Genocide and Rwanda*.docx

4 Pages
151 Views

Department
Political Science
Course Code
POL SCI 5
Professor
A.Gurowitz

This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full 4 pages of the document.
Description
Genocide and Rwanda I. Mass Killing: intentional killing of a significant number of members of any group of non-combatants (political, ethnics, etc.); Many cases of mass killings in the 20h century, but not as much cases of genocide A. Genocide: a more narrow category of mass killing, construct post- Holocaust *1944 Genocide: a coordinated plan of different actions aiming at the destruction of essential foundations of the life of national groups with the aim of annihilating the group itself B. Genocide Convention 1948: o About the punishment and prevention of genocide –recognized as the supreme crime against humanity o Definition coined during the Genocide Convention (now used by the ICC, Genocide Tribunal for Rwanda etc.): any following acts committed with an intent to destroy in whole or in part a national, ethnic, racial, or religious group: killing and creating serious bodily harm, deliberately inflicting calculated conditions to bring upon their destruction, imposing measure to prevent birth within the group o A physical & mental aspect to genocide (intent) o Usually the state (due to the mass scope of the crime that requires organization) –though not defined in the convention by whose act o Some wanted to include political but wasn’t due to Stalin; too many govt. would be subjected to genocide thenleaving out political aspect became a contention Ex) 1988 Iraq mass killing of Kurds –did they intend to kill the Kurds as such or were they only trying to eliminate a political problem (genocide or mass killing?) Ex) Cambodia: Khmer Rouge considered political killing not ethnically driven when in reality, it was II. How to study genocide and mass killing A. Levels of Analysis 1. Individual o How are individuals convinced to participate in genocide? o Why do political leaders resort to genocide and ethnic cleansing? o What is it that makes some leaders do that and some not? 2. Domestic o What domestic factors explain the occurrence of genocide in a particular country? o Are certain types of states more/less likely to commit genocide? o What kinds of justice and reconciliation techniques would help a state deal with its genocidal past? 3. Systemic -lend itself better with a focus on intervention rather than genocide itself o Is there an international norm against genocide? o What are the circumstances under which you would expect outsiders intervene? o What are int’l obstacles in intervention actions to stop/ prevent genocide? B. Theoretical lenses –explaining international response to genocide 1. Realism/Neorealism Genocide and Rwanda o Is it in the states interest? If not, neorealist don’t expect humanitarian intervention. o Is humanitarian intervention more or less likely under different types of powers? 2. Neoliberal institutionalism: focus on int’l institutions that help coordinate action; do these institutions exist? How strong are they? 3. Constructivism o Why have states intervened when its not in their direct national interests? o Are there international norms with genocide? Are they strong or weak? o Where are our morals going? III. Rwandan Genocide A. History of Tutsi/Hutu relations o 15% Tutsi, 84% Hutu & Burundi (neighbor) has a similar ethnic makeup o Pre-colonial area: Hutu & Tutsi weren’t divided much (linguistically, religiously, some amount of inter-marriage) & some inequality (Ex. Tutsi were herdsmen and therefore better off) o Post WWI: Based on race theory of the time, Belgium thought Tutsi were more civilized, divided Rwanda along ethnic lines, and put the Tutsi in positions of power over Hutu majority (hierarchy of Belgian-Tutsi-Hutu); Began issuing ethnic identity cards which was required for identification  Hutus deemed Tutsis as devious, foreign, horrible perceptions o Post WWII: Hutu had enough, began calling for majority ruling; 1957 Hutu Manifesto: argued that Tutsi were foreign invaders & Rwanda was a nation of Hutus from this point, on and off violence between the two in Rwanda and Burundi B. Lead up to genocide o 1959- Revolution that kicked the Tutsi out of power and Hutu in power (*important moment= Tutsi seen as the embodiment of counter-revolution – like Jew as the enemy of German development during Holocaust; another similarity: Minority group is blocked from political power but does better economically which feeds the cycle of animosity) o With the revolution, 70,000 Tutsi left to Congo and Uganda =59ers o 1963- (worst case) 59ers charged into Rwanda through Burundi and came very close to the capital; 5,000 Rwandan Tutsi were killed in revenge o 1972- Tutsi killed up to quarter of million Hutus (internationally un- notified); confirmed adversarial relations (viewed each other as the enemy) o Early 1990s 1. An explosion of democratic movements 2. With the end of the Cold War, stopped interest and aid in Africa –no longer useful 3. Economic problems: coffee prices of its only export were down 4. Sons of 59ers formed Rwandan Patriotic Front and decided to invade Rwanda with idea of liberating country from Habyarimana and reuniting Hutus/Tutsis demanded democracy, refugee right of return o Habyarimana Regime’s responses: some refor
More Less
Unlock Document

Only page 1 are available for preview. Some parts have been intentionally blurred.

Unlock Document
You're Reading a Preview

Unlock to view full version

Unlock Document

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit