Study Guides (238,076)
Canada (114,909)
Philosophy (363)

Criminal Justice Act

2 Pages
Unlock Document

Western University
Philosophy 2080
James Hildebrand

CRIMINAL MIND CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT 1967 y A court or jury in determining whether a person has committed an offence a Shall not be bound in law to infer that he intended or foresaw a result of his action by reason only of its being a natural and probably consequence of those actions b Shall decide whether he did intend or foresee that result by reference to all the evidence drawing such inferences from the evidence as appear proper in the circumstances PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS v MORGAN HAILSHAM OF ST MARYLEBONE y The four appellants were all convicted various offences connected with alleged rapesy Whom the first appellant is the husband y The 234 appellants were convicted each of a principal offences alleged to have been committed by each of the other two y Accepting and applying the ancient common law doctrine that a husband cannot be guilty of raping his own wife y Charged with an convicted of aiding and abetting te rapes alleged to have been committed by the other three y Whether in rape the defendant can properly be convicted
More Less

Related notes for Philosophy 2080

Log In


Don't have an account?

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.