Study Guides (248,633)
Canada (121,642)
notapp (13)


2 Pages

Political Science
Course Code
Political Science 2102A/B

This preview shows 80% of the first page. Sign up to view the full 2 pages of the document.
Friedman: He argued for, among other things, a volunteer army, freely floating exchange rates, abolition of licensing of doctors, a negative income tax, and education vouchers role of economic capitalism in a liberal society Advocate of free market He argued for, among other things, a volunteer army, freely floating exchange rates, abolition of licensing of doctors, a negative income tax, and education vouchers He argues for economic freedom as a precondition for political freedom American usage of liberal has been corrupted since the Great Depression Introduction - The introduction lays out the principles of Friedman's archetypal liberal, a man who supports limited and dispersed governmental power. Friedman opts for the continental European, rather than American, definition of the term. i. The Relation between Economic Freedom and Political Freedom - In this chapter, Friedman promotes economic freedom as both a necessary freedom and also as a vital means for political freedom. He argues that, with the means for production under the auspices of the government, it is nearly impossible for real dissent and exchange of ideas to exist. Additionally, economic freedom is important, since any "bi-laterally voluntary and informed" transaction must benefit both parties to the transaction. ii. The Role of Government in a Free Society - According to the author, the government of a liberal society should enforce law and order and property rights, as well as take action on certain technical monopolies and diminish negative "neighborhood effects." The government should also have control over money, as has long been recognized in the constitution and society. Martinez: This book explains how the 2008 financial meltdown came about and how to revitalize global and domestic economies. It shows how capitalist economies developed and why the state matters in their functioning. Free market purists claim that the state is an inefficient institution that does little for society beyond providing stability and protection. The activities related to distributing resources and economic growth, they say, are better left to the 'invisible hand' of the marketplace. These notions now seem tragically misguided in the wake of the 2008 market collapse and bailout. Mark Martinez describes how the flawed myth of the 'invisible hand' distorted our understanding of how modern capitalist markets developed and actually work. Martinez draws from history to illustrate that political processes and the state are not only instrumental in making capitalist markets work but that there would be no capitalist markets or wealth creation without state intervention. He brings his story up to the present day to show how the seeds of an unprecedented government intervention in the financial markets were sown in past actions. "The Myth of the Free Market" is a fascinating and accessible introduction to comparative economic systems as well as an incisive refutation of the standard mantras of neoclassical free market economic theory. George Soros: In ‘The Capitalist Threat’, George Soros argues against laissez-faire capitalism, asserting that it presents the greatest danger to open and democratic societies. While many socialists would readily embrace this idea, one would be hard-pressed to describe Soros as a socialist. Arguably the most successful speculator of all time, Soros has profited immensely from free markets, in 1992 he made a billion dollars in a single day by betting against the British pound and till recently, his flagship Quantum Funds was the world’s largest hedge fund. However, despite his immense success under the capitalist system, Soros now fears that free markets and the values associated with them are threatening us all. Laissez-faire capitalism, he believes, has become the dominant belief in our society today and its promotion of the idea that the common good can be best served through the uninhibited pursuit of self-interest has bred excessive individualism. In addition, he rejects the view that laissez-faire capitalism leads to the optimal allocation of resources, asserting that it is ‘just as much a perversion of supposedly scientific verities as Marxism-Leninism is’ because it depends on the economic theory that free and competitive markets are allocatively efficient. Central to this argument is his concept of ‘reflexivity’, which is a feedback mechanism between one’s perceptions of events and the effect that these perception have on the events themselves. The problem with the theory of perfect competition as Soros points out is that it requires
More Less
Unlock Document

Only 80% of the first page are available for preview. Some parts have been intentionally blurred.

Unlock Document
You're Reading a Preview

Unlock to view full version

Unlock Document

Log In


Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.