4 Pages
Unlock Document

Western University
Health Sciences
Health Sciences 2610F/G
Aleksandra Zecevic

Enhancement – Listening (1) Modes vs. types Types - any human capacity that is amenable to enhancement Modes – things like germ-line enhancement, somatic gene therapy, etc. Sometimes its hard to distinguish between enhancement and treatment, because enhancement usually starts as treatment. Economic development is a type of non-biomedical cognitive enhancement. Things like literacy which does in fact change the brain, the development of agriculture has enhanced food security etc. Still enhances us indirectly. There are no radically new moral issues when it comes to historical enhancement. Notion of human nature is hard to define and treat as the standard because we don’t really know the fine lines of human therapy. Enhancements originally only affordable by the rich could easily diffuse to the rest of the population, the way cell phones and generic drugs do. Ambiguity in enhancement – something can be an enhancement, but still may not be an improvement in even the individual. Enhancement doesn’t necessarily mean an increase in net gain. It may maximize our abilities but not improve our life or make us happy. In the particular areas of where enhancements are emerging, we must develop specific and relevant guidelines. Network effect – the benefit of my having an enhancement may increase as others gain an advantage. Enhancement doesn’t have to be a zero-sum game. Ex. the value of my being literate is enhanced by others being literate. Enhancement could possibly boost the intelligence of the disadvantaged and reduce inequalities, however it could also exacerbate inequalities. Genetic Enhancement in Sports – Michael Sandel Criticizes the non-medical use of genetic technology for enhancement. Cure and non- medical enhancement requires a normative ideal of health. (1) Steroids have long-term medical risks. (2) Fairness, but the use of it by some, puts others at a disadvantage. Genetic enhancement in sports, moves us away from the cultivation and display of natural gifts. It would create an amazing spectacle, but we wouldn’t be watching a sport. It wouldn’t be athletic achievement. It would make us think of ourselves as wholly self- sufficient which isn’t necessarily a good thing. Health Allocation – John Broome How do you evaluate and weigh lives? Is it better to live longer lives or shorter more flourishing ones? Evaluating good things that have already happened in life versus the good things that could still happen in life. However there is no certainty in future goodness. Decision theory – evaluate the possible things that might happen, and attach a probability to it which gives us the expected value, the average goodness if we do one thing versus another. QALYS – calculation of life quality. Often we disadvantage people that are already disadvantaged. It means the unequal distribution of good. Fairness requires that we receive the good that reflects our need. You can’t always provide resources fairly especially if they’re limited, but you can always allow fair and equal access to it. Use of Animals as Samples of Research and Food Jeff McMahon – Vegetarianism - the good experiences that animals have matters morally. The gains that people derive from eating animals don’t outweigh the harm that animals must experience (all the good that the animal can have from living a longer life). Rearing a sentient being into existence gives you moral responsibility for that sentient being’s wellbeing. Bring animals into existence doesn’t mean you can kill it. There is a hierarchy of value and neurological activity. The produce of animals itself has no moral status, it is the treatment of the animals who create the produce that matters. It is important to show respect for the dead human bodies. Organ transplantation is a type of the consumption of dead human bodies. We would become cannibals if there was necessary medical benefit from eating human flesh. The argument is about suffering. Animal suffering matters. Physical suffering between higher animals and human beings may be very similar, although humans experience higher psychological status. Unlike other victimized populations, animals can’t protest. By reinforcing each other’s behaviour, we continue to perpetuate eating meat even if we are aware it may be wrong. Peter Singer- Animal Suffering, author of Animal Liberation - most human beings are persons but we were not born as persons, and some are no longer persons. Strict utilitarian – maximizing the interests of all sentient beings. The killing of animals is not the wrongness, but the fact that animals can suffer. When we’re producing them for food, we are putting them through suffering for their entire lives - factory farming – all so we can produce food a little more cheaply. Eating game is more morally permissible than factory farming or free range meat because being a good shot is short and sweet, and limits suffering. Speciesism – the point is that we give less weight to the interests of
More Less

Related notes for Health Sciences 2610F/G

Log In


Don't have an account?

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.