Study Guides (248,683)
Canada (121,693)
York University (10,209)
Humanities (404)
HUMA 1160 (44)
Midterm

HUMA 1160 ~ TEST 2 ~ Q2.docx

3 Pages
424 Views

Department
Humanities
Course Code
HUMA 1160
Professor
Stanley Tweyman

This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full 3 pages of the document.
Description
In terms of proving the existence of god, Descartes uses the method of analysis. Descartes holds that analysis is the best and truest method of teaching. He acknowledges analysis as being the correct way in developing a metaphysically idea: “Analysis shows the true way by which a thing was methodically discovered and derived, as it were effect from cause, so that, if the reader care to follow it and give sufficient attention to everything, he understands the matter no less perfectly and makes it as much his own as if he had himself discovered it. But it contains nothing to incite beliefs in an inattentive or hostile reader;” (Objections II, Descartes). Essentially Descartes is explaining how a person must come to the knowledge of god as if they discovered it themselves, because one who comes to the knowledge of god by themselves will have a better understanding. Descartes emphasizes that this type of knowledge must be internalized for an elevated understanding and clarity of the existence of god. In the third meditation, Descartes meticulously establishes the proofs for god’s existence. Descartes talks about objective and formal reality, objective reality being in virtue of representing something else and formal reality is the principle that determines how much actuality something has based on its independence. Descartes attributes these qualities to ideas, such as the idea of god which has both infinite objective and formal reality. God is not dependent upon anything for existence, so god must have infinite formal reality and consequently infinite objective reality. Descartes also discusses the concept of cause and effect, being that an effect must have a cause. This means that something cannot come from nothing, because the claim is illogical. An effect derives its reality by its cause and the cause must have the reality of the effect in itself, essential something that is more perfect cannot result for something less perfect. For example, Descartes talks about how a stone cannot exist unless the cause possesses within itself all that is required for producing the stone. The cause must have equal or greater reality to create the stone. Through this successive chain of cause and effect it leads to an archetype, which means the first cause of an object or an idea. When going up the chain of causes, the reality of each cause becomes greater until it reaches a cause that has infinite reality. This leads to a primary cause or idea, which Descartes holds as the idea of god. In Descartes’ third mediation his first proof establishes that the idea of god was giving by god, because the idea of god has more objective and formal reality than humans. This is true, because the idea of god has both infinite objective and formal reality, whereas humans have a finite reality. Since the idea of god is an idea that has the utmost reality, its cause must be a result of something more perfect. When examining the idea of god, one inevitably realizes that it has infinite reality. Therefore it must be the result of god, because god is the only being left that has enough reality in terms of creating the idea of god. Descartes also says that “I see that there is manifestly more reality in infinite substance that in finite, and therefore that in some way I have in me the notion of the infinite earlier than the finite”(Med III, Descartes). Through this quote Descartes is explaining how he knows himself as a finite being and is a result of something infinite. The quote itself implies that the finite and infinite are two inseparable ideas. And that if Descartes was to think of himself as a finite being and deny the existence of an infinite one, and then he can no longer think of himself as being finite. Therefore the infinite being must necessarily exist, because humans are finite. Once Descartes establishes that the idea of god was giving by god, he contemplates his origin. Descartes proposes that he might be the author of his own existence, a result of his parents, or something less perfect than god. Upon examining whether he is the author of his own existence, Descartes realizes that he would of have bestowed himself with all perfections and conseque
More Less
Unlock Document

Only page 1 are available for preview. Some parts have been intentionally blurred.

Unlock Document
You're Reading a Preview

Unlock to view full version

Unlock Document

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit