Ch16 Competition.docx

6 Pages
109 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Biology
Course
BIO120H1
Professor
Spencer Barrett
Semester
Fall

Description
BIO120H © Lis| Page 1011 chapter 16: COMPETITION  closely related plant species living in the same region often grow in diff. habitats or on diff. types of soil  ecological segregation resulted from competition for resources, A.G. Tansley leading to the exclusion of one species (ecological  saxatile lives on acidic, peaty soils segregation  sylvestre lives on alkaline soils of limestone hills and pastures resulted from  planted them singly and together w/ the 2 diff. soils competition)  results:  planted alone  grew and maintained itself on both soils (but bedstraws (genus most vigorous on natural soil type) research study G.  together on calcareous (limestone) soils  sylvestre overgrew saxatile, G. and shaded saxatile sylvestre  together on acidic, peaty soils  saxatile overgrew  thus, species are restricted to the most favourable soil when competing species are present, but can broadly be distributed over other soils in the absence of competition  the presence or absence of a species could be determined by compet. w/ other species  the conditions of the envmt affected the outcome of the compet.  the present ecological segregation of species might have resulted from competition in the past  ccompetition any use or defence of a resource by one indiv. that reduces the availability of that resource to other indiv.  iintraspecific competition competition b/w indiv. of the same species  iinterspecific competition competition b/w indiv. of diff. species  more crowded = stronger effects of compet.  compet. can depress the pop. of both species  superior competitors can persist at lower resource levels, thus curtailing the other pop. and replace it (it will outcompete) CONSUMERS COMPETE FOR RESOURCES  DDavid Tilman  resource: any substance or factor that is both consumed by an org. and supports increase pop. GR as its availability in the envmt increases  a resource is consumed and its amount or availability is reduced  a consumer uses a resource or its own maintenance and growth  when resource availability is reduced, biological processes are affected in such a way as to reduce consumer pop. growth  resources for sessile animals: (not only food)  space (open, available sites)  crowding increases adult mortality and reduces fecundity (limit growth of adults, and recruitment o larvae)  they “consume” open space  ex. barnacles attached to rocks  refuges and other safe sites (are also resources)  each habitat has limited # of holes, crevices, or patches  temp. is not a resource  org. don’t consume it, but can still limit the growth of pop. BIO120H © Li| Page 22011 Competition Between Closely and Distantly Related Species  Charles Darwin  compet. should be most intense b/w closely related species  “As species of the same genus have usu., though by no means invariably, some similarity in habits and constitution, and always in structure, the struggle will generally be more severe b/w species of the same genus, when they come into compet. w/ each other, than b/w species of distinct genera”  similar structure = similar function  distantly related org. also use same resources Renewable and Nonrenewable Resources  nonrenewable resources: resources that are not regenerated  ex. space (only “replenished” when consumer leaves)  renewable resources: constantly regenerated/renewed  ex. birth of prey provides continual supply of food for predators  types of renewable resources:  some renewable resources originate beyond the influence of consumers ex. sunlight  thus, consumers reduce its immediate availability but not their supply  the resource doesn’t respond to consumption  generated w/in the ecological sys.  predator-prey, herbivore-plant, parasite-host  supply of prey, plants, and hosts is constantly regenerated  by reducing pop. of resources, they reduce rate of renewal  regenerated w/in ecosystem linking indirectly to their consumers  through food chain links or abiotic processes  ex. nitrogen cycle: plants assimilate nitrate from soil  herbivores eat plants  return nitrogen to soil  broken down by microorganisms  release nitrogen as nitrate  plants use o uptake of nitrate by plants indirectly effects on its renewal by detritivores o consumption of detritus doesn’t immediately affect plant production (do affect indirectly through the rate they release N into soil) Limiting Resources  Justus von Liebeg  Justus von Liebeg  Liebig’s law of the minimum: the principle that the growth of a pop. is limited by the resource whose supply is most scarce relative to demand (the limitilimiting resource  each pop. increases until the supply of the limiting resource no longer satisfies the pop.’s need for it  law applies only to reaources having an independent influence on the consumer pop.  sometimes, more than 2 or more resources interact to determing the pop.’s GR  when two resources together enhance the growth of a consumer pop. more than the sum of both indic., the resources are synergistic  seeds in fertilized and unfertilized (control) soil W. J. H. Peace P.J. Grubb  exposed seedlings to diff. levels of light  results:  added light enhanced growth of ferti. more than controls Impatiens  thus, ability to use light depends on the availability of other parviflora (herbaceous resources research study  plant growth needs C from photosynthesis and CHO, N, P plant)  N and P were shown to interact synergistically to enhance growth BIO120H © Lis| Page 3011 FAILURE OF SPECIES TO COEXIST IN LABORATORY CULTURES LED TO THE COMPETITIVE EXCLUSION PRINCIPLE  typical experiments to determine effect of one species on pop. growth on another:  2 species grown separately  carrying capacity determined  species were then grown together (interspecific competition)  intensity of competition was the measure of the difference b/w the pop. growth of one species in the presence and absence of the other  competitive exclusion principle: the principle that 2 or more species cannot coexist competitive exclusion principle indefinitely on the same limiting resource  so how much diff. in resource requirement allow for coexistence? THE THEORY OF COMPETITION AND COEXISTENCE IS AN EXTENSION OF LOGISTIC GROWTH MODELS  (p. 334) Coexistence on Multiple Resources  when 2 species compete for 2 limiting resources needed in diff. amounts by each species, certain combinations of resource abundance allow the species to coexist  both require silicon and phosphorus (in diff. relative amounts)  PG of Cyclotella was equally limited by Si and P when ratio Si/P=6  Asterionella (need more Si) Si/P=90 David Tilman  at nutrient ratios below these levels, each of the species is Si- limited; above, P-limited (coexistence)  Cyclotella uses Si more efficiently (able to increase on lower Si 2 diatom species supplies) – same w/ Asterionella and P  predicted that they should coexist in culture b/w Si/P ratios of 6 Cyclotella and and 90 research studyella  C limited by P  A limited by Si  thus, the
More Less

Related notes for BIO120H1

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit