Study Guides (248,585)
United States (123,441)
Boston College (3,492)
Philosophy (239)
PHIL 1090 (34)
All (17)
Midterm

Perspectives Midterm 1 Study Guide

7 Pages
164 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Philosophy
Course
PHIL 1090
Professor
All Professors
Semester
Fall

Description
Perspectives Spring Midterm 1  Outline  Plato ● rule among the people ● virtue > ● through our acquisition of virtues that our character becomes stabilized → in line with our natural end Machiavelli, The Prince ● rule over the people ● appear virtuous is good enough ● Politics are its own sphere of thinking, have very little or no concern with morality or goodness ● no point in making rules for a perfect society because men are not perfect ○ Machiavelli believes we only pursue good things for its consequences ■ This means that humans are naturally bad. We do not pursue good for its own sake ○ Aman is in charge of his own fate: To be human is to forge one’s own life “Homofaber” ○ The more that survival is threatened, the less of a choice there is ■ Necessity justifies behavior ● do not be a generous leader because that will lead to lavishness and having to raise taxes in order to maintain this reputation → the people will resent you ● fortune calls forth virtue; “fortune favors energetic youth over cautious age” ○ Chance: if you have good skill and bad fortune you can still adapt ○ Fortune cannot conquer all if your skill is equal to fortune ● not interested in soul or happiness or being a good person; all he cares about is getting power ● want center of power vs. scattered ● no such thing as natural good end ● must be able to adapt ● being human is about not having a grand plan → point of life is to go with flow and adapt to changes and get power ● 2 essential components for state: good law and good army ● UNLIKE OTHERS, says virtu → ability to seize opportunity aka doing the right thing at the right time ● avoid contempt and hatred at all costs ● The PoliticalActor: Must appear to be acting on principle while he is really acting on calculation Hobbes, Leviathan ● Machiavelli’s intellectual heir ○ both say power must be superimposed ■ not concerned w/ virtues of soul ■ functionality and efficacy > virtue ■ idea of contract and natural tendency/temptation to break it ● we have to give up total freedom for society to function ● society is not natural ● free = no restrictions to our movements; freedom means everyone has a right to everything ○ freedom will get us killed ● our social interactions are selfish → to rule people and keep them in check ● traditional view: competition stems from scarcity of resources ● Hobbes says: competition stems from greed → we’re entitled to everything ● 3 principal causes of quarrel in men: competition, diffidence, glory ○ there is always war against each other ● right of nature: liberty each man has to use own power to preserve his power ● natural law: demands that we seek peace because to seek peace is to fulfill our natural right to defend ourselves ● human contract: mutual transferring of rights and basic notion of moral obligation ○ people give up their rights for the sake of self-preservation (and only when others are willing to do the same) ○ People will naturally feel a sense of obligation after receiving a favor or service and this bond is not usually broken ● We are a desiring machine: we are naturally driven solely by appetites ● natural human hunger for power always threatens safety of contract → must have common power/sovereign authority to force people to uphold the contract ● Leviathan = name of metaphor of state in total ● we can resist sovereign for self preservation - the one right that should never be given up ● 3 types of sovereign authority ○ monarchy: power resides in 1 person ○ aristocracy: power resides in group of people ○ democracy: power in all willing to assemble for sake of g’vt ● Hobbes says monarchy is best b/c ○ monarch’s interests are same as peoples’ ○ monarchs get better counsel ○ monarch’s policies are more consistent b/c of one mind ○ civil war is less likely b/c monarch can’t disagree with himself ○ succession of power is more stable b/c chooses heir and method of succession ○ sovereign established by force vs. by fear is the same ■ only by force, people fear each other ■ by fear, people fear sovereign himself ● all natural laws are about survival and defending self and preserving life Locke, ALetter Concerning Toleration ● no one can claim absolute authority because it’s impossible to identifyAdam’s heirs and evenAdam was not given absolute authority over world ● definition of political power: right to make laws for protection and regulation of property (backed by community, for the public good) ● state of nature = state of equality (no one has power over each other) ● freedom is the right to settle disputes about injustices done that contradict the natural law ● in the state of nature everyone becomes judge and jury → this makes justice subjective ● liberty does not equal license to abuse others ● Society arises because men seek to leave the state of nature. To do so they surrender their freedoms (rights) to a power that will preserve their property. (Apower that can punish) ● war = state of “enmity and destruction” and self-preservation is #1 ○ Locke is uncomfortable with this because b/c allowed to kill each other out of self-preservation ○ in presence of common authority that acts unjustly, only possible state is state of war ● natural liberty: person’s right to be ruled solely by laws of nature ● social liberty: right to be under no legislative power other than that founded by common consent ● property of person: each person owns his or her own body and labor performed → when add own labor to object or good, object becomes theirs (ex. picking an apple) ○ BUT if take too many apples and they rot, I have overextended my natural rights of acquisition ● DISAGREES WITH HOBBES and says absolute monarchy violates principles ○ monarch has no fear of retribution → people lack comfort, protection, incentive to contribute to commonwealth ○ doesn’t agree with governing by majority either b/c ■ lack of historical precedence for g’vt by majority rule ■ nature lacks established, settled, known law ■ must relinquish natural rights to attain this ● AGREES WITH HOBBES that we would not flourish in state of nature ● BASHED Robert Filmer (who defended the divine right of kings) ● hypocritical b/c he says you can believe in anything but you can’t believe in nothing (atheism) ○ believes way to salvation is through religion ● Catholics, Muslims, andAtheists (most vicious of all b/c don’t have natural law/standard to adjudicate to) cannot be tolerated ● natural law is the most sacred thing we have as humans → painful for us to see it enforced in the wrong way ○ by natural law, we’re acknowledging and recognizing a higher being ● Humans naturally know what is right and wrong ● What is freedom for Locke? ○ to enter society we must give up some freedoms but not all ○ we give up freedom that naturally flows from law of nature ■ freedom to enforce law of nature ■ we are not best judges in our own cases to decide how much we should punish each other ■ instead, we institute a power that will adjudicate/decide in dispute ○ we don’t give up right of property or putting in labor → ownership ○ Laws must be directed towards the common good.Alegislature may not deprive a person of property without his or her consent. ● final goal of nature is to own property Descartes, Meditations ● our senses deceive us ● perception o
More Less

Related notes for PHIL 1090

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit