ANT253 final exam notes.docx

5 Pages
Unlock Document

University of Toronto St. George
Marcel Danesi

Anthro final exam notes: Chapter 6: Language and cognition - In Boas study of American Aboriginal languages he discovered features that suggested to him that languages served people as classificatory devices for dealing with their environment and realities. - Specialized vocabularies serve classificatory functions across the world, encoding realities that seem to be critical by certain cultures. - Language and terminology evolves alongside culture and the trends that are “in”. E.g. today we have terminology for iPhones and iPods but back then we had terminology for typewriters. - Changes in language mirror changes in society and culture. - Language comes to change how we perceive the world since the words we use populate the brain and guide its everyday tasks of referring to the world (chapter looks at ways in which language and cognition are intertwined). - In 19 CE the interplay between language and thought came to be known as the Whorfian Hypotheses (WH). - WH suggests that language structures influence native speakers to attend to certain concepts as being necessary. - WH suggests that language is both a specific world making device and a flexible tool that can be used creatively to understand people from all over the world.  Classification: - Naming things that makeup human experience (e.g. cars, plants, flowers etc.) allows people to organize the world conceptually. - With out names the world would remain a flux of impressions that our senses and instincts would process for survival purposes. - Although classification systems vary across cultures people aren’t blocked from understanding them. - When a word is coined for a specific reason it’s automatically classified as something part of a category selecting it into mental awareness. (E.g. cats are part of category of animals/pets and are distinct from non-cat category and part of the greater feline category) - Cultures stop their classificatory decision-making when they no longer see differentiation as useful. - Science is the craft of classifications aka as taxonomy. - Early humans divided all things into 2 categories: useful and harmful - Modern classifications are based on microscopic structural and biochemical characteristics - Conceptual knowledge is not an innate feature of the mind. It starts in childhood and is put into social context. - How do we shift from sensory to conceptual modes of knowing? (E.g. the word blue is a color but its also used to express emotions like feeling down or surprised. This is a cultural specific process). - Factors such as intensity, inseparability, and repetition played a role in associative processes (e.g. arms are linked to body, rain is linked to rainbow)  Whorfian Hypotheses (WH) - Languages that are used habitually rather than reflectively shape perception aka relativity principle of WH. - WH claims that we come to perceive the world in a relative fashion, according to the linguistic concepts gained from childhood. - Specific language forms shape concepts (mental impressions) aka Whorfian effects - Language and perception are intertwined. (Language shapes the perceptions of reality) - Gestalt psychology (way of looking at WH) is a school of psychology that aims to discover the extent to which forms influence perception. Language conditions the way we see things. - Once classified, the world is passed on through language forms to subsequent generations who acquire knowledge of the world through those very forms. But future generations can change their views of the world at any time by inventing new words. - Whorf was Sapir’s student and so sometimes the WH is called the Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis acknowledging the shared views of the teacher and student. - Like Bas, Whorf suggested that the function of language was to allow people to classify experience according to their needs and thus it was an organizing grid by which humans come to perceive and understand the world around them. - 2 things about the Hopi language captured Whorf’s attention: (i) plurality and numeration (ii) verb tense - Hopi people don’t see time as an objective phenomenon and are less dependent on things like watches or schedules to carry out daily lives which is also mirrored in their language - People oppose to WH as they say: it implies that we are prisoners of the languages we speak. But Danesi says this is false. He says WH says that is says only that language and perception are intertwined (language we speak is a guide for daily living). - WH doesn’t claim that the linguistic guides of other cultures cant be learned.  Specialized vocabularies: - Every culture develops specialized vocabularies over time according to need - Naming family members is a classic example of how language and classification mirror social organization - Kinship mirrors social relations. They reveal how family is structured in a given culture and what relationship are considered important (e.g. Hawaii kinship system) - In all languages there exists verbal resources for referring to more specific gradations on the spectrum is the situation should require it (e.g. in English the world scarlet and vermillion make it possible to refer to types of red). - Brent Berlin and Paul Kay extensively studied the relation between color systems and perception and it became a point of reference when discussing WH because it shows that differences in color terms are only superficial matters that conceal universal principles of color perception. But some linguists question this study. - Despite gaps in the sequence the Berlin-Kay study has had profound implications on several counts. 1) Showed that the contrast between light and dark is the basic distinction made by humans globally 2) suggests lagaues go through stages in the production of the other color terms and so color vocabs are a product of human perception not traditions - Specialized vocabs bring out how language serves specific human needs and then returns to humans to guide their view of the world  Ethno semantics: - Specialized vocabs and WH falls under ethno semantics aka the study of semantic systems in terms of their culture specific implications. - One way to study ethno semantics is with the technique of opposition (seeing how concepts gain meaning by contrasting them to other concepts)(e.g. good-evil) nd - 2 way ethno semantic work is conducted is through componential analysis. This approach is useful in studying different semantic feature arrays for diff languages, which r
More Less

Related notes for ANT100Y1

Log In


Don't have an account?

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.