at age 6 may not be identical to what
E looks like at age 56. Coherence acknowledges that the reference for a given construct changes over
time. The behaviors that served to indicate a particular construct may not be identical at 2 diff time
points. Well then, how can we infer/elucidate the underlying stability of P when its behavioral
expression changes? Coherence refers to the idea that there can be an underlying structure to
our P that remains the same even thought the expression to that attribute in our behavior
changes.
To say that if something is heritable, it should always be continuous, is wrong. One of the things that
is very important to stress is that these are conceptually and empirical separate topics something
can be heritable and not continuous and something can be continuous and not be very heritable.
(Will return to this topic later).
Analogy = there are all styles and shapes that arrows come in. We can document all of the various
features that distinguish one arrow from another. And thats not unlike the enterprise of Trait
Psychology, where youre trying to taxometrically classify the various attributes that people have and
the way they vary. But studying people is like studying arrows: to really understand how one
arrow is diff from another, you have to do more than just look at the anatomical differences b/w one
arrow and the next, you have to put one in a bow and then launch it bc arrows are best understood in
flight it is the nature of the thing that it be launched and it fly. And one arrow will reveal how its
different from another one by the trajectory it takes. And people are the same way we are all in
flight, we are all one a trajectory from the cradle to the grave, and the attributes we have are best
understood when seeing in the context of that trajectory. Attributes like E and N, frankly, they make
the most sense when you consider lives in context, lives that are moving from one place (which it to
say birth) to another place (which is to say death). We are so much better understood as lives moving
through time, the way arrows are better understood as mechanical feats running through space.
One of the ways of demonstrating the power of P Development (PDevo from now on) is to look at a
documentary series that has received critical attention over the past several decades. In the mid
1960s, a director name Michael Apted(?) began what became a landmark documentary film series.
He was very interested in the social class differences in Britain and the extent to which the social
classes to which people were born shaped, determined and pre-determined the various outcomes
1
www.notesolution.com

Loved by over 2.2 million students

Over 90% improved by at least one letter grade.

Leah — University of Toronto

OneClass has been such a huge help in my studies at UofT especially since I am a transfer student. OneClass is the study buddy I never had before and definitely gives me the extra push to get from a B to an A!

Leah — University of Toronto
Saarim — University of Michigan

Balancing social life With academics can be difficult, that is why I'm so glad that OneClass is out there where I can find the top notes for all of my classes. Now I can be the all-star student I want to be.

Saarim — University of Michigan
Jenna — University of Wisconsin

As a college student living on a college budget, I love how easy it is to earn gift cards just by submitting my notes.

Jenna — University of Wisconsin
Anne — University of California

OneClass has allowed me to catch up with my most difficult course! #lifesaver

Anne — University of California
Description
th Feb 14 , LEC 10, Week 6 Continuity speaks to the issue of P development to what extent does P develop and elaborate itself over the lifespan? To what extent do the attributes we experience early in life remain the same as we age from childhood to adulthood and then to later life? All aspects of P develop over a life course not simply traits, but goals, our life narratives and so on, are all in the process of developing. Continuity means several diff things potentially, depending on the context. We will talk today about continuity of individual differences. Also called differential continuity or rank order continuity (which is simply to acknowledge at any given point in time you can rank order people on an attribute, we can rank order people in terms of how extraverted they are, and its interesting to ask whether that rank order stays the same over time?). We will distinguish continuity from coherence. Coherence is a related idea but it is distinguishable. By coherence we are acknowledging that what a trait looks like can change as we age what it means to be E at age 6 may not be identical to what E looks like at age 56. Coherence acknowledges that the reference for a given construct changes over time. The behaviors that served to indicate a particular construct may not be identical at 2 diff time points. Well then, how can we inferelucidate the underlying stability of P when its behavioral expression changes? Coherence refers to the idea that there can be an underlying structure to our P that remains the same even thought the expression to that attribute in our behavior changes. To say that if something is heritable, it should always be continuous, is wrong. One of the things that is very important to stress is that these are conceptually and empirical separate topics something can be heritable and not continuous and something can be continuous and
More Less
Unlock Document


Only half of the first page are available for preview. Some parts have been intentionally blurred.

Unlock Document
You're Reading a Preview

Unlock to view full version

Unlock Document

Log In


OR

Don't have an account?

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit