Study Guides (390,000)
CA (150,000)
UTSG (10,000)
SOC (700)
SOC101Y1 (200)

SOC101Y1 Study Guide - Physical Restraint, Free Range, Social Forces

Course Code
Irving Zeitlin

This preview shows page 1. to view the full 5 pages of the document.
“Anomic Suicide”
* No living being can be happy or even exist unless his needs are sufficiently
proportioned to his means.
* if his needs require more than can be granted --> will be under continual
friction and can only function painfully.
- In the animal, at least in a normal condition, this equilibrium is established
with automatic spontaneity because the animal depends on purely material
- All the organism needs is that the supplies of substance and energy
constantly employed in the vital process should be periodically renewed by
equivalent quantities; that replacement be equivalent to use.
- When the void空虚 created by the existence in its own recourses is filled, the
animal, satisfied, asks nothing further.
- This is not the case with man, because most of his needs are not dependent
on his body or not to the same degree.
- The quantity of material supplies necessary to the physical maintenance of
human life is subject to computation, though this be less exact than in the
preceding case and a wider margin left for the free combinations of the will.
- For beyond the indispensable minimum which satisfies nature when
instinctive, a more awakened reflection suggests better conditions,
seemingly desirable ends craving fulfillment.
- Such appetites, however, admittedly sooner or later reach a limit which they
cannot pass.
- Nothing appears in man’s organic nor in his psychological constitution which
sets a limit to such tendencies.
- The functioning of individual life does not require them to cease at one point
rather than at another; the proof being that they have constantly increased
since the beginnings of history, receiving more and more complete
satisfaction, yet with no weakening of average health.
* In no society are they equally satisfied in different stages of the social
* Yet human nature is substantially the same among all men, in its essential
* It is not human nature which can assign the variable limits necessary to our
* They are thus unlimited so far as they depend on the individual alone.
* Irrespective of any external regulatory force, our capacity for feeling is in
itself an insatiable and bottomless abyss.
- But if nothing external can restrain this capacity, it can only be a source of
torment to itself.
- Unlimited desires are insatiable by definition and insatiability is rightly
considered a sign of morbidity.
- Human activity naturally aspires beyond assignable limits and sets itself
unattainable goals.
You're Reading a Preview

Unlock to view full version

Only page 1 are available for preview. Some parts have been intentionally blurred.

- To pursue a goal which is by definition unattainable is to condemn oneself to
a state of perpetual unhappiness.
- The more one has, the more one wants, since satisfactions received only
stimulate instead of filling needs.
* Shall action as such be considered agreeable?
- 1. only on condition of blindness to its uselessness.
- 2. for this pleasure to be felt and to temper and half veil遮盖 the
accompanying painful unrest, such unending motion must at least always be
easy and unhampered无阻碍的.
- Our thread of life on these conditions is pretty thin, breakable at any instant.
- To achieve any other result, the passions first must be limited.
- Only then can they be harmonized with the faculties and satisfied.
- But since individual has no way of limiting them, this must be done by some
force exterior to him.
- A regulative force must play the same role for moral needs which the
organism plays for physical needs. This means that the force can only be
- The awakening of conscience interrupted the state of equilibrium of the
animal’s dormant伏的 existence; only conscience, therefore, can furnish the
means to re-establish it.
- Physical restraint would be ineffective; hearts cannot be touched by physio-
chemical forces.
- Men would never consent to restrict their desires if they felt justified in
passing the assigned limit.
- But, for reasons given above, they cannot assign themselves this law of
- So they must receive it from an authority with they respect, to which they
yield spontaneously.
- Either directly and as a whole, or through the agency of one if its organs,
society alone can play this moderating role; for it is the only moral power
superior to the individual, the authority of which he accepts.
- It alone has power necessary to stipulate law and to set the point beyond
which the passion must not go.
- Finally, it alone can estimate the reward to be prospectively offered to every
class of human functionary, in the name of the common interest.
- The relative reward due to each, and the consequent degree of comfort
appropriate on the average to workers in each occupation. --> the different
functions are graded in public opinion and a certain coefficient of well-being
assigned to each according to its place in the hierarchy.
- i.e. a certain way of living is considered the upper limit to which a workman
may aspire in his efforts to improve his existence, and there is another limit
below which he is not willingly permitted to fall unless he has seriously
bemeaned himself.
- Likewise, the man of wealth is reproved if he lives the life of a poor man, but
also if he seeks the refinements of luxury overmuch.
- A genuine regimen exists, therefore, although not always legally formulated,
which fixes with relative precision the maximum degree of ease of living to
which each social class may legitimately aspire. However, there is nothing
You're Reading a Preview

Unlock to view full version