Study Guides (248,646)
Canada (121,656)
York University (10,209)
ADMS 1000 (263)
Final

P2.Q.2 Example #3.docx

1 Page
92 Views

Department
Administrative Studies
Course Code
ADMS 1000
Professor
Rebecca Jubis

This preview shows half of the first page. Sign up to view the full page of the document.
Description
General Comments This answer scored 11/15. The student starts off with a clear definition of what downsizing is (and correctly attributes this definition to Karakowsky), and then specifically elects to discuss just two methods. This is appropriate, as the question directs the student to focus on two methods in-depth, rather than trying to cover all the different methods. The student discusses “across-the-board cutbacks” as the first example of downsizing. A clear discussion of the advantages and disadvantages is then given. However, providing an example of a company or companies which have used such methods (e.g., Toyota) would have strengthened this answer and garnered more marks, as it would provide a practical example or application of the concept. The student also notes that “low employee morale” might occur when an organization adopts “downsizing,” but in this particular case, the student should have talked about why it might happen specifically during “across-the-board cutbacks” (rather than downsizing more generally.) Indeed, if you choose to focus on a specific dimension of downsizing, your answer must directly address it. In this case, the student might have discussed why low morale might specifically occur as a result of across-the-board cutbacks (e.g., if each department has to let specific numbers of people go regardless of their performance, then employees are likely to become demoralized, particularly if they have been very productive). In other words, it is the blanket application of a policy which creates problems. The student also makes the statement that downsizing has caused damage to some companies—which is true—but again, she has digressed to talk about downsizing in general, when the focus should have been on “across-the-board cutbacks.” In other words, there should have been some discussion as to why “across-the-board cutbacks” have met with only limited success. The second part of the answer focuses on downsizing or cutting back on certain products. The student draws the Boston Consulting Matrix (BCM) which is entirely appropriate for this answer: it demonstrates in diagrammatic form what the student wishes to talk about. However, the discussion of how exactly the BCM is applied is a little unclear. If you are going to include a diagram, you must explain what it means. There should be some discussion of the advantages of keeping the “cash cows” along wi
More Less
Unlock Document

Only half of the first page are available for preview. Some parts have been intentionally blurred.

Unlock Document
You're Reading a Preview

Unlock to view full version

Unlock Document

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit