2 Pages
Unlock Document

Jonathan Breslin

PHL382: FINAL LECTURE, COMPROMISED NEWBORNS NOVEMBER 21ST 2012 QUESTIONS: How aggressively should these severely compromised newborns be treated? When should neonatologist attempt to override a parental decision to not treat a compromised newborn? Why babies are unique... Facts: full term pregnancy, 40 weeks, making it to 30 weeks is considered full term, prior to 30 weeks babies can suffer several complications due to underdeveloped systems such as: -breathing and feeding issues (no interest in eating, haven't developed yet) -bleeding in the brain -infections/immune system deficiency ...0% survival for any pregnancy under 22 weeks 24 weeks, 50/50 survival rate (55% survival), 26 weeks (80% survival) : survival rate does not indicate condition of life, severe complications may accompany survival Case 1: Bella -born at 28 weeks, seemingly healthy, at one week develops serious infection, 2 treatment options: resuscitation and surgery : conclusion: dead intestines and MRI reveals widespread brain damage Prognosis: -will never eat orally due to intestines, will require frequent hospital admissions and will likely die in childhood, if she does, she will be severely cognitively impaired, survival in compromised state Case 2: Baby B, born at 24-5 weeks (50/50), 525 grams (3200g for average baby) -no breathing at birth, breathes at 3.5 mins and continues to improve quality of breathing options: intubate and ventilate, hope for a good outcome or palliate, death likely within 24hrs Prognosis: NICU outcome data: 50% of babies under 750 grams survive with max treatment, 50% survive with sever deficits (neurological, developmental, physical) Q's to consider: should agressive treatment be continued for Bella or initiated for Baby B? Should treatment for either be pursued aganist parental wish? Neonatal decision making in Ont: -age of consent after attaining 16, someone can act in the best interest of another if they are incapable of expressing it for themselves -parents need to allievate sufferings/provide medical treatment Best Interest: Wilkinson “the single most important factor in discussions on withdrawal of treatments in the present (or predicted absence) of severe intellectual disability” how does intellectual ability affect our decision making? Interests revisited: -to have an interest in something means you have a stake in it, gain or loss associated -subjective model of value: stake in something that matters personally. No harm after death because no subjectivity exists therefore no interest exists, new babies have no interest due lacking subjectivity therefore no moral obligation?, counter intuitive to think living beings don't stipulate a moral obligation alternative is an objective model: things can be good for ppl even if there are not subjectivity aware/not requiring awareness -Dworkin's detached value -Marquis 'future of value' Intellectual disability and interest possibilit
More Less

Related notes for PHL382H1

Log In


Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.