Study Guides (248,619)
Canada (121,639)
Philosophy (375)
Ryan Robb (17)

Week 9 - Susan Hurley

7 Pages
60 Views

Department
Philosophy
Course Code
Philosophy 2730F/G
Professor
Ryan Robb

This preview shows pages 1 and half of page 2. Sign up to view the full 7 pages of the document.
Description
Hurley 11/20/2012 3:06:00 PM Lecture 9 How Far Should the Right to Free Expression Extend?  Good way to end an essay – address the limits of the argument, not everything was covered but this is what was pointed out  Italicize case titles in essays Review  Last class, our two articles both offered arguments that sought to defend an account of what the media should be doing in respect of some specific issue.  Our interest in those articles was motivated by our ongoing discussion of the principles by which the actions of the media should be assessed… in each case the authors were trying to discuss how those principles ought to be applied.  Levy argued that, when it comes to the collection of information to identify corruption, the media ought to rely on proactive techniques to fulfill their role as the fourth branch of government.  Held argued that the media ought to represent the positions of those who experience and create political violence in greater detail if they are to fulfill their moral obligations.  She argued, further, that the media will likely fail to do so because of the influence of the profit motive.  This week, we shift our focus to one particular principle that has been implicit in all our discussions of the neutral, critical, and independent media most assume is necessary in a democratic society… the right to freedom of expression.  If the media is to be neutral, critical, and independent, the members of the media need to be assured that they will not be punished for expressing themselves.  The institutional mechanism in democratic societies normally relied upon to assure the media they will not be subject to reprisals for spreading accurate information comes in the form of a constitutional right of free expression.  To say that all the citizens of some country have a constitutional right to the freedom of expression is to say that the government of that country has a duty to refrain from introducing legislation that interferes with that right.  When initially conceived, the right to free speech was intended to protect journalists, not entertainment.  As the primary source of entertainment, our first article tries to provide reasons for thinking that entertainment should not enjoy the same degree of constitutional protection as journalism.  The two legal decisions we consider are intended to explore the idea of the sorts of limits that can be imposed on freedom of expression by contrasting the Canadian approach to hate speech with the US approach to hate speech. Hurley – Violent Entertainment and Free Speech  The Point: o General – Political philosophers in the „Liberal‟ tradition, who rely so heavily on the ideas of rationality and autonomy need to be willing to rethink their reliance on these aspects of human cognition, as relevant empirical data is accumulated in the cognitive and social sciences. o Specific – Recent studies in cognitive science on imitation, and in social science on the effects of violent entertainment, when considered in combination, support the following claims: o Violent Entertainment causes violent behaviour, which will lead to third party harm. To the degree that third party harm is caused, governments would be justified in restricting violent entertainment. o This is a controversial thesis inasmuch as „free speech‟ is a Liberal principle traditionally accorded special status (i.e., imposing limits on speech is a big deal).  I. Imitation o Imitation is not a merely childish reaction, but is instead a cognitive mechanism unique to humans, that appears to contribute to language formation, acculturation, and the ability to recognize other minds. o „Full-fledged imitation‟ – novel action learned by observation, which includes adoption of both goals and means of achieving goals. o „Emulation‟ – adoption of goals from observation, but using alternate means. o „Response-priming‟ – copied body movements without any goal or means, e.g., contagious yawning or laughing. o „Stimulus-enhancement‟ – action of another draws attention to stimulus that triggers an innate or learned response. o Full-fledged imitation is rare outside the human species. Babies imitate, even when the means to the goal adopted are not efficient. Chimps by comparison, will emulate when the means of achieving the goal are inefficient. o Why are human babies so committed to imitation? Perception is imitative unless inhibited, and babies don‟t have the capacity to inhibit their imitative responses. o Adults with damage to the inhibiting centers of the brain will imitate observed actions in a similar manner… they will imitate when told not to, and will try to justify their imitation. o “Ideomotor Theory: Every representation of movement awakes in some degree the movement that it represents” (p. 170). o The Chameleon Effect (from social psychology): “[T]he mere perception of another‟s behaviour automatically increases, in ways subjects are not aware of, the likelihood of engaging in that behaviour oneself”(p. 171). o The lesson from Ideomotor theory is that thinking about or perceiving an action will make you more likely to perform the action because of the link between perception and action. o The Chameleon effect is the „default tendency‟ of humans to imitate, meaning that this tendency is something that must be, and usually is, overridden in normal adult humans. o The neurological basis for the human tendency to imitate is „Mirror Neurons‟, i.e., neurons that fire for both perception and action. o Why would our species have developed this tendency? Maybe because imitation preserves evolutionary successes, and ensures they are repeated. Maybe because they provide for social successes as well. o The big lesson Hurley wants to take from the empirical study of imitation is that humans have a strong tendency to imitate that is not subject to rational deliberation… a tendency that is therefore difficult to entirely overcome or control.  II. Violence and Imitation o „Violence‟ is defined by Hurley as “the intentional infliction o
More Less
Unlock Document

Only pages 1 and half of page 2 are available for preview. Some parts have been intentionally blurred.

Unlock Document
You're Reading a Preview

Unlock to view full version

Unlock Document

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit