Study Guides (248,275)
Canada (121,450)
York University (10,193)
SOSC 1375 (91)
Midterm

SOSC 1375 - Review for midterm (comprehensive notes from all lectures)
Premium

by Anu J
10 Pages
181 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Social Science
Course
SOSC 1375
Professor
Olena Kobzar
Semester
Fall

Description
- What is normal and abnormal? Who decides what is normal and abnormal? o Influences on normal/abnormal:  Religion  Society  What do we, as a society, believe to  Nature is the only thing that is “normal” - Rule of law = all people are equal under law o No one is exempt from the law o Everyone is equal - Moral panic = a disruption that threatens the social order of a society - Look at law as: o A regulator of morals o Containment (i.e. “don’t run a red light”) - Sample case: Clara Ford (1894) o Toronto, tiny apartment near Spadina/Adelaide o Early 30s + mulatto (one parent white, one black) + seamstress + unmarried o Clara Ford shot and killed Frank Westwood  18 years old, from a well-off family  She claimed that he raped her  Is that a reason to kill him? o No: two wrongs don’t make a right o Yes: self-defence o Maybe: she was half black and she wouldn’t be able to have access to the adequate justice system that everyone else does o Clara’s lawyer: F.B. (Blackie) Johnston  Got Clara to take back her confession:  Used her minority race o Said that the two white officers pressured her into admitting it wrongly  Played into the gender role o Gender assumption is that women are dumber than men o She said she didn’t know what she was doing and played the “oh-I’m-so-sorry” card o Tapped into jurymen’s ego (to be as protectors of the woman) o The prosecutor: B.B. Osler o Social norms  Certain ideas of what it means to be a woman - Sample case: Carrie Davies (1915) o 18-year-old English woman, servant in the Massey home  Young, white, British, innocent, hardworking, dutiful, dressed in dowdy clothing, dad died in war, had to support her mother and sister by working, virgin, family- oriented, had a boyfriend sent to war o Bert Massey: liked fast cars and had a reputation for womanizing o Hartley Deward: Carrie Davies’ lawyer o E.E.A. DuVernet: prosecutor  Said she was mental (that was the only “defence” they had left) o Key plays:  Give the jury the role of the parent  Treat them as mentors, and as the parent figure  Her father couldn’t take care of the family  Convince the jury to feel something, you have already one half the case  Portrayed as insane  Epileptic seizures - What is medicalization? o The modern era: much of what we see as the abnormal now becomes medicalized  Before, the was just an aberration departing from “the right path”  Now, there is no right or wrong path… it’s a medical problem regarding a medical solution  Medicalization of social problems o Medicalization as an alternate to criminalization - Sample case: Shafia Trial st o Dad, mom, son convicted of killing three daughters and aunt (1 wife)  First he tried to deny it  They insisted it was an honour killing  Dad testified that he would do it again  Wanted to be tried in a different system (under Shari’a law)  Based on the Qur’an  Mother said:  I’m a mother, I didn’t do this (hooks on to maternal instincts and assumptions about motherhood and being good) - Sample case: Colonel David Russel Williams o Weird and different = abnormal = away from society = can be a murderer  Fetish about wearing women’s underwear  Association with cross-dressers  Associate with strangeness, weirdness, oddities o Charged for two counts of murder - Psychopathology o Story of Bedlam Asylum  Pay to go to the asylum as entertainment  See the deprived, the luckless, the ones without the grace of God  To observe the disabled was to be reassured in the distinction between abnormal and normal  Restore confidence in one’s own mental state and normality  Creating the difference helps us know our “borderlines” - Criminal law o Canadian Criminal Code 1892 – Federal Government of Canada  Section 16: Defence of Mental Disorder  (1) No person is criminally responsible if you do / don’t do something due to suffering a mental disorder o To be penalized, you must understand the nature of the act (and it’s respective consequence)  (2) Every person is presumed not to be insane  (3) Burden of proof o Defence must prove that the defendant is insane o Balance of probability determines the accuracy  Only be convicted if there is no “shadow” or reasonable doubt present o Statutory law = body of law passed by legislatures  To bind all the people in Canada o Common law = judge makes the law  Based on other cases and norms  Based on precedent - Sample case: R. V. Deviault (1994) o Henri Daviault: chronic alcoholic was asked to get some alcohol for the friend of his wife  Friend was semi-paralyzed, 65-years-old, wheelchair  H Daviault bought a 40oz bottle of Brandy, woman drank half a glass and passed out, H Daviault finished the rest  H Daviault sexually assaulted the woman o Alcoholism treated as a disease now, medically o At trial, argued that he drank 7 beers prior to the visit at a bar and after finishing the bottle went into a blackout and couldn’t remember anything until he found himself naked in her bed  Argued that he was in automatism (state brought on by intoxication)  Therefore: couldn’t form general intent o Can such a defense be used?  Non-insane automatism - Sample case: R. V. Stone (1999) o In 1993 Bert Stone married Donna Stone, difficult relationship o In 1994: trip to Vancouver. Conflict. He drove to an abandoned parking lot. She yells and insults his sexuality. o At this point he claims that her voice began to fade away and a “whooshing” sensation came over him. Next thing he remembers is looking down at her body. She has been stabbed 47 times o At the trial in his defense, B Stone pleaded insane automatism, non-insane automatism, lack of intent and provocation. The judge allowed for a defense of insane automatism o He buried the body and went to Mexico and then came back and turned himself in o Jury convicted him of manslaughter and sentence him to 7 years in jail o Verdict appealed. Upheld by Court of Appeal. Supreme Court. - What’s the difference between our legal system between 100 years ago and now? o Medicalized ways of dealing with criminal culpability (responsibility vs. culpability) o We’ve shifted from moral vocabulary to medicalized vocabulary - Aboriginals in jail - Responsibility vs. culpability o Responsibility = responsible for the crime o Culpability = who will be blamed? - Law and society o All societies have laws  Doesn’t have to have a background/basis  Can be unwritten o Laws grow from customs, social behavior and norms  Discriminatory  Emerging from moral panic and societal issues  Law can be regressive in response to fear o Law draws a boundary of acceptable and not acceptable - Legal pluralism = two or more legal systems coexisting together in a geographic area o What is law?  Codified system of rules  Institutions of the state  Courts  Parliament  CSIS  Corrections institutions (prisons, police stations, etc.)  Normative order within a social group  Set of rules, and process through which those rules are enforced - The courts in Canada o 1996: Canadian Criminal Code amended (sec. 718.2e)  Overrepresentation of aboriginal people in jail  Specifically instructs judges to look for alternatives in imprisonment for aboriginal people (to “soften” the sentence) o Jails are inefficient (bad)  Swedish jails give massages and create “better” people (less criminal)  Separate society from the individual  Make better criminals  Criminal networking o Sample case: Gladue (1999)  19 years old, Aboriginal, birthday, pregnant  Though the boyfriend was cheating with the sister  Got drunk, stabbed the boyfriend twice, died  No previous convictions… minor one for drinking and driving  Courts have to decide what to do  Aboriginal women have a high level of re-offending  We should give her a different process than other Canadian women  Fair or not?  YES o According to readings, Aboriginals already face punishment in their communities so they shouldn’t be double-punished o Take into account the circumstances of the individual  She had kids and they would have to put her away  Makes more sense to not send her to jail o Create sense of equality because it would compensate for their differences and their attempts to assimilate with the Western court systems o Canada is multicultural and we should try to be culturally-specific o Not necessarily a lighter sentence, but just a different sentence - Aboriginal laws o Importance of Elders  Source of law in the community  Wisdom, life experiences  Socio-legal system based on elders o Healing: body, mind, spirit  If something was wrong or they did something wrong, they needed to be healed  Important for the person who did wrong, and for their community o Harmony as an overriding principle in disputes and Creation stories  Restoration of harmony is a basic principle  Emerged from original ancestry  Community-based  Lived off the land with the help of the community members  Legal system evolved to have harmony be central to the Aboriginals o “Not Guilty Plea” to a charge for which a person is responsible for  Western tradition:  Not dishonest or disrespectful  Even if you committed the crime, you can plead guilty  Do what you have to do to “win”  Aboriginal tradition:  Considered rude and dishonest and disrespectful  Denial of individual accusation is an impairment of autonomy o Accept whatever someone says as their own reality o Don’t deny other people their own truth  Idea of individuality very important  Pe
More Less

Related notes for SOSC 1375

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit