PHL275H1 Study Guide - Final Guide: Logical Biconditional
Document Summary
In his 2007 article analyzing theories of privacy, tavani claims, the control theory confuses privacy with autonomy (p. 8). Tavani"s argument is just because it is both valid and sound the premises of his argument are assumed to be correct in the context, and his claim can be accurately followed by the premises. By identifying and explaining the premises of tavani"s argument, i intend to prove the validity of his claim insofar that the control theory"s conclusion is not valid unless it replaces the word. First, i will explore the premises of tavani"s claim, which include identifying control theory"s conclusion, what privacy means, and what autonomy means, and explain how they are all sound. Next, i will demonstrate how, and why, the conclusion of control theory is not valid. Tavani"s argument by replacing the two words and demonstrating how the conclusion of control theory becomes valid post word replacement. Understanding tavani"s claim depends on recognizing the premises of his argument.
