Study Guides (258,648)
CA (124,964)
UTSG (8,541)
POL101Y1 (199)
Quiz

Term Test 1 Essay Section Study Guide

10 Pages
237 Views

Department
Political Science
Course Code
POL101Y1
Professor
Jeffrey Kopstein

This preview shows pages 1-3. Sign up to view the full 10 pages of the document.
POL 101 Democracy, War &
Peace
November 22nd
The Geography of Chinese Power
oChina is both a land & sea power; virtual reach extends from Central Asia to main shipping
lanes of Pacific Ocean
oChina will stand @ hub of geopolitics even if the countrys path toward global power isnt
linear
oThanks to central control, regime can (e.g. enlist labour of millions) – relentlessly dynamic in
ways that democracies (due to temporizing) cant be
— concept of efficiency over democracy
oEmpires rarely come about by design; grow organically
oChina today is consolidating its land borders & beginning to turn outward
oChinas actions abroad are propelled by its need to secure energy, metals & strategic minerals
to support rising living standards
—built advantageous power relationships both in contiguous territories & in far-flung locales
rich in resources required to fuel its growth
—activities abroad has to do with a core national interest – economic survival – can be
defined as an uber-realist power
oBeijing cares little about type of regime with which it is engaged; requires stability not
[Western] virtue {different priorities}
oChance of war between China & US remote – challenge posed is primarily geographic [debt,
trade, global warming]
oChina = rising continental power; shifting balance of power by securing its economic needs
oImperial properties of Beijing ethnic nationalist tensions (complicates relationships with
adjacent states)
oChinas hunger for natural resources also means Beijing will take substantial risks to secure
them – resource acquisition is the principal goal of Chinas foreign policy everywhere
www.notesolution.com
oGeography could drive China & Russia apart (current alliance purely tactical) would be
advantageous for US
oChina has adopted a divide-&-conquer strategy – develop profitable relationships with
southern neighbours
oViewed as antagonist – as USs power in SE Asia passes prime & Chinas rises, states in
region increasingly cooperating with one another to mitigate Beijing’s divide-&-conquer
strategy
oBeijing prefer to see far more modern, authoritarian state develop in N Korea – create a
buffer between China & vibrant, middle-class democracy of S Korea – reunification of Korea
would also benefit China
oEasy to conceive of a Korean future within a Greater China & lessened US group presence in
NE Asia
oFavourable sitch. on land, free to work @ building a great navy
—already have disputes over parts of energy-rich ocean beds in East China Sea & South
China Sea, with Japan, Philippines & Vietnam over islands
oSuch disputes allow Beijing to stoke nationalism @ home (but sitch grim for naval
strategists)
oStill an insecure sea power, thinks about ocean territorily
oAlso improving mine-warfare capability, developing an offensive strategy to strike icon of US
power (aircraft carrier)
oMost important to advent of a Great China is future of Taiwan (only fusing of Taiwan with
Chinese mainland would mark real emergence of a multipolar military order in E Asia)
oBeijing is preparing to envelop Taiwan not just militarily but economically & socially too
oA more democratic China could be an even more dynamic great power than a repressive
China would be, in an economic & military sense
— increasing integration appears likely; will be pivotal for future of great-power politics in
region
— “Beijing aims to create a ‘disposition of power so favourable’ that ‘it will not actually
have to use force to secure its interests.’”
oRather than fight US outright, Chinese seek to influence US behaviour precisely so as to
avoid a confrontation
www.notesolution.com
— motives can change, better to track capabilities
— multipolarity will increasingly define power relationships in Asia
Arms race going on in Asia
oStrengthening the US air & sea presence in Oceania would be a compromise approach
between resisting a Greater China @ all cost & assenting to a future in which the Chinese
navy policed the 1st island chain
oUS-China tensions in years ahead will be exacerbated (although still more stable than
between US & Soviet Union)
oThe US (hegemon of Western Hemisphere) will try to prevent China from becoming the
hegemon of much of the Eastern Hemisphere
American Aims: Realism Still Prevails Over Community Idealism Green
Concept of anEast Asia Community”
[Leaders & senior officials] chose own national capabilities, alliances with US or global
institutions (e.g. UN) to rely on to prevent/respond to armed attacks, terrorism, pandemics,
etc.
Continuing gap between quantity & quality of Asias multilateral institutions & uncertainty
about future balance of power within the region
APEC – ensure regional economic integration would remain trans-Pacific & thus
complement prevailing security architecture of US alliances {efforts to generate an explicit
security agenda have usually met resistance}
EAS (East Asia Summit – begun competing with APEC – reminder of how significant great
power rivalry remains in Asia
ASEAN Regional Forum (ARF) – regions broadest forum for security dialogue
ASEAN – also proving less cohesive as a regional stabilizer than hoped for – ASEAN states
are splintering (Beijing can often count on proxies within to rep its interests; member states
cant count on unified voice on security challenges from outside SE Asia)
Six-Party talks – 1st high-level security forum in NE Asia – prospects are dim for meaningful
negotiations
Deep vein of realism just beneath surface idealism that characterizes most discussions of
regional community building
www.notesolution.com

Loved by over 2.2 million students

Over 90% improved by at least one letter grade.

Leah — University of Toronto

OneClass has been such a huge help in my studies at UofT especially since I am a transfer student. OneClass is the study buddy I never had before and definitely gives me the extra push to get from a B to an A!

Leah — University of Toronto
Saarim — University of Michigan

Balancing social life With academics can be difficult, that is why I'm so glad that OneClass is out there where I can find the top notes for all of my classes. Now I can be the all-star student I want to be.

Saarim — University of Michigan
Jenna — University of Wisconsin

As a college student living on a college budget, I love how easy it is to earn gift cards just by submitting my notes.

Jenna — University of Wisconsin
Anne — University of California

OneClass has allowed me to catch up with my most difficult course! #lifesaver

Anne — University of California
Description
POL 101 Democracy, War & Peace November 22 nd The Geography of Chinese Power o China is both a land & sea power; virtual reach extends from Central Asia to main shipping lanes of Pacific Ocean o China will stand @ hub of geopolitics even if the countrys path toward global power isnt linear o Thanks to central control, regime can (e.g. enlist labour of millions) relentlessly dynamic in ways that democracies (due to temporizing) cant be concept of efficiency over democracy o Empires rarely come about by design; grow organically o China today is consolidating its land borders & beginning to turn outward o Chinas actions abroad are propelled by its need to secure energy, metals & strategic minerals to support rising living standards built advantageous power relationships both in contiguous territories & in far-flung locales rich in resources required to fuel its growth activities abroad has to do with a core national interest economic survival can be defined as an uber-realist power o Beijing cares little about type of regime with which it is engaged; requires stability not [Western] virtue {different priorities} o Chance of war between China & US remote challenge posed is primarily geographic [debt, trade, global warming] o China = rising continental power; shifting balance of power by securing its economic needs o Imperial properties of Beijing ethnic nationalist tensions (complicates relationships with adjacent states) o Chinas hunger for natural resources also means Beijing will take substantial risks to secure them resource acquisition is the principal goal of Chinas foreign policy everywhere www.notesolution.com
More Less
Unlock Document


Only pages 1-3 are available for preview. Some parts have been intentionally blurred.

Unlock Document
You're Reading a Preview

Unlock to view full version

Unlock Document

Log In


OR

Don't have an account?

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit