Philosophy 2400F/G Final: Philosophy 2400/ Phil. Mind Final Exam Review Notes

363 views24 pages

Document Summary

Starts off by saying some people have said identity statements, specifically scientific discoveries, have been described as contingent. Kripke thinks all of these statements are necessary if they are true, w/ notion of rigid and non-rigid designators. Rigid designator: same object designated by term in all possible worlds. Ex. the square root of 25, in all possible worlds, =5; referent will always be the same. Non-rigid designator: different possible objects could be designated by term in all possible worlds. The inventor of bifocals could be a different person in a different world. Philosophers want to keep these contingency claims for our theoretical understanding of mind-body problem. Problem for identity theorists: claims are now necessary so they cannot reply to the objection (that we can imagine pain existing w/out a state of body, even no mind) #3 explain the role of after-images for philosophers like place and smart.