Study Guides (248,398)
Canada (121,510)
Business (1,240)
BU231 (118)
Final

Business Law Study Notes.pdf

105 Pages
396 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Business
Course
BU231
Professor
Shelley Mc Gill
Semester
Fall

Description
• Duty of Care (Extended) o Principle criterion of duty of care is that the alleged wrongdoer should have foreseen that his actions might do harm o One cannot be expected to anticipate all possible consequences but, “would a normally intelligent and alert person have foreseen that this conduct would have likely caused harm?”  Hunt vs. Sutton • Christmas party with open bar ends with a paraplegic after a drunken employee refused a ride home • Woman drank a lot at the party, then went to the hotel bar after that • Hunt charged her employer with negligence because they knew she was drunk but didn’t do enough to stop her o Plaintiff must go further and establish a duty of care  Duty will arise only where the defendant could reasonably have foreseen a risk of harm to that plaintiff or someone in the plaintiff’s position  Eg. Courier company was not held liable for delivering an article of mail too late for a private sale to be completed as it could not reasonably foresee the delay would cause a loss to some third party outside its relation with the client (not allowed to read the mail!) o Courts have sometimes held that duty of care is owed to persons other than the individual who is directly injured  Eg. Court held driver liable when a mother died by emotional trauma of seeing son hit by the driver because that type of injury was foreseeable o Court will consider any statutes with respect to the matter • Standard of Care (Extended) o Law places a general duty on every person to take reasonable care to avoid causing foreseeable injury to other persons and their property o Standard of care varies according to the activity in question such as a brain surgeon vs. person on the subway o Court must balance competing interests;  Degree of likelihood that harm will result from the activity as well as the potential severity  Social utility of the activity and the feasibility of eliminating the risk • Ie. Where there is danger of a major catastrophe it would be unreasonable not to take every known precaution o Increasingly, legislation not only imposes duties, but also sets out appropriate standard of care (regulations) for particular activities
More Less

Related notes for BU231

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit