Study Guides (248,131)
Canada (121,336)
York University (10,192)
KINE 3340 (13)
Midterm

Midterm 1: chapter summaries -Summaries for chapters 1-3 key concepts from text and quick note on AHKC report card (also found in questions note) - Mostly stuff covered in lecture - Some extra things that "could" be on the test in italics - review diag

12 Pages
216 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Kinesiology & Health Science
Course
KINE 3340
Professor
Yvette Munro
Semester
Winter

Description
Text notes kine 3340 Understanding Motor Development By: Gallahue and Ozmun Chapter 1 Summary The field has gone through a rather interesting history in its move from a process-oriented maturational approach product-oriented normative/descriptive approach process approach examining underlying mechanisms of motor development. Only the longitudinal and mixed-longitudinal designs are true studies of development. developmental time rather than real time (development) Age related not age dependent (as in the cross-sectional study) Key concepts - Motor development is continuous change in motor behaviour throughout the lfie cycle, brought about by interaction among the requirements of the mvmnt task, the biology of the individual, and the conditions of the environment. - Instruction does not explain learning; development does - The study of motor development in the past was overshadowed by interest in the cognitive and affective processes of dvlpmnt. - See figure 1-1 - Dvlpmnt is a lifelong process beginning at conception and ceasing only at death. - Dvlpmnt is age-related but not age-dependent - Historically, the study of motor development has gone through periods that have emphasized various explanations of the dvlpmntl process - Whereas age-related changes in motor behaviour can be studied through cross-sectional research designs, true dvlpmntl change can only be studied through longitudinal and mixed-longitudinal - Motor development may be studied from either a process or a product orientation - Although chronological age is the most commonly used means of age classification, it is frequently the least valid - Terms convey critical concepts essential to understanding motor development - Human behaviour may be classified into 3 domains: psychomotor, cognitive, and affective - Motor Behaviour is an umbrella term encompassing the complementary but essentially different areas of study embodied by motor learning, motor control, and motor dvlpmnt - Above short form Motor Behaviour includes: 1. Motor LEARNING 2. Motor CONTROL 3. Motor DEVELOPMENT - Although there are a variety of helpful one and two-dimensional schemes for classifying mvmnt, all fall short in fully capturing the breadth & depth and scope of human mvmnt. Intro stuff: Figure 1-1 has three circles that are all connected Implies that the factors within the task, the individual, and the environment are not only influenced by one another (interaction) but also may be modified (transaction) by one another. Circle 1: INDIVIDUAL aka: Heredity, biology, nature, and intrinsic factors Circle 2: ENVIRONMENT aka: Experience, learning, nurturem and extrinsic factors Circle 3: TASK aka: Physical and mechanical factors (A transactional view of causation in motor dvlpmnt.) Motor development is a legitimate area of study that cuts across the fields of exercise pys. Biomech, motor learning, and motor control, as well as the fields of dvlpmntl psychology and social phychology. Boom (70s) dblpmntl kinesiologists and psychologists shifted their focus away from a normative-descriptive approach back to the study of the underlying dvlpmntl processes. Life Span Study of the Dvlpmntl Process stuff: Dvlpmnt encompasses all aspects of human behaviour and as a result may only be artificially separated into domains, stages, or age periods. Life long process! History of Motor Development Maturational Perspective Arnold Gesell )1928) and Myrtle McGraw (1935) - Contended that dvlpmnt is a fctn of inborn biological processes that result in a universal sequence in infant mvmnt skill acquisition. - Environmental influences only temporarily influence dvlpmntl rate because genetic inheritance is number one - Much of what we know about the sequence of infant mvmnt skill acquisition is based on the descriptive work of blah as well as that of Mary Shirley (1931) and Nancy Bayley (1935). - Provided a great deal of info about the sequential progression of normal dvlpmnt from the acquisition of early rudimentary mvmnts to mature patterns of behaviour. - Gesell and Thompson (1929,1934) and McGraw (1935,1940), studies using the co-twin control method. Given different experiences to see relative influences on environment and heredity. - Results concluded that although the rate at which the trained twins acquired the selected mvmnt skills was faster than the non-trained twins, the sequence was invariable and the advantage short-lived. - Monica Wild throwing behaviour first inquiry into developmental mvmnt patterns in school-aged children. Normative/Descriptive (1945-1970s in L) - Post WWII Anna Espenschade, Ruth Glassow, and G. Lawrence Rarick focused on the motor performance capabilities of CHILDREN. Credited with motor dvlpmnts emergence as a separate field of study within the physical education (kine) profession. They were P.E. teachers.- Since 1960 Lolas Halverson (1966), acquisition of mature fundamental mvmnt patterns did much to recice interest in childrens research because of its emphasis on identifying the mechanisms behind the acquisition of skill rather than the final skill. Process-oriented - 1980s and beyond Ralph Wickstrom vern seefeldt - During the 1980s and 90s the emphasis of study in motor dvlpmnt again shifted dramatically. Instead of focusing on the product of dvlpmnt as with the normative/descriptive approaches of the preceding three decades, emphasis shifted back to the understanding processes involved in motor dvlpmnt. - Kugler, kelso, turvey (1980)also Ester Thellen (80s-90s) jane clark (late 80s) and others led to the formulation of a systems theory of motor dvlpmnt, guiding much of the research being conducted at the present time. - 3 guiding principles drive what has become known as dynamic systems theory, 1. The body is viewed as being composed of several systems (muscular, skeletal, neural, perceptual, biomechanical), that are self-organizing and can form patterns of behaviour that come about from interaction of the cmpnt parts. 2. These systems and their various subsystems self-organize in complex and cooperative ways based on the specific requirements of the mvmnt task and in response to various affordances and constraints. 3. Dvlpmnt is seen as a discontin
More Less

Related notes for KINE 3340

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit