POL 208 2nd Semester Vocabs.docx

19 Pages
75 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Political Science
Course
POL208Y1
Professor
Lilach Gilady
Semester
Winter

Description
POL 208 2 ndSemester Vocabs Lec 12-IPE Political Economy: interactions between economics and politics. Polity-Market overlapping area. Guns vs. Butter: each society has different balance of how much guns/butters to hold. Limited resources equals to limited choices. It is also a metaphor for PPF (Production Possibility Frontier). Economic Warfare: an intense, coercive disturbance of the economy of an adversary aimed at diminishing its power. It could be separated from military warfare (sanctions), or combined (strategic bombing, siege, blockade, etc). Cost of war: share of GDP used on military expenses/costs 1. Direct costs – tanks, aircrafts, bombs, personnel, damaged infrastructures 2. Indirect costs – higher oil prices, borrowing money, healthcare for veterans, etc 3. Opportunity costs – economic impact for the war vs direct war costs (ex. US war during 2002-2009  $1.6 trillion for the economic impact, $804 billion for direct war costs) Peace dividend: economic benefit of a decrease in defense spending. If “guns” harm the economy, peace must lower the demand for “guns”  hence generate more “butter”. Guns and butter are zero-sum. Economic liberalism: predicts that the welfare could be maximized through increased efficiency and growth. Means of efficiency (equilibrium and stability) is based on free market with minimal government intervention. Trade is an effective method as it achieves peace through yielding absolute gains. Main actors are individuals and firms. Economic Nationalism: Considers wealth to be the source of power, and economic competition for primacy. Imperialism, mercantilism, realism and protectionism all forms components of economic nationalism, as it favors the argument for government to intervene, protect their security and acquire more power. It sees trades as relative gains through processes of; Trade  interdependence  vulnerability  potential conflict (autarky) Strategic Trade: state must engage in trade strategically, only with non-threatening partners and a guarantee that the trade benefits herself more than the trading partners. Lec 13-International Trade Transaction costs: costs of trade (including transportation but also risk etc). Opportunity costs: amount of some other good that is lost in order to obtain unit of given good. Relative prices: the price of good in terms of other goods (the barter price). Ricardo’s comparative advantage: global welfare is maximized if everyone chooses free trade, and nation’s welfare is maximized by unilateral free trade. Trade creates “winners” and “losers” globally and domestically. Political question of free trade  “who” gets “what”, “when” and “how”? Factors of production: capital, land and labor that are required for any production. Heckscher-Ohlin Theorem: states that a country has comparative advantage in producing goods that make relatively intensive use of the country’s relatively abundant factor. (ex. US – capital intensive goods; China – labor intensive goods) Stolper-Samuelson Theorem: states that owners of relatively abundant factors of production benefit from free trade, and owners of relatively scarce factors of production benefit from protectionism.  Ex. Free trade raises wages in labor abundant countries and lowers wages in labor scarce countries.  Economical implication suggests that scarce factor is made worse off under free trade.  Political implication suggests that owners of scarce factors are likely to seek barriers to free trade.  Coalitions of winners/losers formed to fight for free trade/protection.  Generates “sectoral” politics as country experiences clash between aggregate benefits from free trade vs. private/individual benefits and losses.  Factors of production can divide labor into skilled/unskilled workers. Terms of Trade: the ratio of the price of an export commodity to the price of an import commodity. (Ex. Raw materials vs. processed goods.) Types of protectionism: tariffs, subsidies, Voluntary Export Restraints, Non Tariff Barriers, and Dumping  Tariff level is major tool to evaluate free trade (exports + imports / GDP)  Subsidies allow certain sectors of economy to receive protection from government.  VER’s is a government imposed limit on the quantity of goods that can be exported. (Ex. US threatens Japan for car export by saying that increase in exports will result in harsh protectionist measure  Japan voluntarily restricts export.)  NTB’s are non-tariff measures to facilitate domestic product sales (no other methods explained in lectures)  Dumping is driving industry of other country’s business out by flooding their market with products that are much cheaper (it is illegal). *Application* o Tariffs = source of income for the government and has very strong impact. o Trade generates interdependence that increases sensitivity and vulnerability. (Ex. EU interdependence led to countries being vulnerable due to Greek crisis) It could also lead to social strife and instability. o International politics concerns about relative gains, so countries need to engage in strategic trade. Prisoner’s dilemma on free trade: Defect-defect result most likely to occur. If countries stick with protectionism, countries start losing.  Player A – Japan, Player B – Canada. Choices: Free trade or Tariffs.   Free Trade  Tariffs  Free Trade  Both trade freely  Canada exports freely; Japanese exports are taxed  Tariffs  Japan exports  Mutual freely; Canadian exports protectionism; limited are taxed trade *Application* o Under anarchy, there is no guarantee that trade partners will follow the principles of free trade. They could exploit another by protectionist measures. How can we escape from sub-optimal conclusion from the free trade game? o Rise of free trade after the industrial revolution can be explained through reduced transaction costs through; 1. better (cheaper) transportation/communication. 2. Improved industry and banking to support trade. 3. Increased political power of capital/labor (less power for the land owners) Hegemonic Stability Theory (Krasner): Analyzes how the hegemonic power prefers free trade due to its advantageous position to small states. It consists of assumptions and hypothesis as following;  Assumptions: States prefer to avoid vulnerability, but also recognize that the protectionism is costly. o Small states – cannot afford the cost of protectionism. Only choice = open up. o Large states – can choose to opt for stability/security over free trade benefits. o Hegemon – due to large share of the world’s market, it can enjoy the benefits of trade without compromising stability.  A hegemon is not vulnerable, therefore sees no obstacle for free trade.  A hegemon could set trade rules that benefit its interests.  A hegemon could use its power to force other countries to open up.  A hegemon solves the prisoner’s dilemma by institutionalizing freer trade.  Hypothesis: The presence of a hegemon generates freer trade, and when hegemon declines free trade also declines. *Application* (Lec 14) Hegemony leads to free trade, and no hegemony gives more chances of protectionism. Neorealism takes into consideration the economic aspects as part of states’ “power” in realists’ terms, and it analyzes through narrow scope of domestic economic structure;  prisoner’s dilemma is solved by hegemon, because it will institutionalize freer trade by enforcing rules and preventing defection through using is power as a fear.  hegemon can enforce rules even in crisis situation, and prevent “beggar-thy-neighbor” policy because it has strong power over any other countries. No vulnerability.  hegemon is wiling to pay the costs of maintaining the free trade system because it is benefitting more out of it. Willing to pay for collective goods such as policing, enforcing rules, providing safety nets, etc. Pax Britannica: 1840-1870. Pax Americana: 1945 - ??? *Application and Question* Pax Britannica/Pax Americana are the evidences of hegemonic stability theory. However, how do they actually work in place? Why do hegemons rise and fall? How does the translation happen? What is the role of institutions? What happens in near future? Lec 14-Hegemonic Theory Foreign policy magazine rankings: Criteria of technology level, political openness, economic integrations, etc. *Application* Top ones are all small countries because when they are exposed to IR, they are small/weak so they have to make changes to adapt. In contrast, US sees less vulnerability as it is one of the biggest powers in the world with huge markets. The Kindleberger Spiral: States that the situation after WWII was a negative spiral of policies and events. Financial crisis  more protectionists policies  less markets  higher unemployment/less exports  decreased trade levels. *Application*  The Great Depression created deflation, and it didn't allow Laissez-faire idea to contribute on fixing the situation. More unemployment was seen, and it led to political turmoil.  Government responded naturally to protect its own country, implementing protectionist policies. This in fact made things worse as stated by Kindleberger.  Countries also experienced the rise of extremist political movements that eventually evolved to war. The Bretton Woods Conference: Took place in 1944, involving 44 countries. It created 3 institutions; 1. International Monetary Fund (IMF) 2. International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (later becomes World Bank) 3. General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT, which later becomes WTO in 1995) The Bretton Woods System and its logic:  Low tariffs, stable exchange rate, higher investment and development aid to facilitate market growth.  Although free trade is important, sustaining is hard because in order for trade to be equally beneficial for countries, governments must recognize some vulnerability. Capital controls must be limited to allow free money flow with less or no control.  Therefore, Bretton Woods saw the best way of free trade system to be by making the financial institutions strong, and giving them strong control over the movement of money. *Application*  Floating exchange rate, increased capital mobility (complied by increased risk/vulnerability) across borders led to globalization.  Although the Bretton Woods collapsed after failing on setting the US$ as a new gold standard, the institutions stayed to play important role.  Institutions are sticky, meaning that once they are created by the hegemon, they operate themselves with no big change even if the hegemon declines. Globalization: The process by which nationality and geographic location become increasingly irrelevant for economic activities. *Application* Trade and interdependence itself are not new concept, but;  the combinations of goods, capitals, and labors  reduced transaction costs  the volume of transaction and higher ratio of cross-border transaction Globalization occurs because;  It serves state interest and domestic interest from coalition of winners  Facilitated by institutions created by states  Hegemonic interests benefits rich (powerful) countries  Technological and economic logic imposed on the state (better efficiency)  Reversibility (justice and opportunities for redistribution) Foreign Direct Investment: A direct investment from foreign country/company into production or business in order to expand operations of an existing business in that country. FDI stocks have risen dramatically since 1980s-1990s, between developed countries. It is important factor to consider as the capital now has a viable exit option when disliking the local environment. Race to the Bottom: A phenomenon in which a globalized capital exits and move to a more profitable location. This is induced by taxation, labor laws, environmental regulations, etc. (Ex. Canadian workers compete with child labor in LDCs) *Application* An example of FDI could be Toyota building factories to North America to sell it to foreigners. Race to the bottom can take place domestically, as the increase in numbers of auto plants in the US made some states such as Michigan adopt legislation to limit the power of union. This led Michigan to be more competitive place to sell cars. Benefits/losses of this limitation depends on people in Michigan… Lec 15-Economic Modernization Multi-national Companies: Cooperation registered and operating in more than one country. These MNC’s influence state policy;  Government needs to consider ethical implications for both individuals/private firms.  Government fears the anti-globalization (focus on redistribution, externalities and democracy) to occur among the collection of different interest groups with varieties of concerns, which leads to loss of investments. Political trilemma: Triangle consisting of economic integration, mass politics, and nation state. Only 2 can be achieved at the same time, with trade off of 1 aspect. *Application*  Race to the Bottom – trading off mass politics. This leads to capital leaving and government being threatened  Very slow response to the public opinion and MNC’s set the rule instead of citizens.  Global Federalism – trading off nation state. We do not consider national borders anymore, and countries like China/India (high population) will set the rules.  Bretton Woods – trading off economic integration. It keeps certain industries closed through finding compromise between countries. It leads to limited economic integration and slower economic growth. Factor Price Equalization: States that when market forces are allowed to work and compete freely, they will push towards equilibrium. Samuelson developed a theorem, stating that free trade will eliminate price differences for commodities across countries, as well as the factors of production related (capital/labor). (Ex. Implementation of NAFTA led US to gradual decrease in wages of unskilled labor, but increase in Mexico) Modernization Theory: An optimist theory that predicted post-colonial growth and development, as the independence was believed to bring prosperity and growth quickly. The theory predicted following; Industrialization  urbanization  rise of middle classes  democracy and adoption of modernity  growth. This was believed to be done as new countries would follow European modernization model. However, in practice these new countries experienced stagnation, series of coups, instability and economic decline. The mismatching between theory and reality in LDCs could be blamed on economic policies, institutions, wars and natural environment. Import Substitution Industrialization (ISI): An economic policy that attempts to enable a developing country to substitute products which it imports (mostly finished goods), with locally produced substitutes. It is mercantilist approach with protectionist aspect, as it seeks to improve terms of trade and puts little regard for comparative advantage. (Ex. Latin America until 1980s) Export Led Industrialization (ELI): An economic policy that aims to speed-up the industrialization of a developing country through the export of goods in which it enjoys a comparative advantage. Export-led growth implies opening domestic markets to foreign competition in exchange for market access in other countries. It is a neo-liberal approach with leaving certain space for protectionism (such as infant industry protection). (Ex. NIC’s such as Asian tigers) *Application* Mozambique, a producer of half of the world’s cashew nuts, banned the export of raw cashew to stimulate domestic processing by 1980. Then it liberalized cashew sector early 1990s as advised by World Bank. Ban on cashew exports  domestic price of cashes  hurt farmers / helps processors. Instead of importing the processing services, Mozambique banned them so they could keep cashew-processing industry at home. This is an example of ISI, and it was highly disliked by the World Bank as the farmers were the poorest in Mozambique, and processing plants employed only small ratio of the population. The World Bank conditions assistance on deregulating the cashew market, but the processing industry eventually collapsed. An extreme policy bias against the countryside. Governments frequently tax the rural poor to subsidize urban industries. World Bank’s advise led Mozambique to engage in ELI. Raw cashew exports increased and processing declined. It created urban unemployment and political unrest… Although there was an additional farm income, large numbers of urban workers remain unemployed. Short-term gains from liberalization, yet reset in the long-term. Conclusion – Political institutions matter! Farmers in Mozambique believed that the government would persist with liberalization because of political importance of urban workers/industries. People thought government was not trustworthy after seeing no one really benefitting… Lec 16-Development J-curve Economic Reform: The curve shows that economic reforms (such as ISI ELI) are politically challenging especially when political institutions are weak and their legitimacy is low. In a place where institution is weak, policies are always reversed and the situation gets worse. *Application* Institutions can be “weak” due to;  Having no institutional infrastructure or no modern self-rule tradition. Some states formed differently from that of European states, therefore might face difficulties such as traditional authority structure, culture, and geography to become an actual “nation-state” free from state legitimacy imposed by colonial powers.  Spiral of - Instability  weak institutions  instability. It could also be due to;  Many LDCs (especially in Africa) depending their economy on natural resources. It leads to weak institution, backward politics and instability.  Government relying on natural resources lack wealth accountability through taxation. Taxation is important as it returns services for what is paid. Government needs to maintain certain level of effectiveness to collect tax, however if natural resources satisfy and enrich government enough, governments earnings will not be directly connected to the will of population whom pays tax. (Ex. Guns and butter balance could be unpleasing) Underdevelopment: Situation in which the resources are not used to their full-potential, therefore leading to slower development. The South is often underdeveloped due to their systems and characteristics such as;  Colonial legacy  Late industrialization  Unfavorable terms of trade (raw material exports always complied with importing more expensive industrial products from the North)  Dependency of few commodities and volatile price  Neo-colonialism which states that the exploitation has never left since post- independence, as the North always get cheap materials from South but never give back enough to them. North is using South as efficient means of acquiring self- interest. *Application* Movements in the past such as Bandung Conference (1955) and UNCTAD aimed for seeking joint interest and more important position in IR for the Third World. Issues of development and justice were new concepts, and many commitments took place to give poor countries more political power. Some argues that the terms of trade between the North and the South will not equalize unless intervened actively.  One solution is ISI, although criticized in Modernization theory. The North must give more access in the market for South, and maintain stable/high price for some raw materials, because North is responsible for exploiting South. Organizations can be established to set the pric
More Less

Related notes for POL208Y1

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit