Study Guides (248,402)
Canada (121,510)
Psychology (1,711)

Psych Chpt 13 Review.pdf

5 Pages
113 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Psychology
Course
Psychology 1000
Professor
Richard Shugar
Semester
Fall

Description
Chapter 13▯ Behaviour in a Social Context▯ ▯ Social Thinking and Perception▯ ▯ Attribution: Perceived the Causes of Behaviour▯ - attributions: judgements about the cause of our own and other people’s behaviour and outcomes.▯ - influence our subsequence behaviour and emotions.▯ - personal (internal) attributions: infer that people’s behaviour is caused by their characteristics.▯ - situational (external) attributions: infer that aspects of the situation cause a behaviour.▯ - Harold Kelley said that there are three types of information determine the attribution we make:”▯ - consistency, distinctiveness, and consensus.▯ - fundamental attribution error: we underestimate the impact of the situational and overestimate the role of personal factors when explaining other people’s behaviour.▯ - applies to how we perceive other people’s behaviour rather than our own.▯ - when it comes to our own behaviour we tend to protect our self esteem by displaying self serving bias.▯ - def’n: making relatively more personal attributions for successes and more situational attributions for failures.▯ - strength of self serving bias depends on various factors, ranging from one’s psychological state to cultural norms.▯ - cultural backgrounds.▯ - also seem to affect the way we go about making attributions.▯ - same underlying psychological principle: a link between holistic thinking and beliefs about causality.▯ - attributions play a key role in impression formation.▯ - primacy effect: refers to our tendency to attach more importance to the initial information that we learn about a person.▯ - primacy decreases and recency effect may occur.▯ - capacity for forming snap judgments based on small amounts of initial information.▯ - recency effect: giving greater weight to the most recent information.▯ - mental sets.▯ - the readiness to perceive the world in a particular way.▯ - powerfully shapes how we interpret a stimulus.▯ - also know as schemas.▯ - stereotypes: a generalized belief about a group or category of people.▯ - a powerful type of schema.▯ - self fulfilling prophecy: occurs usually without conscious awareness, when people’s erroneous expectations lead them to act toward others in a way that brings about the expected behaviours, thereby confirming the original impression.▯ ▯ Attitudes and Attitude Change.▯ - attitude: a positive or negative evaluative reaction toward a stimulus, such as a person, action, object, or concept.▯ - shape the course of world events.▯ - our attitudes are supported by an extensive personal belief and value system.▯ - attitudes predict our behaviour.▯ - three factors to help explain why the attitude behaviour relationship is strong.▯ - first: attitudes influence behaviour more strongly when counteracting situational factors are weak.▯ - theory of planned behaviour: our intention to engage in a behaviour is strongest when we have a positive attitude toward the behaviour.▯ - second: attitudes have a greater influence on behaviour when we are aware of them and when they are strongly held.▯ - third: general attitudes are better at predicting general classes of behaviour, and specific attitudes are better at predicting specific behaviours.▯ - theory of cognitive dissonance: people strive for consistency in their cognitions.▯ - cognitive dissonance: uncomfortable state of tension. ▯ - behaviour that is inconsistent with our attitude is called counter-attitudinal behaviour.▯ - dissonance does not always lead to attitude change.▯ - self perception theory: we make inferences about our own attitudes by observing how we behave.▯ - both predict that counter-attitudinal behaviour will produce attitude change.▯ Persuasion.▯ - communicator credibility: how believable the communicator is.▯ - often key to effective persuasion.▯ - two major components: expertise and trustworthiness.▯ - more effective to present only your side of the issue or to also present the opposition’s arguments and then refute them.▯ - central route to persuasion: occurs when people think carefully about the message and are influenced because they find the arguments compelling.▯ - peripheral route to persuasion: occurs when people do not scrutinized the message but are influenced mostly by other factors, such as speaker’s attractiveness or a message’s emotional appeal.▯ ▯ Social Influence▯ Mere presents of Others.▯ - the presents of others energizes performance.▯ - studies have found two things: ▯ - mere presents of co-actors or a passive, silence audience enhanced performance.▯ - the presents of co-actors worsened performance.▯ - the mere physical presents of another person increases our arousal.▯ - arousal increases, we become more likely to perform whatever behaviour happens to be our dominant response.▯ - called social facilitations.▯ - may be the most basic of all social influence processes, and it has an important practical implications: when learning complex tasks, minimize the presence of other people.▯ ▯ Social Norms: The Rules of the Game.▯ - social norms: shared expectations about how people should think, feel, and behave, and they are the cement that binds social systems together.▯ - some are formal laws and some are unspoken.▯ - social role: consists of a set of norms that characterizes how people in a given social position ought to behave.▯ - role conflict: occurs when someone has more then one role to play in a society.▯ - example: a woman may be a teacher, mother, wife, sister, etc.▯ - norms and roles can influence behaviour so strongly that they compel a person to act uncharacteristically. ▯ - norms regulate even such subtle aspects of social behaviour as the amount for personal space that we prefer when interacting with people.▯ - norms vary across cultures.▯ - conclusion: whether at a cultural level or in a small random group, humans place together seem to develop common standards for behaviour and judgements. ▯ ▯ Conformity and Obedience.▯ - informational social influence: when we follow the options or behaviours of others because we believe they have accurate knowledge and what they are doing is “right”.▯ - we also may conform to obtain rewards that come from being accepted by other people, while at the same time avoiding their rejection.▯ - situational factors that influence people’s degree of conformity are:▯ - group size.▯ - conformity of others.▯ - rewards of conformity.▯ - face to face confrontation or not.▯ - factors that influence destructive obedience.▯ - remoteness of the victim.▯ - closeness and legitimacy of the authority figure.▯ - cog in a wheel.▯ - personal characteristics.▯ ▯ ▯ ▯ ▯ ▯ Detecting and Resisting Compliance Techniques.▯ - norm of reciprocity: involves the expectations that when others treat us well, we should respond in kind.▯ - therefore to get you to imply with a request, someone can do something nice for you now and in hopes that you feel pressure to reciprocate later when they present you with a request.▯ - door in the face technique: a persuader makes a large request, expecting you to reject it and presents you with a smaller request.▯ - the persuader “compromises” by making the second, smaller request, so we feel pressure to reciprocate by complying.▯ - foot in the door technique: a persuader get you to comply with a small request first, and later presents a larger request.▯ - lowballing: a persuader gets you to commit to some action and then before you actually perform the behaviour, he/ she increased the “cost” of that same behaviour.▯ - lowballing and foot in the door techniques involve moving from a smaller request to a larger, more costly one.▯ - by recognizing when compliance techniques are being used to manipulate your behaviour, you are in a better position to resist them.▯ - the goal is not to automatically reject every social influence attempt but to avoid feeling coerced into doing something you don’t want to do.▯ ▯ Crowd Behaviour and Deindividuation.▯ - anonymity that exists in mobs leads to a loss of personal identity and a weakening of restraints that prompt people to engage in behaviours they would not perform as individuals.▯ - condition referred as deindividualization. ▯ - def’n: a loss of individuality that leads to disinhibited behaviour.▯ - anonymity to outsiders is key.▯ - conditions make people less identifiable to people outside the group reduce feelings of accountability and, slightly but consistently, increase the risk of antisocial actions.▯ ▯ Social Loafing.▯ - the tendency for people to expend less individual effort when working in a group.▯ - social loafing involves collective performance.▯ - can also occur in cognitive tasks.▯ - collective effort model: on a collective task, people will put forth effort only to the extent that they expect their effort to c
More Less

Related notes for Psychology 1000

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit