Study Guides (283,527)
CA (135,434)
UTSG (9,644)
SOC (713)
SOC101Y1 (218)

Study Guide 2

7 Pages
121 Views
Fall 2010

Department
Sociology
Course Code
SOC101Y1
Professor
Irving Zeitlin

This preview shows pages 1-2. Sign up to view the full 7 pages of the document.
L5 - Locke
Disputes divinity of monarchy
Defends right of peoples to revolt
Perfect human nature founded on the Golden Rule - preservation of peace & equality.
Authority vested in all to punish transgressors, proportional to crime committed. Those
who have been personally damaged have the unique right to seek reparation. He does
however concede that a civil government would be needed to ensure fair sentencing
The State of Nature is thus contrasted with royal absolutism, as all are accountable
to all
He tries to differentiate Nature and War, arguing that War is when there is no
common authority, but implicitly concedes that they may be one and the same, and that
this is why Nature has been discontinued, and humanity has developed modern society
complete with judicial authorities
Freedom in Nature is not freedom unhinged it is freedom under common laws
created by the government with the consent of all. Locke even states that one cannot
willingly place himself under the absolute or arbitrary power of another, as humans
lives are under Gods jurisdiction
Justification of private property, insofar as appropriation does not entail theft or
hoarding (Biblical)
Derides the connection between King and Father: (1) Neglects role of mother, (2)
Ignores temporary status of parents’ dominion, (3) Ignores accountability of parents to
law
Those under the authority of a Prince are in an even worse state than Nature, as
they have no right to defend themselves from the arbitrary and cruel decisions of the
Prince
Even if a leader is wise, forthright, and morally exemplary, assurances against
tyranny are needed. Legislative authority therefore must be separate from, and capable
of checking, Executive authority
The fact that primordial societies were mostly absolute monarchies is no defence of
the institution; that is actually to be expected from inexperienced societies, ignorant of
methods of checking power
Locke disputes the notion that individuals are born under government and thus have
no right to challenge it, citing the countless instances throughout history of people
rising against their current governments to either (A) replace them, or (B) break away
entirely to form new nations
Where Hobbes believed separation of powers would inevitably birth factionalism,
strife, and ultimately civil war, Locke supported separation, envisioning peaceful,
www.notesolution.com
constructive conflict between the branches of government which would strengthen
democracy in aggregate
Like Aristotle, Locke believed Rule of Law was paramount, under any type of
government. The legislative authority, appointed by the people, is thus the supreme
power. Furthermore, law must be impartial and equally applicable to all regardless of
political or social status
Under a constitutional government, it is simply unthinkable that anyone should
possess absolute, arbitrary power. A leader who attempts such an exercise of power
invites violent insurrection. This should only be carried out, however, when the actions
of the leader injure - or lead to the impending injury of - the majority of citizens, so as
to prevent never-ending uprising
L6 - Montesquieu
Montesquieu believed he was successful in this reconciling empiricism and
rationalism
The PERSIAN LETTERS enables French readers to question the idealization of
their own society
Parable of the Troglodytes: People should take responsibility for their own fate, and
make tough decisions based on their fundamental principles, rather than delegating
decision-making to a king
Imposition of laws from the outside cannot create a just and stable political society.
[Internalized]
To Monte, virtue refers to this inner obligation on the part of citizensvirtue is
acquired through moral education and expresses itself in societys customs and mores,
and obedience to them
The Deistic Philosophes interpreted religions main use as aiding human happiness.
They were therefore diametrically opposed to church-sanctioned persecution
Rome was undermined by (1) shifting loyalty of soldiers, (2) the granting of
citizenship to those lacking the same internalized values as born Romans, (3) the
corrupting influence of wealth - disparagement of manual labour and trade and
delegation of work to slaves; (4) Hedonistic Epicureanism, damaging military discipline.
Pomp came to overcome Frugality
Monte here outlines natural laws, referring to scientifically necessary relations
that influence all interactions. He posits that intellectual laws are fundamentally
different from natural ones, however, as they are much more easily violable. Destructive
passions necessitate civil laws
www.notesolution.com

Loved by over 2.2 million students

Over 90% improved by at least one letter grade.

Leah — University of Toronto

OneClass has been such a huge help in my studies at UofT especially since I am a transfer student. OneClass is the study buddy I never had before and definitely gives me the extra push to get from a B to an A!

Leah — University of Toronto
Saarim — University of Michigan

Balancing social life With academics can be difficult, that is why I'm so glad that OneClass is out there where I can find the top notes for all of my classes. Now I can be the all-star student I want to be.

Saarim — University of Michigan
Jenna — University of Wisconsin

As a college student living on a college budget, I love how easy it is to earn gift cards just by submitting my notes.

Jenna — University of Wisconsin
Anne — University of California

OneClass has allowed me to catch up with my most difficult course! #lifesaver

Anne — University of California
Description
L5 - Locke Disputes divinity of monarchy Defends right of peoples to revolt Perfect human nature founded on the Golden Rule - preservation of peace & equality. Authority vested in all to punish transgressors, proportional to crime committed. Those who have been personally damaged have the unique right to seek reparation. He does however concede that a civil government would be needed to ensure fair sentencing The State of Nature is thus contrasted with royal absolutism, as all are accountable to all He tries to differentiate Nature and War, arguing that War is when there is no common authority, but implicitly concedes that they may be one and the same, and that this is why Nature has been discontinued, and humanity has developed modern society complete with judicial authorities Freedom in Nature is not freedom unhinged it is freedom under common laws created by the government with the consent of all. Locke even states that one cannot willingly place himself under the absolute or arbitrary power of another, as humans lives are under Gods jurisdiction Justification of private property, insofar as appropriation does not entail theft or hoarding (Biblical) Derides the connection between King and Father: (1) Neglects role of mother, (2) Ignores temporary status of parents dominion, (3) Ignores accountability of parents to law Those under the authority of a Prince are in an even worse state than Nature, as they have no right to defend themselves from the arbitrary and cruel decisions of the Prince Even if a leader is wise, forthright, and morally exemplary, assurances against tyranny are needed. Legislative authority therefore must be separate from, and capable of checking, Executive authority The fact that primordial societies were mostly absolute monarchies is no defence of the institution; that is actually to be expected from inexperienced societies, ignorant of methods of checking power Locke disputes the notion that individuals are born under government and thus have no right to challenge it, citing the countless instances throughout history of people rising against their current governments to either (A) replace them, or (B) break away entirely to form new nations Where Hobbes believed separation of powers would inevitably birth factionalism, strife, and ultimately civil war, Locke supported separation, envisioning peaceful, www.notesolution.com
More Less
Unlock Document

Only pages 1-2 are available for preview. Some parts have been intentionally blurred.

Unlock Document
You're Reading a Preview

Unlock to view full version

Unlock Document

You've reached the limit of 4 previews this month

Create an account for unlimited previews.

Already have an account?

Log In


OR

Don't have an account?

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit