Study Guides (256,439)
CA (124,651)
Western (13,303)
Philosophy (379)
2080 (144)

POL- Oct8.doc

2 Pages
68 Views

Department
Philosophy
Course Code
Philosophy 2080
Professor
Jeannie Gillmore

This preview shows half of the first page. Sign up to view the full 2 pages of the document.
How do you pick a number for non-pecuniary damages?
-Judges pick an arbitrary number that they feel is appropriate
-Damages are awarded based on present circumstances (i.e. not based on possible cures,
possible job loss, etc)
-Numbers a lot higher in the United States than in Canada
-Money based on principles of law as presently established
“No fault insurance”: a no-fault insurer gives you financial support while waiting for trial
Purpose of damages in negligence/tort law: to put the plaintiff in a situation similar to what they were
before the incident; to compensate
Case Study: Andrews vs. Grand and Toy
-21 year old man in accident where he suffered injuries crippling him for life; court deemed
him almost entirely disabled, still has all mental function
-Andrews won a significant award at trial, but defendant appealed to the court on the basis that
the plaintiff could receive hospital care at a significantly lower cost than home care.
-Appellant court agreed that home care would be much better for the plaintiff, but since it is
the choice of the respondent to live in his own home it is considered a “luxury”, not a
necessity.
-Damages are calculated based on established loss. Can not base damages based on what he
could do with it (i.e. trip to Vegas?)
-Insurance proceeds are available, so financial sources are not an issue
-“Is it reasonable to be compensated to be put in a position that the plaintiff would enjoy?”
(i.e. home care)
-On the appeal, Andrew’s award was reduced from $4000 a month to $1000.
Contingencies: things that may or may not happen that might save the defendant money (i.e. plaintiff
might die early), and so reduce the damages by a percentage; arbitrary
-Original damages were accepted, and the plaintiff was allowed the $4000 to live in his home,
but contingencies were still allowed
Non Pecuniary Damages
-Conceptual approach: “a thumb is worth $500…” etc
-Personal approach: taking a person’s situation into account “a trumpet player would suffer
more from a lost thumb, so they get more money…”
-Money is not meant to replace happiness, but is meant to provide solace for the person
suffering the loss
-Cap in Canada today set around $200-220 thousand for pain and suffering
Duty to Rescue
-Do you have an obligation to help someone in danger? …No.
-The law imposes no legal obligation on you to rescue someone in danger, unless you have a
relationship with someone where you are responsible for them
-You could put yourself in peril when you step in to help
-If a rescue is commenced, you are not obliged to continue that rescue unless there is a special
relationship between you and that person, where the law requires you to do something.
-If the would-be rescuer is negligent when they rescue, and makes the victim’s situation worse
than it would have been without help, then you could be liable
-Liability to a would-be rescuer: if you put yourself in a situation of peril negligently, you are
liable for any injury your rescuer sustains in trying to help you, unless your rescuer shows a
wonton reckless disregard for safety
Good Samaritan Act: If you step in to help someone in peril, you are protected so that you can not be
sued unless your conduct is grossly negligible
Case Study: Matthews vs. Maclauren
-Matthews fell off boat, Hoarsley jumps in to save him, but dies because the water is so cold,
he has a heart attack. Mrs. Jones also jumps in to help, but survives.
-Maclauren is the owner of the boat, reverses the boat to try to help them. He has a duty of
care to rescue anyone that is in peril as a result of his boat. He is found negligent because he
backed up the boat causing Hoarsley to jump in as a result of the situation.
-Hoarsley is a forseeable plaintiff because Maclauren was negligent in his method of rescue.

Loved by over 2.2 million students

Over 90% improved by at least one letter grade.

Leah — University of Toronto

OneClass has been such a huge help in my studies at UofT especially since I am a transfer student. OneClass is the study buddy I never had before and definitely gives me the extra push to get from a B to an A!

Leah — University of Toronto
Saarim — University of Michigan

Balancing social life With academics can be difficult, that is why I'm so glad that OneClass is out there where I can find the top notes for all of my classes. Now I can be the all-star student I want to be.

Saarim — University of Michigan
Jenna — University of Wisconsin

As a college student living on a college budget, I love how easy it is to earn gift cards just by submitting my notes.

Jenna — University of Wisconsin
Anne — University of California

OneClass has allowed me to catch up with my most difficult course! #lifesaver

Anne — University of California
Description
How do you pick a number for non-pecuniary damages? -Judges pick an arbitrary number that they feel is appropriate -Damages are awarded based on present circumstances (i.e. not based on possible cures, possible job loss, etc) -Numbers a lot higher in the United States than in Canada -Money based on principles of law as presently established “No fault insurance”: a no-fault insurer gives you financial support while waiting for trial Purpose of damages in negligence/tort law: to put the plaintiff in a situation similar to what they were before the incident; to compensate Case Study: Andrews vs. Grand and Toy -21 year old man in accident where he suffered injuries crippling him for life; court deemed him almost entirely disabled, still has all mental function -Andrews won a significant award at trial, but defendant appealed to the court on the basis that the plaintiff could receive hospital care at a significantly lower cost than home care. -Appellant court agreed that home care would be much better for the plaintiff, but since it is the choice of the respondent to live in his own home it is considered a “luxury”, not a necessity. -Damages are calculated based on established loss. Can not base damages based on what he could do with it (i.e. trip to Vegas?) -Insurance proceeds are available, so financial sources are not an issue -“Is it reasonable to be compensated to be put in a position that the plaintiff would enjoy?” (i.e. home care) -On the appeal, Andrew’s award was reduced from $4000 a month to $1000. Contingencies: things that may or may not happen that might save the defendant money (i.e. plaintiff might die early), and so reduce the damages by a percentage; arbitrary -Original damages were accepted, and the plaintiff was allowed the $4000 to live in his home, but contingencies were still allowed Non Pecuniary Damages -Conceptual approach: “a thumb is worth $500…” etc -Personal approach: taking a person’s situation into account “a trumpet player would suffer more from a lost thumb, so they get more money…” -Money is not meant to replace happiness, but is meant to provide solace for the person suffering the loss -Cap in Canada
More Less
Unlock Document


Only half of the first page are available for preview. Some parts have been intentionally blurred.

Unlock Document
You're Reading a Preview

Unlock to view full version

Unlock Document

Log In


OR

Don't have an account?

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit