Ch17 Evolution of Species Interactions.docx
Ch17 Evolution of Species Interactions.docx

6 Pages
79 Views
Unlock Document

School
University of Toronto St. George
Department
Biology
Course
BIO120H1
Professor
Spencer Barrett
Semester
Fall

Description
BIO120H © Li| Page 12011 chapter 17: EVOLUTION OF SPECIES INTERACTIONS  biological factors which have shaped adaptations differ from physical factors:  BF stimulate mutual evolutionary responses in the traits of interacting pop.  ex. predators shape prey’s adaptations for escape which shape their own adaptations for pursuit and capture  but adaptations of animals have no reciprocating effect on the envmt (BF)  they foster diversity of adaptations rather than promoting similarity  org. specialize in response to BF  in response to similar stresses, species converge (evolve similar adaptations)  coevolution: the reciprocal evolution in 2 or more interacting species of adaptations selected by their interaction  adaptations in one pop. promote the evolution of adaptations in the other  ex. when a herbivore evolves a way to detoxify a noxious chemical that has evolved in a plant  hyena’s bone-crushing teeth is NOT coevolution  their prey didn’t evolve to resist being eaten by hyenas  when the evolutionary relationship b/w species is antagonistic, the species can be involved in an evolutionary stuggle to increase their own fitness  may result in an evolutionary stalemate where both antagonists continually evolve in response to each other, but the net outcome of their interaction is a steady state  when one doesn’t respond fast enough, it may become extinct  species in mutually beneficial relationship evolve adaptations that promote their interaction ADAPTATIONS IN RESPONSE TO PREDATION DEMONSTRATE SELECTION BY BIOLOGICAL AGENTS  colouration is a trait that can evolve in prey under selection from predators  changes in colouration feed back on predator adaptations: find increasingly well- camouflaged prey or to avoid prey w/ colouration that signal noxious qualities Crypsis versus Warning Colouration  crypsis: an appearance that allows in org. to blend into the background to avoid detection by others  ex. resembling sticks, leaves, bird droppings  strategy for palatable (edible) animals  warning colouration aposematismm): conspicuous patterns or colours adopted by unpalatable prey org. to advertise their noxiousness or dangerousness to potential predators  produce noxious chemicals or accumulate them from food plants  predators learn to avoid these colourations (org. tastes bitter)  some predators evolved innate aversions to black and red/yellow  not all potential prey species are noxious or unpalatable because chemical defences use NRG and org. who get toxicity from plants need mechanisms to avoid the toxic effects BIO120H © Li| Page 22011 Mimicry  Henry Bates  Batesian mimicry: a predator deterrence strategy in which a palatable species (mimic) resembles an unpalatable species (model)  Fritz Müller  Müllerian mimicry: a predator deterrence strategy in which several unpalatable species adopt a single pattern of warning colouration  predators learn to avoid these more efficiently b/c a bad experience w/ one species confers protection on all other members of the mimicry complex ANTAGONISTS EVOLVE IN RESPONSE TO EACH OTHER  Charles Mode coined the term coevolution - modeling  concerned w/ the relationship b/w crops and their fungal pathogens (esp. rusts)  developed a model of continual evolution of a pathogen and its host in response to evolutionary changes in each other  assumed pathogen virulence and host resistance was each controlled by a dominant gene (V, R) – both costly to org.  fitness dependant on genotype of the other  thus, frequencies of virulence and resistance genes should tend to oscillate over time  cycle: r (host)  V (pathogen)  R (host)  v (pathogen)  r (host) …  when host is susceptible (rr), selection favours virulent pathogens (VV, Vv) o virulent pathogens, selection favours host resistance (RR, Rr)  when host is resistant, selection favours avirulent pathogens (vv) o avirulent pathogens, selection favours susceptible hosts (rr)  Paul Ehrlich and PPeter Raven– observed patterns  noticed that closely related groups of butterflies tended to feed on closely related species of host plants  suggested evolutionary history linked butterflies to their host plants  evolution of butterflies tolerate the particular defences of their host plants  plants evolved ex. passionflower evolved to minimize herbivory by butterfly larvae  control: wasps allowed to parasitize a fly pop. that was kept at a constant #, emerging flies from pupa removed to maintain “naïve” hosts  experimental: fly pop. was kept at the same constant #, let David Pimentel et emerging flies remain in cage David Pimentel  wasp’s reproductive rate dropped from 135 to 49 progeny, al. longevity decreased from 7 to 4 days, pop. decreased (evolution of parasitoid-host  thus, flies evolved resistance to wasps (after 3 years – evolution occurred) relationships)  experiment 2 - # of flies allowed to vary housefly pupa vs.  control: flies and wasps had no previous contact wasp  wasps were efficient parasitoids – dramatic oscillations ecologists in the field occurred  experimental: flies and wasps from experimental cage from before  wasp pop. remained low, flies attained high constant pop. level BIO120H © Li| Page 32011 COEVOLUTION IN PLANT-PATHOGEN SYSTEM REVEALS GENOTYPE- GENOTYPE INTERACTIONS  responding evolution = genetic variation for traits that influence interactions  plant geneticists develop strains of crops resistant to pathogens  when new strain appears, they select new resistant strains  but new strains of pathogen continue to appear; by migration/mutation  results in continual evolutionary change in the sys. (Mode’s model)  genotype-genotype interactions: variation in the expression and fitness of genotypes genotype-genotype interactions in one species depending on the genotypes of another species w/ which it interacts  evolution of most species is driven in part by their interactions w/ their consumers, resources, competitors, and mutualists CONSUMER AND RESOURCE POPULATIONS CAN ACHIEVE AN EVOLUTIONARY STEADY STATE  when does evolution stop?  when a species interacts w/ many others simultaneously, no single virulence or resistance factor is likely to convey a unique advantage over all the others  the ability of virulent pathogens to switch to a more abundant host species (which gives a reduced host pop. a chance to recover) might lead to an equilibrium state of maintained genetic diversity  in strict coevolution, time delays occur b/c each pop. responds to only one other pop. resulting in cyclic changes in gene frequencies  but when multiple consumer an resource pop. affect one another simultaneously, time delays are less imp.  most eco. sys. evolve toward a steady state in which evolution continues  rate of adaptation evolution in a resource pop. is proportionate to rate at which it is exploited  thus, any adv. a consumer evolves over its resource pop. is only temporary  the strength of selection for new adaptations in consumers for exploiting resources decreases as resources are heavily exploited  when resource is not heavily exploited, adaptations of consumers that enable them to use that resource are selectively favoured, and their exploitation of that resource increases  as exploitation increases, resources reduced, and further increases in consumer efficiency have less selective value  high rates of consumption favour consumers that shifted their diets toward other, more abundant resource pop.  evolution favour less efficient use of a resource as a consequence of adaptations to exploit another, more abundant resource pop.  evolutionary steady state – when selection on the resource pop. for adaptations to reduce consumption balances selection on consumer pop. to increase consumption  both continually evolve to maintain balance COMPETITIVE ABILITY RESPONDS TO SELECTION  competitors exert pressure on each other  competitors may be selected to diverge as a result of the resources consumed  evolution of o
More Less

Related notes for BIO120H1

Log In


OR

Don't have an account?

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.

Submit