Study Guides (248,269)
Canada (121,449)
Geography (224)
GGR252H1 (10)

GGR final Review.docx

10 Pages
Unlock Document

Stephen Swales

Chapter 1  First law of geography: distance decay: the amount of interaction decreases with Distance relative to the source  Retail Deregulation in China o 92’ they tested trading with china by allowing 15 retailers to come into china ( 4 of them were Japanese) o 99’ Experiment expanded to all the capitals o 01’ open up all trades with the World Trade organization within 3 years. o 04’ foreign retail is now opened.  Western Retailers o Most western retailers are big box stores because they have little competition buy product and stock all over the world.  This is completely different from eastern retailers which buy most the product locally  Japanese retail in china: didn’t do too well o Formats of penetrting the chinese market didn’t work o There were financial diffiulties with the parent companies back in japan. o And the rigidity of the business planning and structure limited them.  International Retailers: movers and shapers of the world economy o Western Retailers have more power which help them penetrate the asian / chinese market o Asian Retailers: starting to adopt the supermaket style which have provided promising results. 1.3 Public and Private Sector perspective Public: subject to direct Public control, usually via a local government 1. Primary interest: size of faciliteis, relative spatial locations and extent of area served 2. Centers on the operational implications of the alternative strategies in terms of efficiency with which the service is provided. 3. Social implications are also conidered  Public Sectors serve as large ove a population with the smallest costs. Chapter 2: Spatial concepts and the value of geographical perspective Retail evolution in Canda  Small shifts in income demographic, lifestyle and competition can lead to rapid and large changes in structure of retail environment.  With decreased mobility increased retail condensation  With Increased mobility  decreased retail condensation o WW2: most retail was downtown cause not many had cars to venture out. o 60’s shopping center was recognized as a focal point of developing communities ( all shopping centers looked the same) o 70’s catalytic stage of retail: plant a mall on the outskirts and 3-5 years later there will be houses all around it. o 80’s Malls / retailers were seens as entertaining and touristy o 90’s zero shopping center growth due to Big box retailers like Walmart/ costco / bestbuy…they changed the market dramatically. The role of positioning  some groups markets needed to cluster to attract a specific set of consumers: galleries/ antiques etc.  Cluster types 1. Specialty Product areas: comparison shopping 2. Fashion and fatory outlet centers: designer ( high prices) 3. Factory Outlet/ Discount places because less glamourous malls and end of line product 4. Historic redeveloped properties/Theme malls: revitalizes older parts of city : Distillery district. 5. Ethnic Strips: point of origin for immigrants in a city, certain products dominate these areas. * In areas of low population, Market Killers ( Big Box retailers) tend to group together.  one parking lot with Walmar, Bestbuy, Michaels etc. Planned: Very controlled, planned out ( Eg. Shopping malls) Unplanned: uncontrolled, not managed ( Eg. Retail strip Retail chain: 4+ stores under the same owner ship ( most retail money from Chains) Independent Stores: Most stores are in this category ( traditional /family owned) Site: physical attribute of a location 2.1: Distance Decay  With increasing distance from a location, interaction with the location decreases  Friction of distance: the deterrent of inhibiting effect of distance on human activity is that it provides a frictional force. The farther the distance the more friction.  Disincentive nature of distance: economic cost, time , money and distance to cover go up with distance  less appealing.  Utility: the level of usefulness or attraction of a cente to customers. 2.2: Gravity Model  Spatial attraction depends on not only distance but also attraction ( size) of the center.  The larger the size the higher the attractiveness = increased gravity o Powernode Vs. Regional mall. Intervening opportunity: alternative origins and or destinations that will affect the volume or pattern of customer behaviours. This usually occurs between two related retailers. Range: point at which demand falls to 0 because of travel costs ( this is due to the distance decay effect) Diffusion: the way things spread through space and over time  Relocation diffusion: eg Immigration  Contagious Diffusion: spread due to the proximity of carriers or agents of cahnge ( spread of ideas or disease) Demand and Distance: the spatial demand Curve  The demand curve: Quantity purchased Vs. Price  Cost and Distance: As distance increases, costs go up due to added travel.  Spatial Demand curve: distance Vs. Quantitiy purchased per household. The Hotelling Model  Compettitive: each vendor pushes their location toward the line of indifference ( worst case for everyone)  Now they are literally in direct competition  Their customers have to now travel further to get any product. decreases Chapter 3 Cross shopping: this is the process of shopping at different stores for different items in different classes. So one might go shopping for retail items to later go to a different store to obtain entertainment. Comparing Power Nodes Vs. Regional malls  Power Node: Open shopping centers o Attract groups from farther away, the opposite of the distance decay model most people come from outside 10 k o Mostly 30-40 Yr olds o Asians Regional malls o Italians Power Nodes  Regional Malls: closed shopping centers o Attract groups from closer, follows the distance decay model most customers are inside 10k Conclusion: most cross shopping is done at Power Nodes ( good entertainment facilities), however Power Node customers tend to be older. Also: There is delayed Cross shopping effects at Power Nodes, this means that each trip to the node is specific for a certain thing, this is not the case for Regional malls, where we can see cross shopping happening all at once. Chapter 4: Trade Area analysis *Trade area analysis draws from Geographic analysis. Why are places where they are and where will they be in the future  Normative and behavioural approach to retail analysis o Normative: what should be certain assumptions, where the trade area boundaries are and to where they extend. o Behavioural: Costomer spotting: Identify where customers are coming from to define the trade area.  Costomer Spotting: Surveys or asking for your postal codes upon purchase will help them figure out where people are coming from.  Normative approaches: Theoretical in basis o Normative may be the only way to go sometimes because there Is no market to establish a behavioural pattern to the target customers. They have to infer or extrapolate in these cases. o Distance decay o Gravity model: larger might be better o Nature of distance: increased distance = increased costs o Location and competitions: this is essential for understanding where potential intervening opportunities may be. o Utility: how usefull can they make it to the costomer What are the main 3 Normative Techniques? 1. Thiessen Polygon Model 2. Converse Breakpoint Method 3. Huff Model. 1. Thiessen Polygon Model: the key here is Distance a. Based on the line of spatial indifference: line between two retailers of exactly the same qualities, such that either way choice is exactly the same. b. Consumers are fully informed ruly ration decision makers. c. There is uniform travel plain. i. If partial Census tracts with in Polygon: Centroid method or proportional grid method. ii. Centroid method: two largest diagnols in a census tract , where they intersect is the Centroid. If the centroid falls outside of trade areas then it is divided. iii. Proportial Grid method: Assumes that the census tracts are populated equally. 2. Converse Breakpoint method: the key is now distance and size which introduces gravity. a. Gravity is key in this model: this will shift the line of indifference depending on how much gravity each retailer generates. The larger the retailer the more gravity the more the line of indifference will shift towards the smaller retailer in order to balance the choice. distance and size b. If size doesn’t change then you have the same result as Thessien Polygon model. c. √ Dy: distance of breakpoint from Y Dxy: distance between centers X and Y Ax: attraction size of X Ay: attraction size of Y *the previous 2 made 1 key assumption: that there was a Spatial monopoly market: which means that all of the customers on one side of the line of indifference go to that respective retailer, this is hypothetical. Are these assumptions accurate? 3. The Huff Model: the key is Distance/Size and probability all key factors in reality. What is the probablility that a consumer will come here based on our utility. a. this model takes into account that there might be consumers that cross the line of indifference for certain reasons that we might not understand, maybe they just like the other area more. b. Assumptions: all stores in the area are possible destinations (
More Less

Related notes for GGR252H1

Log In


Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.